really sucks.
The cooktop burner, my first time using a glass cooktop, was impressive. It heated my pasta water about minutes faster than the old Caloric at my condo. Keep a nice rolling boil, no dropoff at all. Very good. Still not fast enough to cool down like gas, but much better than the Caloric
Oven OTH, was a joke. Of course I have twirl knobs for the burners. The oven is all digital. Turn it "on" so to speak and it defaults to 350 right off the bat.Turned up to 375 and it has a rather anal retentive temp display that increases in 5 degree increments until finally it beeps 3x to tell you voila! you are at set temp!
So far so good right? Well, not exactly. I placed one rack wayyy at the top just under the broiler elements. The second rack I put 2 notches from the bottom of the oven. Made my usual garlic bread. Put it on the Mirro pizza tin I have used for years. Covered the tin with aluminum foil, like I have for years. In the Caloric, about 10 minutes total for both sides to be nice and brown. Not so with the Whirlpool. 6 minutes into the baking, the bottom of the bread is barely brown. In the Caloric, it would be almost black. Turned it over. Waited 4 more minutes. By now, my pasta is done, draining and getting cold. Screw this, I pulled out the manual to figure out how to get the broiler elements to work, and finally after 5 minutes of reading, I got them going and had the bread browned in no time flat.
I know it is new and I need to experiment but I woulda thunk that simple to brown garlic bread with butter and oil would be a piece of cake. I was wrong.
While the cooktop performance was impressive, the oven performance is not. I suspect the thermostat is not calibrated correctly. In other words, the display might say 350 but I am willing to bet I'm at least 25 degrees below what it actually says. Tomorrow I will figure out how to calibrate the thing so I can at least bake some things before the sun goes down.
The cooktop burner, my first time using a glass cooktop, was impressive. It heated my pasta water about minutes faster than the old Caloric at my condo. Keep a nice rolling boil, no dropoff at all. Very good. Still not fast enough to cool down like gas, but much better than the Caloric
Oven OTH, was a joke. Of course I have twirl knobs for the burners. The oven is all digital. Turn it "on" so to speak and it defaults to 350 right off the bat.Turned up to 375 and it has a rather anal retentive temp display that increases in 5 degree increments until finally it beeps 3x to tell you voila! you are at set temp!
So far so good right? Well, not exactly. I placed one rack wayyy at the top just under the broiler elements. The second rack I put 2 notches from the bottom of the oven. Made my usual garlic bread. Put it on the Mirro pizza tin I have used for years. Covered the tin with aluminum foil, like I have for years. In the Caloric, about 10 minutes total for both sides to be nice and brown. Not so with the Whirlpool. 6 minutes into the baking, the bottom of the bread is barely brown. In the Caloric, it would be almost black. Turned it over. Waited 4 more minutes. By now, my pasta is done, draining and getting cold. Screw this, I pulled out the manual to figure out how to get the broiler elements to work, and finally after 5 minutes of reading, I got them going and had the bread browned in no time flat.
I know it is new and I need to experiment but I woulda thunk that simple to brown garlic bread with butter and oil would be a piece of cake. I was wrong.
While the cooktop performance was impressive, the oven performance is not. I suspect the thermostat is not calibrated correctly. In other words, the display might say 350 but I am willing to bet I'm at least 25 degrees below what it actually says. Tomorrow I will figure out how to calibrate the thing so I can at least bake some things before the sun goes down.