electron800
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 252
What I have a problem with is the attitude that front loader
Well in terms of water and energy consumption they are superior.
If energy and water resources continue to be depleated as they are, they will be inevitable too.
Some of the claims made here are rediculous.
I suppose I should just feel honoured that I am allowed to discuss my "inferior" front loader here.
I'm sure toploaders do a very good job, just as front loaders do, but it is undeniable that they use much more water and energy to do so, and that this is a drawback, not a positive.
Wasting rescourses is NOT a choice, its something we must all try to do. I don't see the problem with the government getting rid of modern toploaders, they have introduced an alternative which does the job using far fewer resources and are therefore phasing out the older technology.
It's not as if they are coming into your homes and hauling your older top loaders away. Then I would understand all this fuss about it.
Matt
Well in terms of water and energy consumption they are superior.
If energy and water resources continue to be depleated as they are, they will be inevitable too.
Some of the claims made here are rediculous.
I suppose I should just feel honoured that I am allowed to discuss my "inferior" front loader here.
I'm sure toploaders do a very good job, just as front loaders do, but it is undeniable that they use much more water and energy to do so, and that this is a drawback, not a positive.
Wasting rescourses is NOT a choice, its something we must all try to do. I don't see the problem with the government getting rid of modern toploaders, they have introduced an alternative which does the job using far fewer resources and are therefore phasing out the older technology.
It's not as if they are coming into your homes and hauling your older top loaders away. Then I would understand all this fuss about it.
Matt