New Photo Thread

[kenmore1978]

2nd pic

and me at Christmas 1996

 

[david]

Me and the little woman

Can you stand one more. Here we goooooo!

 

[veg-o-matic]

Bumpity-bump.

C'mon you guys--there are still a lot we haven't heard from.

Don't make me name names!!

 

[kenmore1978]

Digital camera price/quality

"I agree with you - scanners are nothing nowdays, but even then, you can get digital cameras for virtually the same price now, at least over here in the UK."

Sure, you can get a "cheapie" digital camera, but I'm picky about my quality, photograph being one of my hobbies. I'm holding out for 35mm quality, which calls for 5 megapixels or above. Those digital cameras are still in the US$400 and up range. When a 5 megapixel camera gets down into the $200 range, then I'll go for it. Inthe mantime, I'll stick with film and just have the pics put on CD when developed. In concession to the digital world, I only pics on CD and negatives now when I develop film. I figure if I really need a print, I can either print it myself, ot take the negatives/CD to photo place and have a print made. Cuts down the price of processing. Ultimately I'll probably have a "point & shoot" digital camera of around 3 megapixels, and a 5 megapixel or above SLR

 

[jasonl]

Groovy Kenmore1978

I dig the glasses in the 1968 page.

I love 60s/70s pictures.

I have a Canon Powershot A75 or something like that. It was like $300 at BB. It takes the best pictures I've seen in a low priced cam. It has "Point and shoot" but you can also make manual settings. It has all the useful features, such as red-eye reduction, auto flash (which likes to turn on even if there's sufficient light :-?). Those pics of Bri were taken with that camera so you can use those as a reference.

 

[automagic]

I love picture threads

Every one looks so cute.
Here is a pic of me after a friends wedding last Nov.

- Donnie

 

[kenmore1978]

glasses

I wore glasses from the 5th grade up until about 4 years ago when I switched to contacts and went with the "Kojak" look (since I was going bald anyway) on the recommendation of friends. Everybody says it's a much better look now.

Those little point and shoot cameras are really nice, more features tahn ever for the price. You might be able to turn off the flash if you deem there's sufficient light, and save your battery power. Often those cameras are programed to flash even in sufficient light in order to a "fill flash" fucntion on people's faces.

 

[foraloysius]

I guess some of you already have seen a picture of me in the past, but here's a recent one. Most of the time I wear glasses, but not at home.

 

[foraloysius]

And here's one from the time I was still cute LOL

 

[kenmore1978]

ohmigod, what happened?

Just kidding

Actually, that (adult) picture of you is the best of you posted so far.

 

[maytagbear]

Oh, come on, Louis!

Good looking then, good looking NOW.

Lawrence/Maytagbear

So far, not an unpretty one in the bunch!

 

[re563]

Ok, so I decided it was time for me to stop learking in the background and let you all see me. I Just took this one in my home office while I'm suppose to be working, it's not very good

 

[DADoES]

 

[westytoploader]

Can't believe how small Casey & Abby were considering how big they are now...LOL! They sure do look like they were a handful when they were little!!

 

[DADoES]

As if they aren't handfuls now. Talk about getting run over and licked to death . . . weeeeoooo!!

 

[appnut]

Luigi, you still one great lookin' dude.

 

[DADoES]

10 years ago.

 

[appnut]

Glenn, I think you've both gotten better looking with age.

 

[veg-o-matic]

Is it just me, or does Glenn look totally different in each picture??

As for me, I always look the same.

Tant pis.

le veg

 

[DADoES]

Each picture? I'm only in one picture thus far in this thread. Are you comparing to pics in another thread?