rinso
Well-known member
<span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">While I understand the need for some Energy Star guidelines to improve on old water guzzling, slow-spinning water and energy hog top load clothes washers, I am puzzled by the imposing of such standards on dishwashers. The automatic dishwasher was an efficient appliance before Energy Star. It had already been proved to be vastly more water and energy frugal than hand washing. (more sanitary too)</span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">But, one can partially blame us whiny Boomers and our whinier Gen-X offspring for the 3 hour pee on the dishes water stream. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>After all, because kitchens in many new homes are now part of what is known as the Great Room, we don’t want to hear machines when we are trying to watch TV and listen to our premium surround-sound 7.1 systems at deafening levels. (Whenever I’ve had to do the dishes by hand, I made much more noise complaining than any dishwasher ever did by operating) An easy way for manufacturers to make their machines quieter was to reduce the force of the water. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And the bonus was that this enabled machines to wash with much less hot water and much smaller motors. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Of course it does make economic sense that manufacturers who were forced to re-design an appliance would also take the opportunity to make them less expensive to produce. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Electronic control panels have replaced mechanical timers to a great extent because the actual cost of the hardware is only a few dollars and is upgradeable with software. Like one AW member mentioned one wonders about the logic of putting electronic parts in an environment of heat, water, and steam. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">But, one can partially blame us whiny Boomers and our whinier Gen-X offspring for the 3 hour pee on the dishes water stream. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>After all, because kitchens in many new homes are now part of what is known as the Great Room, we don’t want to hear machines when we are trying to watch TV and listen to our premium surround-sound 7.1 systems at deafening levels. (Whenever I’ve had to do the dishes by hand, I made much more noise complaining than any dishwasher ever did by operating) An easy way for manufacturers to make their machines quieter was to reduce the force of the water. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And the bonus was that this enabled machines to wash with much less hot water and much smaller motors. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Of course it does make economic sense that manufacturers who were forced to re-design an appliance would also take the opportunity to make them less expensive to produce. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Electronic control panels have replaced mechanical timers to a great extent because the actual cost of the hardware is only a few dollars and is upgradeable with software. Like one AW member mentioned one wonders about the logic of putting electronic parts in an environment of heat, water, and steam. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span>