Curbside find saves me from the GE

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

roto204

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Messages
2,779
Location
Tucson, AZ
Well, the KUDS-22 ate it when a glass got broken in the top rack, and all the little shardlets (new word) got into the pump and caused the motor to go nuts.

The result: I was back to using this...

(And no, it's not a cool kitchen or a great place for a dishwasher. It's sitting in the Banishing Place right now.)

9-10-2006-14-06-36--roto204.jpg
 
The GE

After an interminable wash cycle, a dry cycle that commanded attention because you couldn't turn the element off (ended up disconnecting it for our sanity's sake), four hours, and fifty-two water changes later (okay, it only seemed like it, but still...), you ended up with yiblets on your glasses in the top rack, and possibly clean dishes elsewhere in the machine (it was like a treasure hunt--can YOU find the clean dish?).

I am convinced that this machine had a dispenser of food particles that injected them into the wash water during the final rinse. I have determined that you could have put clean dishes in this dishwasher, and they still would have come out dirty.
 
The solution

It was not black and gorgeous when we found it (though almond is better than harvest gold), but it sure is now.

Gloss black, and brushed metal abounding...

Special thanks to Roger for mega mechanical coaching and a really neat way to re-form crushed aluminum trim :-)

Introducing the Design | Manufacturing Magic Chef!

It was requisite that we keep with the "metal chic" look of the kitchen for which the Superba set the tone, so this machine continues that tradition nicely.

9-10-2006-14-14-17--roto204.jpg
 
Wash cycle phase was about 45 minutes long. It had 7 water changes. Disconnecting the Calrod just made cleaning worse lol. I'm wondering if the water solenoid was restricted by some sediment and dind't get proper full water fills. I really didn't have much trouble with mine, except for rice, but then again, it wass brand new in an apartment exactly 30 years ago this month.
 
Nate, nice looking. It uses as much, if not more water than the GE. As Greg puts it, D&Ms were water hogs. Does it have a full spray arm under the top rack. There were versions of this model I saw with only 1 wash level. Roger thanks for the coaching. It does look very nice. Surprised the tub hasn't rusted through, must not have been used much.
 
Whee!

Magic Chef.

Check out the features that more GE-disillusioned and cranky housewives demand:

- NO MORE YIBLETS ADHERING TO THE TOP-RACK GLASSES because there is the patented Mofo-Blaster<sup>TM</sup> top-mounted, full-length, stainless-steel wash arm.

Crumbs and onion-bits begone!

I've never seen this spray-arm configuration on a D&M machine before...my grandmother's Kenmore was a three-arm (big on the bottom, this machine's top arm in the middle, and a smaller constant-rinse on the top) configuration, but this is a lot of fun.

It's like owning a single wash-arm KitchenAid with the mother of all constant-rinses.

Only, this machine gets burned rice off stuff, which surprised me, because the Superba couldn't pull that off.

9-10-2006-14-16-14--roto204.jpg
 
Whee again!

Magic Chef.

For when steel wool and obscenities just aren't enough.

- With the time-tested VelociMatic<sup>TM</sup> bottom wash-arm, even casserole dishes and small automobiles can be flipped-over and filled with water if you don't use the tines carefully.

- No spray tower. You bought the pot at Robinsons-May, but you forgot to bring your dishwasher to see if it would fit. Well, never fret again! You have full rack-loading flexibility with your new Magic Chef!*

*Okay, well, you have to load it like a single wash-arm KitchenAid or else nothing in the top rack gets touched, but it's really flexible ASIDE from that.

9-10-2006-14-21-14--roto204.jpg
 
Wow, this was a very short-lived design from D&M. Yeah had great potential, but the bottom rack just didn't hold a lotta stuff. Believe me, I played with a two Caloric versions of this. They did clean pretty well though. I believe this style was around very early 80s for just a couple of years. CR really bashed it for the botom rack not having as much space as with the towerless arrangement. Wish they could have kept the spray arm under the top rack & done the full-size top arm. This was kinda like a reverse rack Maytag immitation.
 
Whee three!

Magic Chef.

- It's The Powerhouse, because it's a known fact that any appliance just looks cooler and works better when you give it a slogan.

- It's The Powerhouse, because it's about time your dishwasher switched from passive-aggressive to just-plain-furious.

Magic Chef. It's not taking crap from your dishes anymore.

9-10-2006-14-25-56--roto204.jpg
 
Oh wow, this model didn't offer the 3-level wash. I forgot about that. Had a couple from my singles group in Houston that bought a new house in 1983 with this model, but from Gaffers & Sattler. The design without the tower would have driven me nuts, but then again, they pre-rinsed everything.
 
The softer side of...

Magic Chef.

- Flexibility. Power. All this, in an energy-efficient package that uses four ounces of water to clean and only costs $2.17 per year to operate.

It's why we call it "The Energy-Engineered Dishwasher."

9-10-2006-14-28-51--roto204.jpg
 
LOL

Okay, enough kidding. The only thing that hoists this dishwasher above the GE (aside from pure sex-appeal) is that the dishes come out SPOTLESS, no food kibble is left scattered in the top rack, and even the divets in your coffee-mugs are filled only with absolutely crystal-clear water.

NO MORE YIBBLES. (I cannot overemphasize how much angst gritty glasses created in our household...)

