What do people prefer ? Top loaders or Front loaders. Which machine gets your clothes cleaner ? Are revolving drum action machines better than centre post agitators ? I must admit, that I have never owned a front loader. The only time I ever used a front load, was at our local laundrette. I remember my granmother's Servis twin tub when I was a kid....35 years later and we still have it and it still works !!! Our first automatic, was a Hotpoint top load with the filter Flo. Another good machine. I presently have a Whirlpool top load super capacity washer and have recently acquired a Wilkins Servis wringer washer. So which machines do you guys prefer ?
Top Load or Front Load....?
- Thread starter johnny42
- Start date
Help Support :
pierreandreply4
Well-known member
i prefer topload washers to be honest
vacuumguy99
Well-known member
We have a front loader and when I took over doing laundry I thought an hour per load was way to long, we got an wringer washer and our clothes have never looked better. Wringer/Toploader gets my vote.
Top load or Front load
I agree with you guys !! Unfortunately, living in Scotland, the majority of households are front load. If you want a top load, you either have to go on ebay or really do some searching through appliance stores. I would really love to get my hands on a Speed Queen. I have heard they have a good rep.
I agree with you guys !! Unfortunately, living in Scotland, the majority of households are front load. If you want a top load, you either have to go on ebay or really do some searching through appliance stores. I would really love to get my hands on a Speed Queen. I have heard they have a good rep.
paulinroyton
Well-known member
Top Loader
I love top loaders as they much quicker than a UK front loader and do a great job of the washing
Paul
I love top loaders as they much quicker than a UK front loader and do a great job of the washing
Paul
Top Load or Front load
Hey Paul, I do agree with you on that one. I don't personally own a front load, but some of my friends say that they take ages to do one load of laundry,while my top load can do 2 or 3 loads to their 1 load of laundry. Is that your Speed Queen Paul ? If so, I am sooooo jealous !!! Always wanted one of those !! I saw a coin op commercial SQ washer on ebay, but was too late as it had been sold !!!
Hey Paul, I do agree with you on that one. I don't personally own a front load, but some of my friends say that they take ages to do one load of laundry,while my top load can do 2 or 3 loads to their 1 load of laundry. Is that your Speed Queen Paul ? If so, I am sooooo jealous !!! Always wanted one of those !! I saw a coin op commercial SQ washer on ebay, but was too late as it had been sold !!!
brucelucenta
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,924
Ya'll are N U T NUTS!!!! Front load is the ONLY way to go these days! Uses WAY less water, gives you lint free washes, washes & rinses extremely well with NO wear and tear on your clothes and spins out so dry that it takes little time to dry in the dryer. Just no comparison to the top load machines offered today.
paulinroyton
Well-known member
Top Loader
Hi John
Yes that's my top loader washer. Simply love it, do have a couple of front loaders, but prefer the top loader.
Paul
Hi John
Yes that's my top loader washer. Simply love it, do have a couple of front loaders, but prefer the top loader.
Paul
brucelucenta
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,924
A couple??? Looks like an arsenal!
Top-load for me, please!!
I have been using a front load washer for my weekly laundry for about 20 years now and have been happy with the results. <span style="font-size: 12pt;"> We've had this water shortage in California for a few years now, so I'm happy to do my part to conserve water by using front loader(s).</span>
I have a number of both top load and front load washers in my collection and currently have 4 FL washers connected that I use for laundry each week. It's REALLY nice being able to do 4 loads at one time!
Occasionally I will move machines around and connect a top load washer (or 2) and use them for a while. However after 2 or 3 or maybe 4 weeks, I start getting uncomfortable with how much water they use and will move them out and reconnect a FL. <span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span>I do between 4 loads and 7 loads per week, usually 4 or 5 loads. That equates to water usage of 170 gallons up to 350 gallons per week if I use top load washers, depending on what machines I use.
Yes front loaders have longer cycle times (tho not as long as EU front loaders), but being able to use 4 machines at once, this is a non-issue for me. Top load washer do have much shorter cycle times and they are more fun to watch, but the amount of water they use becomes an issue for me, so I don't use them regularly.
Kevin
P.S... Paul, nice group of machines you have there! Question, what is that metal bar / bracket on the Speed Queens lid? Thanks!
P.S.S... I posted this 6 years ago, but still fun to watch. Skip to 2:18 and start watching from there!
[this post was last edited: 3/30/2017-16:43]
paulinroyton
Well-known member
@Kevin
Kevin,
The metal bar of the Speed Queen is the locking device for the machine, I know it spoils the appearance of the machine.
Paul
Kevin,
The metal bar of the Speed Queen is the locking device for the machine, I know it spoils the appearance of the machine.
Paul
locking device?
Paul,
A locking device so you cannot open the lid anytime during the cycle? Is that something that is installed on SQ machines sold in Europe, or did you install it?
Thanks!
Kevin
Paul,
A locking device so you cannot open the lid anytime during the cycle? Is that something that is installed on SQ machines sold in Europe, or did you install it?
Thanks!
Kevin
lordkenmore
Well-known member
Front Load vs Top Load...it will be interesting to see if this thread turns into a bloodbath before it's done... LOL
lordkenmore
Well-known member
As for me... I'm not sure I really can answer this question because I've never used a home front load washer. Everything has been top load, from 1960s Kenmore to 1990s WCI Frigidaire to the current BOL WP. So I can't make fair comparisons.
Not that real experience will stop people from making loud announcements of what is better on the Internet...
I have to admit that I was very biased against the idea of front load machines for a long time simply because of the horror stories I heard about them not working terribly well here in the US. And some of these experiences were reported by people who seemed reasonably likely to have attempted to use the machines properly (e.g., members of AW.org).
