I'm Partial....
....To vintage stuff, for several reasons.
First, I like the look better. Or perhaps I should say looks? The rounded corners of Truman-era styling, the crispness of the Sheer Look years, or the chrome-y glamour of the later '60s and early '70s are all attractive to me.
The quality of vintage is higher, almost every time. The weight of a 1955 stove versus a modern one is, well, no contest. Gauges of metal are thicker, handles and knobs generally more substantial, porcelain instead of paint commonplace. Backsplash and control markings are usually molded in or printed into porcelain or protected behind glass, not just silk-screened on like today.
And there's the electronics question. Today's feature-rich appliances depend on electronic circuit boards, which are vulnerable to heat and moisture - which are two of the main byproducts of stovetop cooking. Steam from pots and pans rolls right over the clock/timer assembly of most modern ranges, and it can't be doing that assembly any good. Vintage ranges depend on robust electro-mechanical timers that aren't nearly so sensitive.
You can get almost anything vintage that you can get new - slide-in, drop-in, built-in, stainless, self-cleaning, you name it. You just have to want it bad enough to search for it, and my experience is, if you search for it, you WILL eventually find it.
My two cents -