It's also a LOT quieter and has a much more appealing sound when it's running. Plus, I remember it from growing up--let's be real; this is part practicality and part nostalgia :-)

Yes, Bob, it uses just as much water and electricity as the GE, if not more so, but the fact that it produces results and looks so good doing it makes it a winner in my book :-D

But you're absolutely correct, and yes, loading--though this machine holds a LOT--is very tricky and requires careful thought, or else havoc can be wreaked in the top rack (and let me tell you, if you make a mistake loading the bottom rack, it's not just a "little" dirty in the top rack afterward...)

The easiest way I've found to load it is to pull-out both racks, and look down through the top rack to the bottom rack. If anything is blocking significant space in the bottom rack, then avoid loading anything in the corresponding space up top.

The spray-tower config probably did loads better than this design, but the sheer novelty of this machine, with all its "I wanna be a Maytag" quirkiness makes it lots of fun.

Plus, it's pretty. :-)

That's very cool that you've gotten to use the other configs of this design. How fun! :-D

*Hugs*

--Nate
 
Yes it was fun, especially looking back on it, compared to what on marekt today. I wish I had taken that loading approach with loading KDS15, KDS16 dishwashers. Although, O would have been shot because that would have meant empty space in the top rack. I come from a background of ya don't run it until it has a Bob load in it lol. I had neighbors transferred to Austin the year before I aws transferred to Temple (this would be 1984). They bought a house with the Caloric. Drove me insane. She believed in prewashing everything.; And tilting dinner plates forward. THEN she'd use the longest wash cycle with all the water temp booster points (main wash & last rinse) everytime. It got used a lot, they always seemed to have company from Houston. It lasted until about 1992 or 1993. I could still hear the thang running when I was in the guest bedroom, over the garage, and the kitchen was complete opposite end & corner of house. Teh replacement was a Maytag. Wonder if that's still running. Haven't seen 'em in years.
 
The GE and the road to recovery

I'm wondering if the water solenoid was restricted by some sediment and dind't get proper full water fills.

It had a new water valve that was known to work :-) The GE did get its full fill of water; it just sucked. No excuses :-)

It was 30 years old, though, and probably had never had the sump cleaned from years of chicken bones and broken glasses, so I'm sure the pump performance suffered. I couldn't work-up the enthusiasm to tear it apart and clean it out, though, because A) it was ugly and B) the sump has about the structural integrity of Rice Krispies holding hands. (It's about to rust through completely.)

Nevertheless, the GE design--in more TOL machines--was probably proven, and the Power Shower would not have hurt with the top rack top-down coverage.

Disconnecting the Calrod just made cleaning worse lol.

I wouldn't be surprised. In our case, I saw no difference in the lack of cleaning performance between the time that the Calrod was on and when it was disconnected, but we have really hot water here anyhow.

The D&M was a work in progress. When first found, aside from being disgusting and every conceivable kick-panel and trim part being bent, dented, or broken (it seems people get confused by the kick-panels on these machines--they don't pop off, and don't come off via screws from the front--you have to get at their screws by opening the door, and a lot of people pull and pull at it out of frustration), it was noisy and leaked from the motor. (Obviously, not a good under-counter candidate.)

Turns out, someone had broken enough glass in this machine to make new sand for a beach. All around the tub seal was a sparkling sea of glass bits, crushed and recrushed over time, probably by the macerator. The spray arms had chunks of glass in them, and also little tabs of black plastic that solicited a hearty "what the f--- is this?" as the machine came apart.

Of course, those little black "tabs" were vanes of the drain impeller that had been blown off the impeller disc by a few sizeable (sturdy) chunks of glass. The now-wobbly impeller, Roger theorized, probably contributed to the decline of the porcelain-carbon seal for the motor.

The good news is that D&M parts are CHEAP (you can get an entire new mechanism--minus the spray arm and the motor--for about $50), and so I was able to get a seal kit that came with new impellers, O-ring, shims, new carbon seal, new porcelain seal, and a shim feeler. That fixed it beautifully, and made it run the way it should (minus the vibration and minor waterfall from the motor.)

Further cleaning, bending, and fixing yielded the results you see :-)

I was tickled by the parts bag for the seal kit, though. Since when did Electrolux claim Kenmore as one of their own brands? :-) It makes sense, but this was the first bag I'd seen that listed Kenmore right alongside Tappan, Kelvinator, and friends.
 
I had the same black tabs show up in my 1980 Kenmore in about 1984--I started looking at Maytags, but soon found out I was buying a new house so, didn't bother. Yeah, Kenmore was flag ship of the D&M line, but there were so so so many brand names that D&M made machines for all at the same time.
 
Tabs!

*chuckle* I wonder what became of that Kenmore? :-)

I'd bet that really what breaks glass in this machine is the intensity of the water--these are big thumpers-and-bumpers and probably smack things around quite a bit. I've been very careful when loading wine glasses and the like.

The bottom only has cosmetic rust (something metal landed on top of the porcelain and discolored it), which is good. Roger mentioned that he had seen a lot of rusted-out ones too, and no, this machine design never seemed to have a lot of longevity associated with it.

However, my grandmother's D&M is still going strong today--though it does have a spot of rust at the bottom. I guess some machines never got the memo, and just refuse to die, like Greg mentioned about that WCI Kelvinator we had... :-)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top