POD APRIL 7 2011

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

appnut

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
19,655
Location
TX
The Lady Shredmore!!!  Talk about a shock to open the POD and to see that especially so early in the morning.  Purchased the first month they were on the sales floor, Octoberr, 1986.  I was so imipressed with the demo at the store of the turnover of the load.  The clothes movement reminded me so much of a Unimatic washing, and it did kinda sound like it.  Little did I know how much UNLIKE a Unimatic's gentleness would this machine be.  It sits in my garage.  Replaced by the Fridgemore October 2007. 
 
Shredmore

You know Bob,
Before I stumbled upon AW.org, I had been using the Shredmore that is here where I live. Every so often I'll throw a load of Car Towels in it and it truly does beat the crap out of those towels. But I watch my friend Overload that thing and it's amazing how the DD coupler link has never broke yet.
 
Sorry to have given you such a shock so early in the morning Bob :-)

 

I could be wrong, but I believe this is the very last Lady Kenmore.
 
I belive Robert is correct....last of the Lady K's.......I got mine too when they first came out, in Platinum, for the same price I could of had the discontinued Electronic version in Black, last belt drive, but the DD was so appealing.....but know now I should have gone back to a belt drive....
 
OMG!

This is the dryer I grew up with! It was paired with a BD Whirlpool washer until I was 6, then the washer was replaced with a TOL Kenmore washer with the flushed dispensers. (Not the electronic version, one step down.) We had that set until January 1st of 2003 when we moved the laundry room and got the first generation Duet set. Both the washer and dryer were still working. The washer had the timer replaced at one point but the dryer never had a single repair! I miss both those washers and that dryer dearly! The Duet washer was replaced in December of 2010 when the spider assembly broke during the spin cycle (scared the crap out of my parents) and the Duet dryer is still running strong!
 
Lady Kenmore

Seems like I've seen a much newer machine with the LK label before? I'm not sure of how new it was but it was all white with no wood trim or anything. Still sort of had that squarish console shape though.

 

-Tim
 
Ah yes, this machine

It's a very nice, reliable machine. As long as you don't overload it, or wash things in it that will fall apart on the cottons/sturdy cycle, it's a very good machine. Too bad this one had to go, to what I thought was a good home.

supremewhirlpol++4-7-2011-12-04-40.jpg
 
Last Lady Kenmore ??

I am not certain if this is the last LK model or not. If you look in the ad, you can see the basic stock number for a white non-suds machine is 26921. The 6 makes this a 1986 model just at Bob said. The previous belt-drive Ladies were 23921 and 25921 (1983 and 1985 models, but one had more porcelain than the other and were available together).

The whole line was new in 1986 DDs, from BOL to the Lady. Therefore, not many models came out as 1987 models. But there was a largely all new 1988 line, though they look exactly the same. An '88 model would be a 28921.

I will check my KM/WP parts catalog later tonight and see if there was a 28921 or later machine that appears to be a Lady. I know this basic console survived unchanged through the '92 models. With the '92s they developed the "Heavy Duty" and separate Normal cycles, and within a year or so the panel became all black instead of three tone with woodgrain, then they debuted the all-white or all-almond consoles. I had thought the Ladies made it to the early 90s.

Again, I'll check when I get home.

Gordon
 
Well Pierre, you can have your top loader.  THIS is the machine that killed me ever wanting another top loader again because it's too damn rough.  Because of this direct drive, and to remain cmpetitive, this design is what forced Maytag to go to the new transmission with the fast short stroke.  The new plastic GEs also went with very fast short stroke.  The Amanas and SQs at the time were crap because of seals giving out.  There weren't any choices.  I've not had one sweater, one other piece of clothing ruined like I had with this machine.  The only reason it's still in the garage is becausee it has the LIK moniker on it. 

 

Gorgeon, I vaguely remember seeing a DD sries (with the monochrome panels) at Sears and it had a little light over the timer dial.  Early 90s???  I know it had a 90 on the panel, but I don't remember if it still had LK on the panel. 

 

It was an "improvement" for fabric care when they separated Normal from heavy  Duty Cycles.  Friends of mine had one of those monochromatic paneld (actually white & blue lettering) with the rearranged cycles.  every time I was over at their house, they were using the Perm Press cycle.  Had predominantly gentle agitation with a little bit of fast.   I cannot tell you how many times I saw their machine, along with numerous other people who had these washers with the "modified" cycles or the speed selector switch which had Normal as being slow wash/fast spin--who put too many clothes in a load for this machine to handle at the gentle agitation speed.  You needed to compensate for slow rollover to get decent washabioliity.  Thus not using machine's capacity to save on fabric damage, but you ended up wasting all that much more water.  Sucks big time!!!  NO THANK YOU at all.   I have a friend of mine who has a family of 6 at home.  Her dryer failed and she wanted a new pair.  Ended up getting a new Maytag frontloader pair.  She aws so excited, her water bill went down by $25, and that wasn't even a full number of days in the typical water billing cycle from when the new washer was installed.  She cannot wait to see how much less her water bill will end p being as well as reduction in her water rates as well as sewar rates because of the lower consumption of water. 

