This is a hypothetical question.
The system is what allows for aircraft airconditioning on the ground, using hot, high pressure air bleed from the engines, and thus no electricity.
Liebherr have developed a unit for electric trains. It is unclear whether this is electrically driven or not, although I'd assume so. The group claim 20-40% decrease in "lifecycle costs" over traditional closed-loop, vapor cycle (i.e. R-22/410a based units).
My question is whether such a system could be used in the home or commercial environment, and whether it is more efficient than a closed-loop system. The system is naturally a heating solution, with a mixing system to divert hot, compressed air to the turbine for expansion (and thus cooling).
Benefits (Mostly for Consumer):
- Essentially no parts, aside from the compressor and turbine
- Uses the (free) atmosphere as the refrigerant
- Leaks don't effect efficiency
- Don't result in costly environmental damage (e.g. global warming), or replacement of precious gases
Negatives:
- Potential power usage (unknown)
- No profit can be made from parts; System is very simple and thus failure cannot be engineered readily into its design
Note: The systems seem to come in two varieties; the first being the traditional system where the air that undergoes compression and expansion is what you get blown at your face, as on an aircraft.
The system Liebherr seems to push uses additional heat exchangers; where the air that is compressed, and/or expanded is used to heat or cool air passing over a heat exchanger.
(Image from http://thisisecs.com/2wheel.html)
[this post was last edited: 9/10/2015-06:33]

The system is what allows for aircraft airconditioning on the ground, using hot, high pressure air bleed from the engines, and thus no electricity.
Liebherr have developed a unit for electric trains. It is unclear whether this is electrically driven or not, although I'd assume so. The group claim 20-40% decrease in "lifecycle costs" over traditional closed-loop, vapor cycle (i.e. R-22/410a based units).
My question is whether such a system could be used in the home or commercial environment, and whether it is more efficient than a closed-loop system. The system is naturally a heating solution, with a mixing system to divert hot, compressed air to the turbine for expansion (and thus cooling).
Benefits (Mostly for Consumer):
- Essentially no parts, aside from the compressor and turbine
- Uses the (free) atmosphere as the refrigerant
- Leaks don't effect efficiency
- Don't result in costly environmental damage (e.g. global warming), or replacement of precious gases
Negatives:
- Potential power usage (unknown)
- No profit can be made from parts; System is very simple and thus failure cannot be engineered readily into its design
Note: The systems seem to come in two varieties; the first being the traditional system where the air that undergoes compression and expansion is what you get blown at your face, as on an aircraft.
The system Liebherr seems to push uses additional heat exchangers; where the air that is compressed, and/or expanded is used to heat or cool air passing over a heat exchanger.
http://www.bahnindustrie.at/upload/dokumente/576/Liebherr_Air_Cycle_Technology_Leaflet_Sept_2010.pdf
(Image from http://thisisecs.com/2wheel.html)
[this post was last edited: 9/10/2015-06:33]
