First Milk, Now Popcorn Prices Are On The Rise

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Well, at least for now, I think the 3rd reason people DO
go to films is they don't have a fancy home theatre system.
And none of those can really match the large screen.

I do agree the group experience really isn't necessarily
pleasant - but maybe that depends on the perception of age.
 
On occasion I will watch movies at the theater.For instance I have both "Pirates of the Carribean" onb Blu-Ray DVD.After watching the second one-"Dead Mans Chest"You were left hanging and had to watch at the theater what happened next!clever Disney folks!sometimes I do look to watch at the theater-yes they do have a much bigger screen than I do at home.And sometimes do want to watch with other people.however on occasion I watched a movie by myself!No one else in the auditorium!Just for Me!Sometimes is nice to have someone else show the moovie for you-and the show was out of frame-told them and they fixed it-and gave me a free pass to another show!Great service-now I watch movies at that theater-Consolidated Cinemas.New theater here in town.We also have a 12 screen Carmike-the Consolidated has 14.And yes-sometimes I want to watch a movie as its released rather than waiting for it to come out on DVD.
 
DADoES I agree

First and foremost, what makes a theatre profitable is whether it plays the films that an audience wants to see. Theatres can't just order up whatever they want, that's partly dependent on competition and strength of the chain booking the location.

What does the public want at a rule:
a sea of parking, the lowest ticket price, stadium seating ( though many would complain if you had it), high number of screens (greater chance you'll have the film they want to see and the perfect time), and a good sound system.

It's a tough business now. My biggest complaint is that all titles are booked at so many theatres in the area that no one can have a good gross or a lengthy run. Check an old newspaper to see what I mean. The most recent example of this for us was with "A Mighty Heart" on 23 screens in the STL area.

As DADoES put it, that's at the distributors advantage.

Sorry for the rant, but it bothers me to hear the complaint of the end result when the problem was twenty steps back. Since I also collect vintage radios and tv's, I frequently bitch about the quality of the products, but the old stuff simply weighs too much to be shipped from China.
 
Thats a problem with older Hi-fi equipment--yes there is a market for it in China and Japan-those guys want our vintage equipment-that is why it is becoming scarce and expensive-and yes- tube amps are heavy and delicate-but the Asians pay a good price for it and the shipping.
As for moives currently-there is more powerful competetion to theaters more from DVD's Satellite TV,Cable,and now Hi Def DVDs-(HVDVD and BluRay)Its now many people simply wait for their favorite movies to appear on one of those mediums and watch it at home-yes you can go to the bathroom without interrupting your movie-get whatever "concessions" you want without interrupting your movie.You just don't get the bigger screen and other folks watching the movie with you.If theaters are to survive-their system has to change.the system of booking and distributing movies will have to change.theaters should stock a WIDER selection of concession items.Remember when you went to a THEATER for the best selection of candies-no more!the selection of snack items at most theaters I have been to is pretty lame.Stock the items I wish to eat-Or will I have to bring it?Theaters may have to lighten up on this-Its better to have "butts in the chairs"!than having them empty!Digital projection(no films are involved)may help out the theaters-the "films" are downloaded to the theater to show.This is slowly taking place(Carmike)I haven't watched a digital "filmless" movie presentation-but would like too.On the "Film-Tech" website they argue which is better film or digital-would like to see for myself.the thought of a projector to a manager with no moving parts or film handling is a dream come true for them.I hope theaters can survive-its getting tough out there-but if they and the system doesn't change-they may become dark houses.People will just watch movies at home on their new Hi Def widescreen TV's.
 
I wonder are Fox News simply taking the oil industry's line i.e. Bioethanol = bad! Gasoline = Good.

There are other factors that could also cause a rise in the price of popcorn i.e. there has been a huge increase in the cost of diesel which has had a knock-on effect on the cost of running farm machinery, transport and energy used in processing, packaging and ultimately popping the pop corn.

That wasn't mentioned at all.

It was just "see what those mad hippies are doing to your popcorn!"

Every moment spent watching Fox News is another moment of your life wasted and another hike in your blood pressure.
 
So called Ethanol isn't always good-crops raised just for that purpose is LESS efficient than using the petroleum products-you have to plant and raise the crop-We are burning fuel to do this-then transport it to the mill or plant where the ethonal is made.Then you have to transport the ethanol to the refinery-pipelines can't be used for it since ethanol is corrosive.So--that leaves us with trucks and rail transport--now were burning fuel again!Ethanol from WASTE agricultural products is a little better.And another bad thing-Ethonal does not have the same octane as gasoline-It just doesn't pollute as much when burned-but the engine has to be designed to use it.for instance small motors such as on lawn mowers CANNOT be used with Ehtanol-you will void the motors warranty.Its on both the books on the B&S and Tecumseh engines I have.
 
