Despite myself (and I busied myself doing lots of chores) I just got finished watching the NBC two part "movie" called "Meteor".
Ostensibly a comet hits a big asteroid and changes its course unexpectedly, aiming it squarely for earth. That was the interesting part. The special effects were not bad, esp the Patriot missiles shooting down the "harbingers". But just like any Hollywood/TV concoction, the thing is padded with stock in trade plot devices... the usual motley crew of bad guys, good cops, bad cops, lovers quarrels, father searching for daughter about to be mistreated by his former partner (shades of Arnold), etc... very tired and hackneyed. Jason Alexander as some sort of government astrophysicist was a bit difficult to believe... kept on waiting for him to pull some George Costanza worthy scam... lol...
I'll probably catch the second half next Sunday - even recorded this disaster on DVD.
What I'm wondering is, why can't TV networks/production studios come up with better writing/plots then the same old formulaic tripe?
Ostensibly a comet hits a big asteroid and changes its course unexpectedly, aiming it squarely for earth. That was the interesting part. The special effects were not bad, esp the Patriot missiles shooting down the "harbingers". But just like any Hollywood/TV concoction, the thing is padded with stock in trade plot devices... the usual motley crew of bad guys, good cops, bad cops, lovers quarrels, father searching for daughter about to be mistreated by his former partner (shades of Arnold), etc... very tired and hackneyed. Jason Alexander as some sort of government astrophysicist was a bit difficult to believe... kept on waiting for him to pull some George Costanza worthy scam... lol...
I'll probably catch the second half next Sunday - even recorded this disaster on DVD.
What I'm wondering is, why can't TV networks/production studios come up with better writing/plots then the same old formulaic tripe?