P partscounterman Member Joined Jan 6, 2018 Messages 9 Location Cortez, Colorado Dec 15, 2004 #2 because i had a few minutes to kill...
W westytoploader Well-known member Joined Sep 4, 2004 Messages 4,485 Dec 15, 2004 #3 Excellent design--especially the "flush" control panels! The Highlander would be my #1 choice--timed fill and wringer agitator=FUN! Were these all solid-tub machines with perforated liners, or did Maytag switch to perforated tubs by then?
Excellent design--especially the "flush" control panels! The Highlander would be my #1 choice--timed fill and wringer agitator=FUN! Were these all solid-tub machines with perforated liners, or did Maytag switch to perforated tubs by then?
S scott55405 Well-known member Joined Oct 26, 2004 Messages 1,831 Dec 15, 2004 #4 Austin, these are perforated tub machines. Only the AMPs had the solid tub with perforated liner. That changed I believe in 1958, and these machines are from around 1963-4, I believe.
Austin, these are perforated tub machines. Only the AMPs had the solid tub with perforated liner. That changed I believe in 1958, and these machines are from around 1963-4, I believe.
A agiflow Well-known member Platinum Member Joined Feb 18, 2025 Messages 382 Location Toms River Dec 16, 2004 #5 I didn't know Maytag used the term "quad coat" protection this far back.Such well made machines those old Maytags were. I like the mid fifties Whirlpool's with the center timer dials they used for a coule of years.Maytag like and also well built. Pat
I didn't know Maytag used the term "quad coat" protection this far back.Such well made machines those old Maytags were. I like the mid fifties Whirlpool's with the center timer dials they used for a coule of years.Maytag like and also well built. Pat
