arbilab
Well-known member
Mechanicals were reliable.... in the mechanical day. This is the cutcost day, where a junk mechanical is just as likely to fail as a junk digital.
So if you're going to jam digital down our throats as a reliability breakeven, at least make the damn thing programmable. Clever programming costs no more than stupid programming. You have to pay the programmer either way so it's just what you specify you want done.
It's possible to satisfy both customer sets. The ones who want only 2 start buttons (white cotton, permpress) and the ones who want to design their own program. With exactly the same hardware and software cost. Why is NOBODY doing that? Because they're stucking fupid? Yeah, that would explain it.
Because corporations are run by MBAs (which functionally should be called MCCs, Master of Cheap Crap) and MMas (Master of Marketing), neither of which have any concept whatsoever of what the product is supposed to accomplish. And if you try to explain it to them, their eyes roll back in their heads. Trust me, I saw it firsthand, as quality auditing engineer for Dell just before they blew off quality altogether (including me and everyone I worked with) 13 years ago.
The best you can possibly accomplish now is knowing what you want and what compromise best represents it.
So if you're going to jam digital down our throats as a reliability breakeven, at least make the damn thing programmable. Clever programming costs no more than stupid programming. You have to pay the programmer either way so it's just what you specify you want done.
It's possible to satisfy both customer sets. The ones who want only 2 start buttons (white cotton, permpress) and the ones who want to design their own program. With exactly the same hardware and software cost. Why is NOBODY doing that? Because they're stucking fupid? Yeah, that would explain it.
Because corporations are run by MBAs (which functionally should be called MCCs, Master of Cheap Crap) and MMas (Master of Marketing), neither of which have any concept whatsoever of what the product is supposed to accomplish. And if you try to explain it to them, their eyes roll back in their heads. Trust me, I saw it firsthand, as quality auditing engineer for Dell just before they blew off quality altogether (including me and everyone I worked with) 13 years ago.
The best you can possibly accomplish now is knowing what you want and what compromise best represents it.