lordkenmore
Well-known member
Interesting piece on C7 & C9 lights. A quote:
-C7 lights are cool-burning, at 5 watts each. They do not get hot and they are no more dangerous on your tree than the little twinkle lights or LED lights.
-They are also energy efficient. For example, you have a six-foot tree. Fifty C7 lights will make your tree look bright and festive. They burn at 5 watts each, so you use a total of 250 watts with the C7 lights. To achieve the same effect with the little lights, you would need to use at least 500 little lights. They burn at 1 watt each, so that's a total of 500 watts; double the wattage you would use with C7 lights. You save energy with C7 lights.
http://www.christmascentral.com/t-Hints-And-Technical-C7-and-C9-Christmas-Lights.aspx
From memory, I'd say C7 does run hot enough to be more of a risk than mini-lights. But how much more of a fire risk? Plus it can be argued that NO light would be the safest.
And I can imagine that it takes a huge number of mini lights to equal a strand of C7 lights.
-C7 lights are cool-burning, at 5 watts each. They do not get hot and they are no more dangerous on your tree than the little twinkle lights or LED lights.
-They are also energy efficient. For example, you have a six-foot tree. Fifty C7 lights will make your tree look bright and festive. They burn at 5 watts each, so you use a total of 250 watts with the C7 lights. To achieve the same effect with the little lights, you would need to use at least 500 little lights. They burn at 1 watt each, so that's a total of 500 watts; double the wattage you would use with C7 lights. You save energy with C7 lights.
http://www.christmascentral.com/t-Hints-And-Technical-C7-and-C9-Christmas-Lights.aspx
From memory, I'd say C7 does run hot enough to be more of a risk than mini-lights. But how much more of a fire risk? Plus it can be argued that NO light would be the safest.
And I can imagine that it takes a huge number of mini lights to equal a strand of C7 lights.