Lately some very nice high efficiency LED light bulbs have come on the market. For example, FEIT (from Costco) has a 100 watt equivalent (1500 lumen) daylight LED bulb for $5 and it uses only 14 watts. It's not "true color" and the CRI isn't listed, but my impression is that it's probably round 80. Their warm white bulb is even brighter, at 1600 lumens and 17 watts. However the warm white bulb has a lot of RF interference, so in various spots I've had to replace it with two 60 watt equivalent bulbs on a splitter instead, which don't cause RF problems. An advantage to the 60 watt warm white version is that it's also "True Color", with a CRI over 90. That is nice. The draw back is that each 60 watt bulb uses 9.5 watts, so two together use 19 watts. But what the hell, it's still a lot less than 100 watts.
I figure the RF interference must have something to do with the higher efficiency designs using high frequency voltage modulation to get more output and less heat from the diodes. It might be a good tradeoff for a workplace or other areas where one may not be wanting to listen to FM radio, but it's a problem in most areas of my home.
Anybody else have similar problems with the new higher lumen output LED bulbs?
I figure the RF interference must have something to do with the higher efficiency designs using high frequency voltage modulation to get more output and less heat from the diodes. It might be a good tradeoff for a workplace or other areas where one may not be wanting to listen to FM radio, but it's a problem in most areas of my home.
Anybody else have similar problems with the new higher lumen output LED bulbs?