I am always interested to know where governments get the figures for their mandates from. Are they decided on best overall pactice and performance outcomes for consumers, or some kind of arbitrary consensus that only supports their agendas? Lets face it, it is clear that their priority isn't clean, well rinsed laundry nowadays, but to get people to save water and energy by hook or by crook and largely for their own political/selfish reasons.
Here in Australia, the rebate that is paid to consumers actually comes out of their own pockets anyway. Considering the relative high cost of TOL front loaders, it is a paltry sum. With the low-end front loaders it is a waste of money and as environmentally sensible as leaded petrol. So, here people are being hoodwinked into believing that they are getting a financial reward for being environmentally pro-active. What it really means is that they are motivated into buying products that may not even be what they want, that exact a much higher total cost to the environment than Australian made top loaders and it is pro-actively helping the decline of our domestic white goods industry. Last, but not least, here in Australia consumer tests now show that many front loaders, which are very highly rated for utility savings, actually underperform in overall terms.
I guess if governments mandate variety out of existence, people will become used to the existing standard of the day and not notice any resulting decline in performance.
Now, vivalavatrice asks why we don't just change to horizontal axis top loaders, where we should get the best of both worlds. If that were the case, why are manufacturers continuing to develop new vertical axis designs and technologies? Because the answer to your question, vivalavatrice, is no. A lot of the reasons for which people reject horizontal axis machines are still there. Over recent years there have been far more interesting design developments for vertical axis machines than front loaders. With top loaders, designers have been thinking a little more outside the square to achieve environmental standards it seems. Plus, they still offer consumers the choice between utility saving programs and standard operation. Anything that has been somewhat revolutionary in European washer design of late, seems to have fallen by the wayside. I also don't think that it is appropriate or good business practice to impose European washer design standards on the rest of the world.
Anyway, I don't think that the time has come to write off vertical axis washers just yet. It is clear that there are people who are convinced that they should be wiped off the face of this earth, but what do they know?