In your opinion.....
Anyway, again, regarding versatility and heat control, I found heat control and response to be as versatile as with gas, you can control temperatures just the same way, but for versatility in cooking what I meant is that you cannot do all what you do with gas or convention...ie what said before, and have no other words to describe it.
Regarding food tasting differenf, again, maybe it's just me...but found it being different, not funny but different...it was cooked differently, tasted differently, probably the same way I find food cooked on a wood stove to be better than one cooked on gas...but I swear it was different to my mouth!
Do not know the type of cooking you do and how you do anyway, so I do not expect every one to understand what I mean....
Regarding pot heating, really I knew it very different, if it was just "pot content" ie supposed to be food, heating up, you would not be able to roast ,toast or brown....
And would be a kind of microwave no? , i have always known, and heck, could see with my eyes it is the pot or pan getting hot! Radiation heats up the pot base and of course thanks to it food in it contained to be cooked. Am I wrong?
[this post was last edited: 5/3/2014-15:50]