Thanks, gents! Joe I was hoping you'd see this post. Yesterday I was thinking about the stories you've told over the years of working at Western and rehabbing Unimatics when these were still just a used washer.
So, yesterday I left it off with the reopperation just about complete, with the next step in the process to do a run-in test of the mechanism. I tried two methods - the first was running on the bench with no tub, and the second with a tub bolted in place. The reason for the second approach was to see if torquing the assembly up against the spin cage washer and the spin bearing would decrease any drag on the overall mechanism (it did not). If you do attempt this please do not install the bronze washer securing the tub nut. I can't imagine having the mechanism free spinning dangerously with a tub installed.
The service manual calls out the normal wattage ranges for a reopperated mechanism, specifying 215-225 watts. I took a page out of David's playbook and grabbed a Kill-A-Watt meter at Menards to bench test the mechanism and see how things were running. This is a brilliant tool - thanks for the tip, David!
Oddly I couldn't get the mechanism to run any lower than say 290 watts, and it stabilized in the 305 to 320 range for both pulsation and spin. What I don't know is if the replacement 70's Delco motor and capacitor are any different than a 50's original, or if the revised oil pump puts more drag on the drive shaft, or if there is indeed something wrong with the mechanism itself (too tight of clearances, etc.). But, everything seems to run fine so I'm leaving things as is. It pulls below the rated 7 amps on the motor tag, so I took that as a positive. [this post was last edited: 12/29/2019-17:50]





So, yesterday I left it off with the reopperation just about complete, with the next step in the process to do a run-in test of the mechanism. I tried two methods - the first was running on the bench with no tub, and the second with a tub bolted in place. The reason for the second approach was to see if torquing the assembly up against the spin cage washer and the spin bearing would decrease any drag on the overall mechanism (it did not). If you do attempt this please do not install the bronze washer securing the tub nut. I can't imagine having the mechanism free spinning dangerously with a tub installed.
The service manual calls out the normal wattage ranges for a reopperated mechanism, specifying 215-225 watts. I took a page out of David's playbook and grabbed a Kill-A-Watt meter at Menards to bench test the mechanism and see how things were running. This is a brilliant tool - thanks for the tip, David!
Oddly I couldn't get the mechanism to run any lower than say 290 watts, and it stabilized in the 305 to 320 range for both pulsation and spin. What I don't know is if the replacement 70's Delco motor and capacitor are any different than a 50's original, or if the revised oil pump puts more drag on the drive shaft, or if there is indeed something wrong with the mechanism itself (too tight of clearances, etc.). But, everything seems to run fine so I'm leaving things as is. It pulls below the rated 7 amps on the motor tag, so I took that as a positive. [this post was last edited: 12/29/2019-17:50]




