Motor stuff...
Let me get this out of the way first:
Quoting from above, "....SR motor designed by Mr. Dyson-He calls it the "Digital Motor"."
Digital motor? Yea right. Mr. Dyson is so full of shit. The only thing that he seems able to design is marketing slogans. I'm sorry, but it is an insult to the intelligence of any proper engineer to even mention Dyson's name in the same sentence as design (or on this board, for that matter). The guy is a fraud. Snake oil, Bill of goods, etc..
**I feel better now**
ON VFD. It is here, it does work, but it's sort of a fad right now. It does have significant limitations and is perhaps somewhat overated. There are inherit limitations to their usefulness, esp. beyond certain narrow [frequency] ranges of useful torque output. Those limitations are core saturation at low frequencies and core (eddy current) losses and heating at higher frequencies. Sorry guys, but you can't defy physics.
If you reduce the frequency, you must increase the core volume or cut back on the applied voltage to avoid saturation, so you can imagine what this does for torque. And similarly, losses limit the high end, unless you want to turn your motor into an induction heater. With respect to the latter point, special core materails and thinner laminations can be used that will improve high frequency operation.
Anyway, if you really want torque, you go wound rotor. Permanent magnets are a good runner up. And if you want a broad, flat torque range over your variable speed, DC motors still present the beat choices.
And to paraphrase Shakeshpere, A DC motor by any other name smells just as sweet; or in other words, is still a DC motor.