Berkeley First US City to Ban Natural Gas in New Buildings

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

tomturbomatic

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
May 21, 2001
Messages
21,695
Location
Beltsville, MD
From the SF Chronicle:

<span class="storyimage fullwidth inlineimage" data-aaimab="image"><span class="caption truncate"><span class="attribution">© Andrii Biletskyi / TNS</span> Natural gas piping for stoves or water heaters will be forbidden in new buildings in Berkeley, Calif., beginning in 2020. (Andrii Biletskyi/Dreamstime/TNS) </span></span>

Berkeley became the first city nationwide to ban the use of natural gas in new low-rise residential buildings in a unanimous vote Tuesday by the City Council.

 

The ordinance, introduced by Councilwoman Kate Harrison, goes into effect Jan. 1, 2020, and phases out the use of natural gas by requiring all new single-family homes, town homes and small apartment buildings to have electric infrastructure. After its passage, Harrison thanked the community and her colleagues “for making Berkeley the first city in California and the United States to prohibit natural gas infrastructure in new buildings.”

The city will include commercial buildings and larger residential structures as the state moves to develop regulations for those, officials said.

The ordinance allocates $273,341 per year for a two-year staff position in the Building and Safety Division within the city’s Department of Planning and Development. The employee will be responsible for implementing the ban.

“I’m proud to vote on groundbreaking legislation to prohibit natural gas in new buildings,” Mayor Jesse Arreguín said on Twitter. “We are committed to the #ParisAgreement and must take immediate action in order to reach our climate action goals. It’s not radical, it’s necessary.”

The ordinance applies to buildings that have been reviewed by the California Energy Commission and determined to meet state requirements and regulations if they are electric only, said Ben Gould, the chairman of Berkeley’s Community Environmental Advisory Commission.

Gould said he spoke as a private citizen and not as a representative of the commission.

Those buildings are low-rise residential buildings, which include single-family homes, town homes and small apartment buildings. Therefore, Berkeley’s ordinance only applies to those buildings, but as the state approves more building types, the city will follow, Gould said.

The way the ordinance is written, the city’s regulations will update as the state commission approves more building models without having to return to the City Council for a vote.

“We need to find ways to move forward innovative groundbreaking climate policy,” he said. “This policy is really important and critical. It helps address one of the largest sources of emissions in Berkeley.”

In 2009, the city adopted a Climate Action Plan that aimed to reduce emissions by 33% by 2020 and 80% by 2050. The plan also commits the city to using 100% renewable electricity by 2035.

In June 2018, the council declared a climate emergency and called for a review of Berkeley’s greenhouse emission reduction strategies. The city determined in a report last year that gas-related emissions have increased due to an 18% population growth since 2000. The report also concluded that the burning of natural gas within city buildings accounted for 27% of Berkeley’s total greenhouse gas emissions in 2016.

As the city’s population soars, the need for more housing has also increased. From 2014 to 2017, the Planning Department approved building permits for 525 residential units and 925 built units were approved for occupancy. More housing is expected, particularly with the Adeline Corridor Plan, which calls for the construction of 1,400 units along Adeline Street and a portion of South Shattuck Avenue.

Electric-only buildings prevent the installation of natural gas pipes and instead install heat pumps and induction cooking, Gould said.

“Think about a refrigerator and how it makes inside your refrigerator cold and blows hot air out of somewhere else,” Gould said. “A heat pump works like that, but in reverse. It takes outside air and emits cold air outside and provides hot air inside. They can also be flipped in reverse and work as an air conditioner.”

Induction cooking transfers heat directly to any magnetic cookware, including cast-iron and steel, without using radiation.

“It transfers heat right to the pot,” Gould said. “It boils water faster than anything else that exists. It’s very even, very quick to respond.”

At Tuesday’s meeting, Harrison’s staff demonstrated the use of an induction cooktop by making chocolate fondue. The staff placed a piece of paper between the stove and the pot to show its safety features. The pot turned hot, but the paper didn’t burn, Gould said.

The ordinance restricts developers applying for land-use permits from building anything that includes gas infrastructure, including gas piping to heat water, space and food.

Accessory dwelling units — built-in basements or attics of existing homes — are exempt from the ordinance. A public interest exemption may also be allowed if the council or the Zoning Adjustments Board determines that the use of natural gas is necessary.

Sarah Ravani is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: [email protected] Twitter: @SarRavani

 

 
We have lived in an all electric townhouse for 25 years. At first I thought that it was going to be much more expensive. But over the years we’ve learned to adjust to conserve electricity, and its really not anymore expensive than having gas for water and home heating. And it certainly is cleaner and safer.

With the danger of earthquakes, and now it seems almost year round wildfire danger its the most responsible and safe way to go. Gas lines can explode and catch on fire, compounding an already terrible fire or earthquake. So,I’m all for this new legislation, it will keep us all safer. The town we live in already has many entire apartment and condo developments that were built in the 70’s and 80’s which are all electric, probably because it was much cheaper to build that way. So, many of us are already used to all electric living.