But...I've reconsidered my bias in recent years. I've been hearing more positive things in recent years. While these don't necessarily "sell me", I'd be curious to try living with a front load washer. And I certainly have come to realize that they are very practical for certain situations (e.g., where water is seriously limited, energy use is a concern, etc). I also have thought, often, that if buying new a front load machine makes more sense than a low water use top load machine.
However, a front load machine won't be on my "try" list any time soon. I hear stories of people who find passable machines for free or very cheap, which is my current budget. But my current laundry room pretty much dictates an older top load washer.
Indeed, at this point, I'd be more inclined to go definitely "older" with the "older top load washer." Reliability of a vintage machine is a real concern. But I cannot forget how good a job the last belt drive Kenmore did for me vs. either of the top machine designs (WCI Frigidaire and WP DD) I've had the misfortune of using since that time.
Not that real experience will stop people from making loud announcements of what is better on the Internet...
I have to admit that I was very biased against the idea of front load machines for a long time simply because of the horror stories I heard about them not working terribly well here in the US. And some of these experiences were reported by people who seemed reasonably likely to have attempted to use the machines properly (e.g., members of AW.org).
But...I've reconsidered my bias in recent years. I've been hearing more positive things in recent years. While these don't necessarily "sell me", I'd be curious to try living with a front load washer. And I certainly have come to realize that they are very practical for certain situations (e.g., where water is seriously limited, energy use is a concern, etc). I also have thought, often, that if buying new a front load machine makes more sense than a low water use top load machine.
However, a front load machine won't be on my "try" list any time soon. I hear stories of people who find passable machines for free or very cheap, which is my current budget. But my current laundry room pretty much dictates an older top load washer.
Indeed, at this point, I'd be more inclined to go definitely "older" with the "older top load washer." Reliability of a vintage machine is a real concern. But I cannot forget how good a job the last belt drive Kenmore did for me vs. either of the top machine designs (WCI Frigidaire and WP DD) I've had the misfortune of using since that time.
front load all the way
Been using a FL since 1997 (it's still going) and have never looked back. Who cares about longer cycle times? What do people do, sit there nervously biting their fingernails anxiously waiting for the washer to finish so they can put things in the dryer? I load it, set it, start it, and walk away to do other chores. It took me one day to adjust to that type schedule all those years ago. I have clothes that would not come clean in my previous GE filterflo that did come out of the FL spotless! I'll NEVER go back to a top loader.
Been using a FL since 1997 (it's still going) and have never looked back. Who cares about longer cycle times? What do people do, sit there nervously biting their fingernails anxiously waiting for the washer to finish so they can put things in the dryer? I load it, set it, start it, and walk away to do other chores. It took me one day to adjust to that type schedule all those years ago. I have clothes that would not come clean in my previous GE filterflo that did come out of the FL spotless! I'll NEVER go back to a top loader.
lordkenmore
Well-known member
Cycle time lengths
As for me, what I don't like about lonnnnnggggg cycles isn't that I do feel a need to be more or less present during the entire cycle. Not that I'm hovering over the appliance the whole time, but I want to be on the premises and awake so if something seems like it might be going horribly wrong (e.g., loud bangs, sound of running water when water shouldn't be running, a big plume of smoke, etc), I have a better chance of dealing with it before it becomes a major disaster. Major disasters have, happily, been rare...but small things with washers can and do come up.
Although I have to wonder as I type this if a lot of my bias here isn't just the sorts of appliances I'm used to. Top load washers, for example, can go out of balance. A front load machine, however, is apparently "smarter" about balancing--unless something goes seriously wrong...
Another issue, too, is that there are times when one wants/needs a load done fast. Say, one wants to go out to dinner, and wear a favorite shirt.
As for me, what I don't like about lonnnnnggggg cycles isn't that I do feel a need to be more or less present during the entire cycle. Not that I'm hovering over the appliance the whole time, but I want to be on the premises and awake so if something seems like it might be going horribly wrong (e.g., loud bangs, sound of running water when water shouldn't be running, a big plume of smoke, etc), I have a better chance of dealing with it before it becomes a major disaster. Major disasters have, happily, been rare...but small things with washers can and do come up.
Although I have to wonder as I type this if a lot of my bias here isn't just the sorts of appliances I'm used to. Top load washers, for example, can go out of balance. A front load machine, however, is apparently "smarter" about balancing--unless something goes seriously wrong...
Another issue, too, is that there are times when one wants/needs a load done fast. Say, one wants to go out to dinner, and wear a favorite shirt.
brucelucenta
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,924
I believe it all boils down to this...top load machines are things of the past and front load machines are things of the future. With energy conservation getting stricter I doubt if even SQ will be making a top loader like their's much longer. It is just ridiculous to use something that wastes so much water when there is an alternative that does a better job and produces lint free totally clean clothes using a minimum of water. Even using extra rinses would not use the amount of water that one load in a top load machine uses. There is just no need for antiquated top loaders anymore and in a few more years they will be rare. Old style top load machines are great for collections and to see how things once were.
paulinroyton
Well-known member
@kevin
Kevin.
Speed Queen machines sold in the UK have this locking device. Their machines are sold for commercial use, so can't understand why they fit this lock.
As for some front loader wash times. My LG Turbo wash machine could take over 3 hours to complete a load, you did have Turbo wash feature, but I found it would compromise on the rinse.
Paul
Kevin.
Speed Queen machines sold in the UK have this locking device. Their machines are sold for commercial use, so can't understand why they fit this lock.
As for some front loader wash times. My LG Turbo wash machine could take over 3 hours to complete a load, you did have Turbo wash feature, but I found it would compromise on the rinse.
Paul
