linear accelerator or chain drive?

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Cybrvanr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2005
Messages
1,287
I figured I'll bring this topic up because they share some similarities to the appliances we love. They're mechanical just like appliances, and people love the vintage ones just as much as the state of the art ones. What am I talking about? Roller coasters :)

The classic chain drive coaster is pulled to the top of the first hill with the chain. The coaster train then leaves the chain at the top and decends down the first hill rapidly building enough momenteum and speed to travel through the rest of the track. The hill sizes diminish as the ride continues to the end, and momentium is consumed by friction or wind resistance. The slow ascent up the first hill builds anticipation as the riders await that huge first drop. Some longer coasters like the Loch Ness Monster in Busch Gardens may use multiple chain drives within the ride. The chain drive is still used on both wooden roller coasters, and high-tech steel coasters too.

Linear accellerators were developed back in the fifties, but have only recently take off as computer technology have made them more powerful and more precise. An electric motor is round. A linear accelerator is basically like an electric motor if one were to "unroll" it and lay it out flat. There are magnets in the coaster train, and a series of magnetic windings in the track. When the windings are energized, the magnets in the train are attracted to them....quickly!.. in sequence. The primary linear accelerator is typically laid out on a horizontal, straight piece of track. Riders experience a powerful, brisk acceleration along this piece of track as the coaster train accellerated to speeds in excess of 60mph in less than 2 seconds! The momenteum generated by this rapid thrust is enough to propel the coaster train through the rest of the ride. Some coasters with linear accelerators like the "Rock N Roller coaster" at MGM Studios, are placed in pitch black or dimly lit tunnels so the riders cannot tell where they are traveling within the ride. This further intensifies the experience. Sometimes, smaller linear accelerators may be stratigically placed throughout the ride that can keep the train up to speed throughout the entire ride eliminiating the need to reduce the size of the hills and other elements towards the ends. Some of the latest coasters even have secondary linear accellerators placed on the uphill runs to to work around the basic law of gravity that's always plagued coasters since they were invented...they slow down on uphill runs. There are no wooden coasters using linear accelerators as of yet.
 
Me, I like optical special effects in films better than CGI.

I tend to think that the old ways are usually better. Of course, I can afford to pontificate since I'm terrified of roller coasters and that sort of thing so I'd never actually ride on one.

Linear accelerators have their place however. I'm thinking that's what the Wedway PeopleMover is. It's nice, and not particularly terrifying.

-kevin
 
The offer different enough experiences that I can't really compare them. I do like the rush of the linear ones though.
 
The older the better

The BEST coasters are the old ones. Nothing like the classic rides. And of course, my #1 is the Phoenix at Knoebels. That is just THE park, THE coaster.
 
Vive la difference

They each have their good points. Actually, I think it would be interesting to design a coaster with both.
 
Back
Top