Pickering/Stanton, V-M/Gerrard, Collaro/BSR
I've always felt that it was best to spend the most money on the turntable/cartridge/stylus and to save on other components.
That said, one must be especially careful when dealing with equipment from this era. The 'Pickering is not bad, not bad at all...for a V-M or Gerrard but for the better turntables, one must really use Stanton' must have left their marketing people rolling in the aisles. The difference between the two was purely marketing - they were absolutely identical, just marketed under different names to different target groups.
Ditto the whole Macintosh/Marantz* argument or any of the other discussions which went on for decades.
A high-end V-M or Knight or Collaro or one of the real Zenith 2G turntables will not damage a record. That Ortofon cartridge, if it still works and one can get a stylus for it, sounded really really good back in the day. Bet it still does. As to really valuable vinyl, Roger is right.
*Marantz back then had zero, zilch, nada, nichts, nothing to do with the Marantz which someone under 60 knows and so there's no need to write a long comment on how comparing the two is like discussing a gen-u-whine GM Thumper and a WWI piece of excrement labeled Frigidaire. Marantz was, once, one of the elite group of outstanding component builders.