My gripe with movie theaters has to do with digital projection! Yes, the projectors have no moving parts, but they are ludicrously expensive compared to the old mechanical film projectors. Yes, they do break down. My company services some movie theaters, and the digital projectors have a lot to be desired. How is a little independant single-screen house supposed to foot the bill for a $60,000 projector every 5 years? Their old Simplex 35mm that they paid $1000 for 30 years ago still gets the job done perfectly.

The picture quality off the digital projectors basically looks like you are looking at a big projection TV. There's pixelation, compression artifacts, and worst of all, there's less resolution and contrast range than film...video cannot come close. Why am I going to go pay $10 to watch the same picture and sound quality I can get at home with my own equipment???

I guess part of the reason why digital projection is catching on too is that the digital projectors do not need any preventitive maintence, or skilled operator to load, thread and keep running. Film projectors need cleaning, adjustments, etc in order to produce the best picture. Regal Cinemas around here for some reason refuse to do these basic acts, and it shows up as dust/debris in the picture, scratch film, out of frame pictures, or even worse, a jammed projector halfway through the show! If the theaters would do basic service on their projectors, the nice picture that film can produce could really shine!

It all really boils down also to Hollywood turning out material that people really want to watch. A constant complaint by many people are that movies have too much violence, bad language and other sleeze in them. Another common complaint is that films are almost always politically loaded with a liberal slant. While I know most of you all here are more left-wing, a large portion of America is particularly conservative, and do not find all the political messages, violence, bad language and other trash particularly entertaining. Outside of those common complaints, in my own opinion, the plot lines of most modern movies has become particularly shallow and dumb. I do not like the editing techniques used lately too, where camera angles and shots are changed in rapid succession. No scene gets any more than about 5 seconds at best in any one position before the angle is changed, or the whole scene is changed. Even when a scene is held for any reasonable time, the camera is always panning, zooming, etc...it's everyone that made the movies have ADHD or something! Why can't they let the plot and story hold the viewer's attention, instead of their spastic cinematography (it actually looses my attention because it fatigues me!!!)

Simply put, theaters are loosing money because they have not provided a quality product!!!
 
Ethanol and lawn mowers

How old are your lawn mower manuals? Are they saying any
percentage of ethanol will void the warranties? I've been
using ethanol-blended gas in my mowers, chain saws, etc, for
more than 10 years. Is is just an excuse to void a warranty
vs. something that actually damages the engine? If you want
to burn E-85 or pure ethanol, then yes, the engine has to be
designed for it. (And, yes, your MPG figure does go down when
using ethanol.)

conservative/liberal

One does not have to be a conservative to dislike violence,
bad language, and other trash in movies. Though in fact,
the worst purveyor of it that I have seen IS conservative -
Rupert Murdoch and FOX.
 
My mowers are current-brand new.And Ethanol isn't available here.B&S motor on the Crafstman-Tecumseh on the Toro.
On projectors thats what I thought-Film machines can be easily and relatively cheaply upgraded to run new picture and sound formats-can this be done with those EXPENSIVE Digital models?You can have a 50+ yr old film projector and it can be adapted to play newer films.If the digital movie presentation is like a digital TV-will watch at home.Also its bad that some theater chains do not keep up on maintenance and repairs on their equipment.The customers suffer as well as the film prints-maybe if the studio BILLS them for the damaged film prints sent back from the sloppy theater to the film depots-maybe they will change.I can agree the quality of Hollywood has to change-And it is the MAJORITY of Americans don't like the liberal slants on TV-Radio networks and Hollywood movies.Newspapers,magazines too!that is one of the reasons subscribers are down.I watch Fox just to get a DIFFERENT veiw of the story -don't always agree with them-but HATE the Communist veiw the libs have.and on the current movies agree-the sudden camera angles,sloppy hand held camera shots-and the "round-de-round"camera shots around the scenes or actors makes me sick!the handheld cameras make the show look like a sloppy home movie!Makes me Seasick.Get the cameraman a tripod or pedistal please!Lets make movie watching a real event-not just glorified TV.Sadly Fox,CNN and even the major networks are using the "Rollover" news formats-they keep repeating news stories until new ones come up.Drives you NUTS.Turn TV off at that point.
 
Isn't it typical that when this country jumps on the bio-fuel bandwagon we go for a subsidized food crop like corn instead of other organic sources. Brazil uses the sugar cane, but I don't think that they sacrifice the sugar before using the biomas for fuel production. Here, we are going to make food unaffordable for the poorest so that those with more money can drive their SUVs. Grocery store prices just go up each week to where it's frightening, but we don't want to talk about inflation.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top