arbilab
Well-known member
If you watch commercial TV, you are beseiged by these ads for 'car repair' insurance.
"Car Shield"™ is one but not the only. Not that my 35yo Toyota qualifies, but I looked briefly into the genre.
I'd say disregard the come-on claims. Like much TV advertising, the BS quotient is high. And like much insurance,
the grounds for denying your claim are many.
Preexisting conditions are excluded. "Normal wear" which a great deal of auto maintenance falls under, is excluded. You must PROVE strict adherance to manufacturers' maintenance schedules. For example, if your engine explodes, the commercial makes it sound like "no problem". BUT, if it exploded because the timing belt broke and the pistons hit the valves and you did NOT replace the belt at 50,000 miles (at your own expense), you're on your own.
Jumping to the reviewer's conclusions, over half of Car Shield customers never used the insurance. Of those who did use it, over half reported that the covered repairs would have cost less than the policy. The reviewer suggests putting what the policy would cost aside into a contingency fund of your own. If you buy the policy and you don't use it, it expires and you have to buy it again.
Not so with the c'gency fund. It's the only way to 'win'.
"Car Shield"™ is one but not the only. Not that my 35yo Toyota qualifies, but I looked briefly into the genre.
I'd say disregard the come-on claims. Like much TV advertising, the BS quotient is high. And like much insurance,
the grounds for denying your claim are many.
Preexisting conditions are excluded. "Normal wear" which a great deal of auto maintenance falls under, is excluded. You must PROVE strict adherance to manufacturers' maintenance schedules. For example, if your engine explodes, the commercial makes it sound like "no problem". BUT, if it exploded because the timing belt broke and the pistons hit the valves and you did NOT replace the belt at 50,000 miles (at your own expense), you're on your own.
Jumping to the reviewer's conclusions, over half of Car Shield customers never used the insurance. Of those who did use it, over half reported that the covered repairs would have cost less than the policy. The reviewer suggests putting what the policy would cost aside into a contingency fund of your own. If you buy the policy and you don't use it, it expires and you have to buy it again.
Not so with the c'gency fund. It's the only way to 'win'.