Over 5 Years Later, I'm Ready to Run the Unused 1962 General Electric Filter-Flo

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

The problem isn't young kids, I'm on the younger side, the problem is the stuff just isn't built as well nor is it built to be cost effective to repair (and I'm one to garbage pick things and try and repair them).

I recently scrapped a GE front loader and Haier top loader. The GE had a bad bearing and ripped up the front door seal. To be honest the machine was heavily used. I bought it on clearance for $400 back in 2009. I just don't see the return on investment of throwing $200 at a machine used as heavily as it was if I fix it myself. It's half the original investment. When I throw stuff out I strip it, saving anything I could possibly use, and it was overly difficult to disassemble to make a complex repair practicle, and used tons of plastic.

I also recently scrapped a 5 year old Haier toploader. The pump went twice. I paid $200 for the washer (it was a higher end model but I got it through a surplus liquidation place). How many $35-40 pumps is it reasonable to toss at it. I stripped it that one too and the construction quality was poor.

The replacements I bought a few months ago were a Speed Queen and TOTL Samsung Addwash (not the first choice but it had a slight dent in the top and Sears clearance it out for $499). I always keep a top loader and front loader.

I know how the Speed Queen is built but the TOTL Samsung should be an interesting test. It washes well but I'm left wondering how durable it will prove long term. It seems flashy but I have serious doubts about the construction quality. I have a sneaking suspicion it will last a few years and be more cost effective to replace than repair.

The machines are delivered to achieve a price point for the feature set the deliver it seems. As long as they outlast the warranty that's all that matters.
 
Robert

I remember when you had posted about this machine back in 2011.  Reviewed the thread and was in awe about the never used find.  

 

Looks like fun!
 
Awesome Robert! That washer is clean and beautiful. Simply amazing. Good luck on the first run. Looking forward to the pics.
 
OMG... the Excitement!

I think I may have just pee'd a little!

Malcolm

( curious about those three position rocker switches, is the uppermost position horizontal or is the middle position horizontal? )
 
Malcolm

Uppermost position was horizontal.  Some switches were 3-position and some were 2-position.

 

I believe the water level designations were:

Top:  10-12 lbs.

Middle:  6-10 lbs.

Bottom:  6 lbs. and less.

 

Wash temp designations were:

Top:  Hot.

Middle:  Warm.

Bottom:  Cold.

 

Rinse temp designations were:

Top: Warm.

Bottom:  Cold.

 

Speed designations were:

Top:  Normal.

Bottom:  Gentle.

 

lawrence
 
Hey Robert, does the 62 have a spray rinse during the first spin? I wasn't sure what year GE added that and discontinued the "suds kill" pause.
 
Hey Robert, does the 62 have a spray rinse during the first spin? I wasn't sure what year GE added that and discontinued the "suds kill" pause

Yes they added that in '61, it's a feature of the perforated tub models.
 
Robert, why yes indeed.  I think you will keep that bakelite activator and the filter pan unused.  I hope you decide to use the GE and enjoy it when you are ready. A 
 
La flume de ma tante

I've used so many Filter-flo washers that I will say that the quality of the spray rinse depends on a couple of factors. First of all, the fill flume on the solid-tub machines, pre-1961, had a well-designed, compartmentalized, hard plastic flume that diverted some of the water down into the outer tub to do the suds kill, so the fill/spray stream was very neat and directed and didn't hit you in the face. It also had a diversion for the TOL models to feed the rinse dispenser.

 

The soft rubber flumes on the perforated tub models were aimed a little bit into the washbasket balance ring and the clothes retainer ring so a lot of the water would splatter like an old man pissing and some of it would go down into the outer tub; I never understood why they made the thing so messy compared to its predecessor. Also, on one or two later machines the flume was aimed/mounted poorly so that most of the spray rinse water missed the spinning basket and ended up going down the outer tub.

 

One's water pressure also made a big difference. Growing up, our FF was on the fourth floor and the pressure was so low it took nearly 11 minutes for the machine to fill the tub on anything else than the WARM water setting.

 

I love how the nozzle/flume materials on Robert's unused machine actually have some shine to them.

bajaespuma-2016113011532808739_1.jpg
 
Not to Hi-Jack the GE thread, but WP built BD washers had the fastest fill of any Automatic Washer I have ever seen, when set for warm water fill they filled at 8-10 gallons per minute, and a warm spray rinse was this same rate of fill, this is why WP pulsed the spray rinse, otherwise the fill rate could easily overwhelm the pump out ability.

 

Back to the unused 1962 GE FF washer, have you fired it up yet Robert ?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top