maggie~hamilton
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2006
- Messages
- 711
Looks like someone just wants to quibble.
So I should probably just drop this. Which I will, after making the point that the organist did not have the power or authority to decide what organ the church got. She simply made a recommendation based on her experience. And she made that recommendation AFTER the church was built, not before.
I am not sure why this is such a sore point, that sometimes architects DO make mistakes. In particular with church facilities, all you have to do is take a look around at a few of them and see many astonishing blunders -- particularly regarding acoustics and acoustical treatment.
After being a church organist for 35 years, I have seen some incredibly bad choices that were made by architects.
Okay, nuff said. It's really not worth arguing about.
So I should probably just drop this. Which I will, after making the point that the organist did not have the power or authority to decide what organ the church got. She simply made a recommendation based on her experience. And she made that recommendation AFTER the church was built, not before.
I am not sure why this is such a sore point, that sometimes architects DO make mistakes. In particular with church facilities, all you have to do is take a look around at a few of them and see many astonishing blunders -- particularly regarding acoustics and acoustical treatment.
After being a church organist for 35 years, I have seen some incredibly bad choices that were made by architects.
Okay, nuff said. It's really not worth arguing about.
