I've always liked Frigidaire's Honey Beige color. Those machines look good in it.
Yes to panel lights!While that black 57 Unimatic pair is a nice looking set, I find that Robert's 58 Imperial Unimatic is far better looking. After all shouldn't every washing machine have a panel light on it ?
It’s really tough to agree with the sentiment above. Just because a poster didn’t include a photo or photos does not discount their opinion from relevance, nor should they be excluded from discussion. Most members here should have an idea of what a center dial Maytag looks like, as well as many 1950s and 1960s Frigidaires. So no pics? So what….Both have been shared in photos on this site repeatedly for decades.If you don’t mind me saying, the first two posters didn’t even bother to provide pics, so those suggestions are nix’d out of hand. Unimatic1140’s pair are certainly sleek for the 1950s. Very pretty. But I don’t see them as 1950s Caddy extravagant styling, despite their sleek appearance.. The Westinghouse Slant Fronts had that in spades. But how about bumping even that up a couple notches? My proposed entry is the uber rare Commercial version of the Slant Front washer: The Westinghouse “Streamliner” Laundromat Slant Front model RL-1, (~late 40’s, early ‘50s). And Coin-op to boot. And yes, two of them (I was ‘forced’ to, it was a package deal). I also have the Westy dryer (thanks Tyler!)
Curves, sweeping lines, round glass port- what more could you want?
Whatcha think?
My personal view lines up with Justin’s, especially regarding the 1963 Lady Kenmore. Had so many neighbors and even a family member with them growing up, that I thought they were absolutely awesome. I still feel that way about them today.I've always loved the Ladies. Lady Kenmores that is. I would have to go with the 1963 Lady Kenmore or the 1957 Lady Kenmore.
Robert, That 57 Frigidaire set is to die for. Those are definitely a top contender. I especially love their advertisements from back then.
The 1970’s were not a good era for GM or Chrysler. I’ve never seen a 1971 to 1976 Chevy Impala in person, let alone one from 1974/1975. Haven’t seen many Chrysler cars on the road from that era either. I’ve seen far more Fords from that time period on the road in the 2000’s and early 2010’s, my guess is it probably had to do with Ford putting their cars together with more care and stringent quality control around this time. Ford even had a commercial in the 1970’s that went along the lines of “The closer you look, the better we look” which pointed out how the body panels lined up and such.The thing is Cadillacs can be fixed and keep running.... How many Toyotas are still on the road from the 1970s ?
Well, I mentioned 90's era Toyota, not 70's. I've seen more 70's Toyotas (mid and especially late 70's) on the road driving around (not at car shows, actually driving around) than mid-late 70's Cadillacs. The 70's, particularly mid and late 70's, were not good to GM and that definitely includes Cadillac. Things got significantly worse in the 1980's. Parts were already getting hard to find for 70's Cadillacs by the 90's, not sure how one is "fixing them up" besides really basic parts like tune-up and water pump/fuel pump/alternator etc. It's not a Chevy/Ford truck.
I'd say there's probably more 70's Toyotas on the road in saltless areas than 1-18's pulsing away in laundry rooms.
I’d have to go with the ‘59-‘60 push button Kenmores. The 1961 Hotpoint shown is also gorgeous.Oh yes the '61 top of the line Hotpoint automatics should also be included in the running!View attachment 315756
Sears really did set the foundation in terms of styling and pushing the boundaries for technology and learning what customers would tolerate. I'd tend to agree with Robert, but these certainly are a close second. View attachment 315598
*Some* 1971-1976 GM cars weren't very good, but the Cadillacs were an exception, in fact I'd put them up against a 90's Toyota any day (just ignore those panel gaps). While the rust-proofing was middling, they seemed to have outlasted the Corollas in the rust belt. The 1968-1979 drivetrains were right up there with 2JZ's. High nickel content & THM-400/425 trans', good for 200k-300k of abuse. Thirsty? You betcha. (How many gallons in that 806?) 5 MPH bumpers? Oh yeah. Dead reliable, but easy to service when the time came? Yes. Parts were (and still are) cheap. And there's still a ton out there for sale being passed down from 3rd, 4th, 5th owners being bought by folks who have no idea what they're doing. Sounds like a Maytag to me.The 1970’s were not a good era for GM or Chrysler. I’ve never seen a 1971 to 1976 Chevy Impala in person, let alone one from 1974/1975. Haven’t seen many Chrysler cars on the road from that era either. I’ve seen far more Fords from that time period on the road in the 2000’s and early 2010’s, my guess is it probably had to do with Ford putting their cars together with more care and stringent quality control around this time. Ford even had a commercial in the 1970’s that went along the lines of “The closer you look, the better we look” which pointed out how the body panels lined up and such.
Then again, the 1971 to 1976 GM cars weren’t very good since GM was cutting costs with that particular generation. A Ford LTD from 1972 essentially was a late 60’s car that was warmed over (that particular body shell dates back to 1969, easier to tell with Mercury Marquis made from 1969 to 1972), probably explains why they were still built pretty well around that time. In 1973, they were re-designed from the floor pan for the 5 mph bumpers but still were in the same mechanically.
Some Fords from the 1970’s are like cockroaches, they refuse to die and are impossible to kill.
I'm still looking at these in awe. Are they easy to work on? How often do these appear in the wild? Hard to acquire? Thank you.The winner in my book is my 1957 Frigidaire Imperial Control Towers in charcoal grayView attachment 315512
Still not convinced about GM or Chrysler.*Some* 1971-1976 GM cars weren't very good, but the Cadillacs were an exception, in fact I'd put them up against a 90's Toyota any day (just ignore those panel gaps). While the rust-proofing was middling, they seemed to have outlasted the Corollas in the rust belt. The 1968-1979 drivetrains were right up there with 2JZ's. High nickel content & THM-400/425 trans', good for 200k-300k of abuse. Thirsty? You betcha. (How many gallons in that 806?) 5 MPH bumpers? Oh yeah. Dead reliable, but easy to service when the time came? Yes. Parts were (and still are) cheap. And there's still a ton out there for sale being passed down from 3rd, 4th, 5th owners being bought by folks who have no idea what they're doing. Sounds like a Maytag to me.
Now, are they as stylish as the 50's/60's models that this thread leans towards? Well, erm, not exactly. But then neither was an LTD II.
A '57 Frigidaire Control Tower set? That's a 1960 CdV all day long.