Yes, when did they first exactly appear (1950-when?) and what makes besides General Electric have them?
And while free-standing ranges with them met their demise, how long had GE stuck it out at least putting them on their countertop cook-tops, as I remember the disappointment of seeing those getting regular knobs?
Also, was the reason just futuristic kitsch? I mean, why couldn't a typical range control panel house as many settings as conventional knobs? (Well, that can clearly be because of lack of space--and the lot of needed wiring being involved!)
Easy to see the discontinuation of them was attributed to the idea of them being hard to clean, accidentally being turned on, and not as incidentally cut off, as you wouldn't want an unattended range to start a fire...
And lastly, going back to the wide range of settings denied, how did this design presumably last as long as it did, potentially requiring a lot of switching to obtain the appropriate current-settings needed often during cooking if the only settings offered were:
-- WARM -- LOW -- 2 -- 3 -- HI -- ????
--And why were they designated as such? The numbers "2" and "3", that is? (Resembling a military "hupp, two, three"?) A Philco electric range, that I saw here, made me think of this & how the "2" and "3" are replaced by a "medium " and "simmer", I think...
A predictably novel, and easily short-lived design, but among the quick obsolescence of what seemed to be the eqivaent of the "touchpad" of its time, I would like to know some more...
-- Dave
And while free-standing ranges with them met their demise, how long had GE stuck it out at least putting them on their countertop cook-tops, as I remember the disappointment of seeing those getting regular knobs?
Also, was the reason just futuristic kitsch? I mean, why couldn't a typical range control panel house as many settings as conventional knobs? (Well, that can clearly be because of lack of space--and the lot of needed wiring being involved!)
Easy to see the discontinuation of them was attributed to the idea of them being hard to clean, accidentally being turned on, and not as incidentally cut off, as you wouldn't want an unattended range to start a fire...
And lastly, going back to the wide range of settings denied, how did this design presumably last as long as it did, potentially requiring a lot of switching to obtain the appropriate current-settings needed often during cooking if the only settings offered were:
-- WARM -- LOW -- 2 -- 3 -- HI -- ????
--And why were they designated as such? The numbers "2" and "3", that is? (Resembling a military "hupp, two, three"?) A Philco electric range, that I saw here, made me think of this & how the "2" and "3" are replaced by a "medium " and "simmer", I think...
A predictably novel, and easily short-lived design, but among the quick obsolescence of what seemed to be the eqivaent of the "touchpad" of its time, I would like to know some more...
-- Dave