Westys: "If the window was round the machine was sound. If the window was square, buyer beware." (If the front was blunt, it was a **nt.)
W'house let their Mansfield works lapse. By the time they caught on, it would have cost so much to update, the products wouldn't have been competitively priced. That's when they dumped the appliance division. Here's the P'bgh Post Gazette story on "Who Killed Westinghouse".
http://www.post-gazette.com/westinghouse/beginning.asp
Oops, didn't parse. Us freeloaders are denied formatting. The parsed link is at the bottom.
We had both the gearbox (~1947) version and the 2-belt (1955). Then a square-front FL that needed a lot of repairs and was much harder to load/unload and mom insisted replacing it with a Westy TL. Why did we stay with Westy? Dad worked there, substantial discount on the product but NOT the repairs. The TL wasn't too bad, but by then (late 60s) it wasn't a real Westy either.
The slantfronts I could mostly fix, except the gearbox, had to have that done. The 47 had no boot, we may have had to replace one on the 55 but back then shops knew how to do it. Mostly, stuff (baby socks) found their way into the pump and blocked it, which then either kinked the flex linkage or smoked the clutch wheel, both easily replaced. The spin clutch on the 55 wore, but it was an easy fix too. Wild spins could misposition the compliance springs. We left the top unscrewed so that could be fixed without tools. No trouble with the major parts like drum/bearings, motor or overall rust. I put a new timer in the 47 when I was 9.
When my secondhand Maytag started getting ragged in 1997 I gave it to a chick at work who used it for a year before the motor seized. I got a Frigidaire/GE/Whoever FL and it's been trouble free, VERY unlike MT Neptune of the era. Cuz FL works better, cheaper, doesn't tear up clothes as much as TL. Not to mention my fascination with them. In 1997 just like in 1953, I'd sit in front of it and watch the whole cycle.