And I wouldn’t have a gas stove it you gave it to me, I’ve always preferred electricity for cooking.

Eddie
 
I thought gas was clean burning and better for the environment.  I know it's cheaper to use than electricity, although the gap has been steadily closing over the years.  And doesn't generating electricity through traditional means cause more harm?  They don't call it "natural" gas for nothing.

 

I'm not getting it, unless Berkeley is going to provide incentives for solar (with Berkeley's weather, that would be sketchily reliable at best), or already has a utility service arrangement that only includes renewable types of electricity generation.  Of course, this wouldn't be the first time that I've failed to see the logic in a decision made by the Berkeley City Council. 
 
Ralph,

I believe that safety is the incentive for this new law, doing away with natural gas service in new builds.

PG&E has a long history of negligence in the maintenance of their infrastructure. Remember the terrible gas line explosion in Burlingame a few years ago? The ancient gas line that ruptured and exploded wiped out an entire neighborhood. I think that this is what Berkeley is trying to prevent. I know that I’m really glad that we don’t have gas service in our complex. With three buildings of connected townhouses, totally 20 units, and over 41 trees on our property, if a gas line ruptured during an earthquake, or there was a leak in conjunction with a wildfire, that would be all she wrote for our homes.

So, yes, natural gas is less expensive, but rebuilding after a gas line related fire/explosion would cost a hell of a lot more than any saving realized from gas used for domestic heating.

Eddie
 
My city primarily uses natural gas. I don't quite understand the thinking in Berkley. In my part of the state, Pa., natural gas, and nuclear energy are used to generate electricity. You end up using more natural gas to create electricity than if you could just use the gas directly to heat your home. So I don't get it.
 
There's some rationality behind this...Berkeley is a benign climate, without harsh seasons so heat pump isn't a ridiculous HVAC solution; also heat pump water heating is reasonable (it's not like tap cold is 38 degrees for part of the year). Centralized emissions are far easier to manage than multiple point-sources of combustion. Seismic is another reason to consider...I'm not so scornful as others here.
 
All good discussion points;

and why further thinking explains them,
Thusly, yes, gas is cleaner, and better for the environment. So, the power companies PG&E, etc. can use gas to fire jet engines to run generators, and electricity from clean gas goes to homes. England now does this with Rolls Royce jet engines. They have replaced many coal power plants there, including the one on the Pink Floyd "animals" LP record album cover. Problem solved, wherein as a seizmic and leak detector cut off would also work, unless the power fails.
Legislation to limit the power companies rate hikes once the jet engines are paid for could also be passed.
 
Looking to the Future

I believe that Berkeley is preparing for a future of all solar, hydro and wind power which will be electric only. The state is moving towards all renewable power which will be all electric. No emissions at all.

The state energy code currently requires gas or propane for heating and water heating because it is more efficient. I guess this will change with the renewable power being emphasized.

In my opinion it is also good to get rid of the gas to homes because many of the pipelines are so old and will be very expensive to replace.
 
I get the whole idea of looking toward the future, but the overwhelmingly vast majority of existing homes in Berkeley have natural gas connections, and some don't even have 240v electric service.   In San Francisco, gas lines are still in active use for light fixtures in Victorian homes, be it a code violation or not.  I've been in a few of them.  Gas delivery pipelines are going to be necessary for many, many more years, if not for lighting, certainly for heating systems, stoves and hot water heaters in countless homes.

 

Unless they intend to force the elimination of gas in existing homes that are being nearly completely remodeled or rebuilt, I don't see this as accomplishing much.  In towns and cities where growth is still occurring -- as opposed to mostly built-out Berkeley -- I can see where this would make sense.  In Berkeley's case, it strikes me as more of a statement than an attempt to significantly change the climate situation.

 

I know that PG&E provides lower electricity rates to homes where gas isn't an option.  Maybe this will make the Berkeley ruling easier on those who rent or buy the new homes that will be impacted.
 
From a grumpy old man...

<span style="font-size: 14pt; color: #008000;">If I had an all-electric home I'd need to rent it out and move into the garage. I wish I had an all-gas home even if it meant the television's had pilot lights. I had a flat in San Francisco that had gas lines in the ceiling for lighting. Where's Dinah when us poor folks need her?</span>

 
So, does the ordinance only apply to new construction, or will the city require all-electric as part of house renovations (above a certain dollar amount)?

Yeah, I'll convert to all-electric--except for the thousands of dollars required to increase the service from the street, rewire the house, and the messy work of tearing apart walls and ceilings. But I would have saved $100 on the gas dryer that I just bought.

Thanks, but I'll live with the gas appliances.
 
Back
Top