Coal For Heating, Cooking and Laundry. Anyone?

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

launderess

launderess

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
20,655
Location
Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage
Since the subject was brought up in another thread and not wishing to hijack, thought this might be a good topic for a winter's night.

Most of us are probably that well spoiled for choice in this modern flip a switch/turn a knob era of gas and electic that the idea of having to manage with coal is totally alien.

Here's peek at the oft quoted (by Moi) BBC/PBS programme "1900 House" showing how modern housewife/family dealt with doing laundry via coal and no mod cons.[this post was last edited: 1/28/2012-20:53]

 
I remember that series

I am sure it was quite a bit harder in those days Laundress. I know my parents, grandparents had to deal without alot of the niceities we enjoy today. Like simply turning up the thermostat when cold and having a hissie fit when the hot water was not there. I could not fathom trying to shave with a straight edge razor. I would go back to using coal if I had to, but for right now, oil and gas heat is Soooo much easier.
 
It's probbly cleaner to burn coal in a properly outfitted power plant where most of the polution can be captured and dealt with in one place rather than having chimneys spewing coal smoke all over towns. Burning coal puts mercury, among other toxins, in the air. Coal burning produced the smoke which combined with fog to kill many in Britain and in steel towns in Pennsylvania during air inversions.
 
Personally, I'm quite fond of the use of soft coal for heating.

 

While we do have an electric forced air furnace when the temps drop into the 20's we usually fire up our slide in wood/coal stove.

I loike the slow burning property of coal and find that it lasts longer when I bank up the fire to last through the night or for when away at work all day.

Yes its a bit messy but the slow burning and long lasting heat it produces is worth it
 
Electric Heating

Up here, electricity is very expensive. Nobody has electric heating. An electric Hot water heater costs at least 60+ bucks a month more on your bill. People that live in mobile homes with a kerosene oil forced hot air furnace and electric water heater pay thru the nose. Since furnace fans are also expensive to run. Soft coal never was popular here. They used to take the hard coal and somehow burn the gas off and pipe it to homes in the cities for gas stoves and water heaters and then sell the leftover, called coke, at a discount. People would use that in their furnaces for heat. We used oil for heat when I was a kid because it was cheap then.
 
heating with coal

When I was growing up we heated exclusivly with coal (sometimes wood) in a modern 1970's coal furnace. It required a lot of work and was very messy. We had to wash the sheer white curtain 2 to 3 times a winter to keep them from turning gray with coal dust and spring cleaning was a major event after a long winter. Everthing had a layer of oily coal dust on it. JEB
 
Yes, Folks That Is Where There "Spring Cleaning" Com

After long Fall/Winter of closed up homes heated with wood or coal things indoors were well rather grimy. Once warm weather settled in for good windows where thrown open and *MAJOR* housework began.

Those with funds actually decamped to other homes or perhaps on vacation whilst servants got on with things. Those not so lucky dragooned any spare of hands they could latch on to. Children, nieces and other female relatives such as "young" spinsters would often travel about helping with this chore. This often was in addition to the servant (usually maid of all work) help as well.

From what one has read it was a mess and husbands (no surprise) often absented themselves from this effort. Though in the country one can understand as they had farm work to do.

Everything was washed, scrubbed down, cupboards, dressers, shelves, etc emptied and cleaned. Heavy drapes taken down; cleaned and perhaps put away in favour of lighter summer ones, same for curtains.
 
HI everyone

Coal for cooking. Not so bad after all. The 1900 House was a great program. English coal burning cookstoves were a lot different than American ones. Majestic, Copper Clad, Home Comfort, Kalamazoo and the list went on in America. Cast iron ranges in America in 1900 did not have open burning fires such as the English version. A fire box at one end of the range, not in the middle such as the English one provided a much better source of heat and for cooking and baking. My Copper Clad had two openings for water pipes to circulate water through the heat exchanger and back into the boiler for storage. The only really potential danger here would be to get the water too hot,boiling, and not keep an eye on the temp.gauge and have the boiler explode!
I could light a fire using coal as the heat source and could have the stove hot enough to cook on in 45 min. Gary
 
We heat our house with a 1952 Gentleman Janitor Hard coal stoker boiler. Its no more work than oil or gas with the exception that about every three days you have to empty the ashes. Its no dirter than oil or gas either.
 
Grandma's steam furnace was originally coal, converted to gas so grandpa didn't have to wake up at 4AM and man the shovel. To appreciate where we are, it helps to know where we were so shortly ago.
 
WHERE???

Can you still BUY coal, here in the South you cant buy it anymore,,at least not here, my Parents used to buy a ton each year and we burned it in the fireplace along with wood, we had an oil furnace, but a coal fire just has a warmth that nothing else has, I remember as a kid in the 70s several houses as well as our Church and school had stokers, but not anymore....Talking about the hot water heater in a cookstove, I know a lady who said her mother had a half wood/coal half electric range , the plumber put in a new electric water heater, disconnecting the pipes leading into the firebox...he unfortunately,capped them off, when her mother built a fire to cook Sunday dinner, it blew up, she had gone to the mailbox,or she might have been killed, She said her mom had an iron skillet on the stove frying a chicken, and that it made a print in the ceiling of the pan and the pieces of chicken, it of course wrecked her stove as well as the kitchen, when they finally got the hot coals watered down , she said her brother went to the plumbers house..I bet he got an earful!!
 