 

I cannot tell you how many people I knew, taht when they found out I loved washers, would complain about these early DD washers being so rough on clothes.  I'd tell them the solution, do most everything on delicate because it was too rough and beat evgerything to death.  A few cussed whirlpool out for making such a crappy design so harsh on fabrics.

 

and the dryer lasted only 8 years.  It seems the high end Kenmores, and I found this out from Gansky after discovering the club, had different motors in those high-end dryers which ended p failing.  Mine seized with a shriek.  When the dryer had to be replaced, was almost cheaper to buy a new one, I lost my matched almond pair.  I've had the Maytag Dependable Care since December 1994 and nary a problem, not even scortched mattress pad like I had with my GE dryer. 

 

Does anyone get the idea there is no love lsot for me and this dman washer?

 

 
 
Some of the monochrome console TOL DD Kenmores did have "Lady Kenmore" on them. I had a TOL LK 90 series with ALmond console/light above the timer and cabinet with 3 speed motor. My only guess as to the year was ~93-94. The consoles were totally changed in ~95, 96. In fact some of the later 90 series machines with the monochrome consoles did not have the triple dispensers. I say those machines had to have been'95 machines, as in '96 the the console went to all black, was more curvy, and had the White cheapened Kenmore logo on it.
 
That's ok Bob, You have no love for this washer like most people here no love for WCI built Frigidaire machines, like I have no love for Calypso washers.
 
DD contented

Our '96 90 series has never had a repair other than a new trans (under warranty) in the first 6 months b/c it would'nt neutral-drain 1/2 the time. Yep,you can murderize the clothes if you don't watch it. But,to get 15 years of service & the ability to roll over big loads if needed,I'm impressed. More $$ to spend on clothes,which my wife usually gets tired of way before the DD beats 'em to death.
Nothing new impresses me anyway,except the Speed Queen TL's & the new WP/KN belt drives. I'm not sure they'd make 6 years trouble-free,so I'm hangin w/DD.
 
console and logo designs

I was working at Sears BC in the mid 90s and I believe it was late 96 into 97 when the then new Kenmore logo and "curved top" consoles on the Kenmores arrived. My parents had a 90 Series that still had the squared off console like the POD and they bought theirs in late 95. Their console was white to match the color of the machine. The knobs looked the same, only theirs had a knob which let you choose the speed regardless of cycle. 6 positions- Handwash with intermittent, handwash with slow wash, gentle, normal, heavy, and hang dry. My 02 has the same basic control options the 95 machine had except mine doesn't have variable water level. Both their dryer and mine had the lint filter beneath the door rather than on top. IIRC, most of the Kenmore dryers by the time I worked at Sears had them this way. I had always remembered Kenmore dryers as a kid having the lint screen on the top. Thanks for posting that pic!
 
Isn't that ALOT of money for a washer and dryer for 1986ish? I wonder what that would translate to in today's market? Sears must have made a killing on those machines since the technology was tried and true and not much new except a new color here and there.
 
On Shredmores: Didn't some of these machines (whether Whirlpool or Kenmore) have cycles that utilized two agitation speeds? I seem to have a faint memory that the cycle would start with fast agitation for 4-6 minutes, then shift down to a lower speed.

I also recall that the medium speed (around 120 o.p.m.) on the Shredmores was the fast speed on my circa '89 or '90 KitchenAid.

While I find top-loaders more fun to watch, my daily driver will always be a front-loader. I've listed the reasons why many times. But can a front-loader match the excitement of watching a GM-era Frigidaire, a vintage Kelvinator/ABC, or even an Electrolux-era Frigidaire with an indexing tub? Not in my book.
 
prices

After seeing the price on those machines, I pulled out the salescheck on mine. In March 2002 my Elite(which is what the 90 series had become by then) was $499 and the dryer(also an Elite) was $399. My guess is that in 1986, the appliance market was not as competitive as it had become by the mid to late 90s and especially now. I know when I was at Sears, I believe the electronic 90 Series was typically selling for $599. Our only "big" competitor was Circuit City as Lowes and Home Depot just didn't have the appliance selection they do today. And they didn't have the financing options(0% for a year) Sears did. Today, things are totally different in those areas.
 
Frigilux Shredmore speed shifting

Eugne, these initial version of DD, including the ones that started coming out with the design 2000??? in 1983 or 1984, did not shift agitation speeds in the middle of the wash phase.  That would have helped with the fabric wear.  Initially the soil designations were heavy, noormal, and light.  I tinnk the names eventually evolved to Ex Heavy, Heavy and Normal--Normal being the shortest wash time for both Perm Press and "Normal" cycles.  People were just so used to throwing in a load and washing for 12 or 14 minutes.  I don't even think Whirlpool offered their 'Gentle Wash System" intially on these either.  That was where the normal agitation speed shifted to gentle at about the 4 or 6 minute mark on cycles, just like the early Whirlpools all the way up to the late 1960s.  I think Sears instituted this type of speed shifting later than that.  That's what was utilized before Sears began putting more models with speed control knobs on models and becoming a more common feature. 
 

Latest posts

Back
Top