whirlykenmore78 Well-known member Platinum Member Joined May 5, 2011 Messages 2,788 Location Prior Lake MN (GMT-0500 CDT.) Mar 10, 2014 #2 We don't see these that often. While the later MT Jetclean based JA DWs were exponentially better at washing and more reliable. It is a unique DW nonetheless. WK78 http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/hnp/app/4369052833.html
We don't see these that often. While the later MT Jetclean based JA DWs were exponentially better at washing and more reliable. It is a unique DW nonetheless. WK78 http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/hnp/app/4369052833.html
appnut Well-known member Platinum Member Joined May 20, 2001 Messages 19,660 Location TX Mar 10, 2014 #3 NO JET-CLEAN NOPE. That's part of their low-end line that was sourced from GE.
whirlykenmore78 Well-known member Platinum Member Joined May 5, 2011 Messages 2,788 Location Prior Lake MN (GMT-0500 CDT.) Mar 10, 2014 #4 Right Bob All i was saying is that the MT JAs worked much better. They had the Jetclean module. The MT sourced DW's were much better. WK78
Right Bob All i was saying is that the MT JAs worked much better. They had the Jetclean module. The MT sourced DW's were much better. WK78
appnut Well-known member Platinum Member Joined May 20, 2001 Messages 19,660 Location TX Mar 10, 2014 #5 Nick, I apologize. Scanned your comment so quickly, I didn't fully comprehend what you were saying.
DADoES Well-known member Platinum Member Joined May 21, 2001 Messages 15,817 Location TX, U.S. of A. Mar 11, 2014 #6
DADoES Well-known member Platinum Member Joined May 21, 2001 Messages 15,817 Location TX, U.S. of A. Mar 11, 2014 #7