Yes, coal gas has a lot of carbon monoxide in it. An iron-making blast furnace is basically a big coal gas maker; it burns hard coal or coke in an oxygen-poor environment. The exhaust is mostly carbon monoxide, which actually burns pretty well. A lot of steel plants took the exhaust from the blast furnaces and piped it to boilers where they burned it to make steam, which powered the air pumps for the blast furnaces among other uses. So it was sort of a closed-loop system.
 
Here's a good discussion of coal gas.

Apparently the less pure, lower energy form burned bright yellow, which was good for lighting (known as town gas). Then it got cleaned up and twice as much energy using the blue water gas method, but it lacked the soot-forming impurities that gave town gas its brightness. So they had to add the impurities back in with the carburetted water gas method, which injected petroleum compounds into the hot gas and then cracked them down to sizes that burned bright.

I gather that the calorific component of coal gas was at least 50% carbon monoxide, which we don't normally think of as a fuel but in fact can be burned. The rest of the calorific content was hydrogen. In standard coal gas, nitrogen made up the balance, diluting the energy value, and was reduced in volume via the aforementioned blue water gas method.

Coal gas - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
Carbon monoxide

Carbon Monoxide is a product of incomplete combustion. Even in natural gas furnaces/boilers, CO can and will exist. In any kind of combustion process, if there is not enough air to mix with the fuel, or not enough time for the air to properly mix with the fuel, CO will form. CO emissions can be controlled by putting the right amount of secondary air into the combustion zone. The downside is, too much combustion air will result in nitrous oxides being formed, or NOx emissions.

By keeping the combustion temperature low at 850 degrees Celsius, NOx and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) emissions can practically be eliminated. This kind of combustion can only be found in Fluidized Bed Combustion boilers, which so far only exist on the commercial/power level.

The big problem with coal combustion is the emissions. NOx and SO2 emissions are huge. Coal is very corrosive. In plants where coal is crushed and then pressurized to be blown into the boiler, the coal gas flowing through the pipes can quickly erode the pipe away if there is no ceramic lining inside the pipe. If you do not properly control the emissions from coal combustion, it can also eat away at all of the exhaust equipment.

Not to mention, the infrastructure needed to clean the exhaust gasses from coal. Bag houses, wet/dry scrubbers, electrostatic precipitators. All this extra equipment can double the land needed for a power plant. Maintenance on the equipment can be costly too, there are figures showing about a 47% offset in costs consumed by emission controls alone.

I am not saying coal is a bad fuel, its cheap to buy, but costly to burn when you factor in all the emission controls, and maintenance felt by big plants.

Here is an example of poor combustion controls. One of the hospitals here in Dartmouth purchased a new chimney top. They didn't properly modulate the SO2 emissions, and after about 9 months, the stainless steel top started to corrode away to the point where it looked like there was a halo on top of the chimney!
 
Where can you buy coal?

Got me, although about 10 years ago I bought a couple sacks of "charcoal" for my BBQ, that was made in China. It has the unmistakable aroma of coal, and was in small tubular chunks that looked like they were pressed shapes. I don't like it too much, still have most of the stuff left. Real wood charcoal is far superior.

There's an old mansion/estate in the hills near here that was built on a coal fortune. People don't normally think of California and coal together, but at the turn of the century Mr. Dunsmuir built an impressive property in a little valley, complete with a small farm, swimming pool, various ponds, etc. He made his fortune importing coal by ship into California. Unfortunately the little valley is right on top of the Hayward earthquake fault, and the swimming pool along the line, and has had to be shut down, but the house is still standing. At one time the house had coal fired boilers for the steam heating system, but has since been updated with forced air heating. Which is sad, since the heating contractor wound up cutting these big holes in the fine wood flooring to install air registers that do not match the vintage look of the rest of the house. In fact they stick out like sore thumbs. The property is now a municipal park where various seasonal events and conference take place.

Back to coal: in this area I understand one can get coal from Lazzari:

 
Quick Google Search For "Coal Sale"

Brought up numerous vendors who sell coal from bags to truck fulls.

Mind you most seem to be here in the Northeast with most near places where coal is mined such as PA.

Anthracite is the favoured coal of many around here and those whom use the stuff aren't keen on word getting out for fear of raising prices.

Ages ago when coal was used for everything from powering locomotives and ships to heating homes suppliers were more numerous. As railroads and ships shifted to diesel and or oil, then homes began to use oil and later electricity for heating demand for coal dropped and so did the infrastructure used to support it.

 

Latest posts

Back
Top