Holy ramp action Batman, an 18lb. "jumbo" Roto-Swirl!

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support AutomaticWasher.org:

kenmoreguy64

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
3,282
Location
Charlotte, NC
I seem to remember some discussion a while back about whether or not there was a large capacity version of the Super Roto-Swirl. Well, I was certain there was, I'd seen it a hundred times in my 1992 Whirlpool parts catalog. When I went to order one last spring though, it had become NLA.

Persistence has paid off as after searching online here and there, I found an NOS Gold large cap. Roto sitting on a shelf.

Here are some pics for comparison - now all I need is a a machine to put it into.

5-7-2009-20-35-34--Kenmoreguy64.jpg
 
One final pic. I love who the incline of the ramp is taller on the big agitator, and how much taller the fins are. Even on high water level, the beginnings of the ramp curvature must protrude a bit out of the water.

5-7-2009-20-40-22--Kenmoreguy64.jpg
 
Hey Gordon....

You can bring it with you when you come out this way and we can put it in my '74 Lady K (or the 1980 - 70 series) to see how it works!!!

Kevin
 
Kevin -

Ok, first thing...I would explain that to airport security exactly how? :-)

I would try it out here if it was that easy though, but I / we need a machine with a "super" tall centerpost. I have only seen two in my life, and they were manufactured from 1968 into 1973 only. From what I have researched, a gargantuan straight-vane agitator graced the first 18lb. machines in 1968. This Roto on steroids replaced it a couple years later. The machines used an extra-tall centerpost and an agitator shaft that is appropriately that much taller in the machine's superstructure (as compared to a standard cap. model). The 1974 and later 18lb. washers had a shortened centerpost, which used the same length parts (spin tube and agitator shaft) as the standard machines, and the two Penta agitators debuted to go with them. These were less wear-prone for the transmissions. Some of the 1972/1973 large cap. models were re-designed internally to have the shorter posts and Pentas before the 1974 line came out.

The results of my research shows only five Kenmore large cap. models that would accomodate this agitator, the 1968-1972 Kenmore 518 (the infamous Frankenmore), a 1972 400 and 600 series machines, and 1973 500 and 700 series machines. I am unaware of the Whirpool models, however I sold a 1969 Whirlpool with ginormouos black Surgilator back in 1997, and an LAA7800 from 1973 a few years earlier. Those are the only two I've seen.

If we try to put this agitator in your Lady K or my 1977 Kenmore 70 for example, it will simply fall all the way to the bottom of the basket without installing onto anything unless I transplant a tall-shaft transmission.
 
wow...those ramps really climb high on that one...thats the problem when most manufacturers increased their capacity the only thing they did was add a few inches to the agitator post but not increasing the vanes to come up higher also...as in a maytag standard compared to a large capacity...the base is exactly the same just the post is taller...also the timer wash time settings should be increased because your washing a little larger load and may need a few minutes more...funny though that my digital machine with the standard tub allows me to have a 19 minute wash...just food for thought
 
Congrats on finding the large cap RotoSwirl. Those vanes really are tall, and they look like they are in good condition. Hopefully you will get to watch in action pretty soon.

Have a good one,
James
 
WOW!!!

I've always tried to imagine and even draw what the Roto-Swirl agitator would look like with the 'swirl' extended higher on the column. This is the real 'SUPER' Roto-Swirl agitator and it's PERFECT. So cool to actually see it. I would LOVE to see it action. How tall is it?
 
That looks like the agitator that was in my friends Lady Kenmore he sold in the early 2000's. To this day I still don't know why he sold the set since they both worked perfectly. I know someone on here would have killed to get them lol.
 
I remember in the big Sear's books in the late 60's early 70's the Large Capacity machine's usually had 2 models and were lumped in with the portables and special installation machines. i wonder if this big RS is from back in those days?
 
alr2903 and Matt:

alr2903 -

You remember exactly right. The large cap. machines didn't become mainstream until 1974 or so. The most I ever saw in a catalog of the previous jumbo machine was three models. Of the four 1972/1973 models, three had Kenmore's pot-metal consoles of the time, and one had the plastic top with removable control insert.

Matt -

I may have a lead on one machine, but it needs a resto, and I'm not sure if it's a tall post model or the revision that came later in 1973 which had the Penta-Vane (this agaitator wouldn't fit if that's the case).

Time will tell, but I hope you're right Matt! That would be a real find for me.

Gordon
 
Digital Maytag's -

(sorry to drift)
I'm going to briefly chime in on this - Jed is correct that Maytag increased the OPM from 54 to 63 OPM's, originally for the Big Tub machines in '66, then later for all the automatics. Along with the change from the fixed fin to the Power Fin on the aqua agitators it helped move the load around down by the base in comparison to the earlier machines. One of the major problems that I've seen on the earlier machines is it would drag heavy loads against the tub and wear down the finish.

The original LSE1000 does have the standard capacity tub and helical transmission; the A9900/LAT9900/LAT9904AAE machines have the Big Tub along with the orbital transmission. Both machines, the stacked washer/dryer and the 9000 series washers, do have an adjustable wash time allowing the user to program the wash up to 19 minutes, and the rinse, IIRC, to 7 minutes.

Ben
 
as tall as these...

Isn't the large capacity SUPER Roto-Swirl agitator the same height as the bakelite 'Pregnant' Roto-Swirl, original Straight-Vane, Super Surgilator and the gold Roto-Flex agitator(s)?

5-10-2009-21-01-56--scrubflex.jpg
 
I doubt it........

I doubt it because those agitators are all for standard capacity machines. The large capacity Super Rotor Swirl this thread is about is for a LARGE capacity machine (read: deeper tub).
 
Well, I seen a photo of a pregnant roto-swirl next to a roto-flex and the size difference was the same as the standard size roto-swirl next to the SUPER roto-swirl.
 
Harry -

All four of those agitators in the pic utilize the same transmission & agitator shaft length. Given the proper splines and drive blocks, they are all interchangable in a standard capacity machine. If you feel the pregnant Roto-Swirl is the same height as the large capacity Super Roto-Swirl, you are looking at an optical illusion.

A standard Whirlpool Super Surgilator is 2.5 inches shorter than it's tall-shaft large capacity counterpart (15 3/8" vs. 18 1/8").

Check out my pictures below. In the standard capacity 1976 Green Kenmore, which normally houses a straight vane agitator, you'll see the white standard super Roto has installed perfectly.

The stud protruding through the agitator is ready for the cap to be installed.

5-11-2009-00-33-39--Kenmoreguy64.jpg
 
Now for comparison, placed in the machine is a pregnant Roto-Swirl, courtesy of my 1961 Kenmore 70. It does not sit any higher than the bakelight super, or the white super. It would install perfectly given a drive block.

The pregnant Roto-Swirl from automatics (not from wringers) and the Super Roto-Swirl (standard) are always interchangeable.

5-11-2009-00-38-22--Kenmoreguy64.jpg
 
Back
Top