Spin Speed Measured by Stroboscope!

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Old Strobe Light

One picture with flash, to show the strobe light; one without, to show the fan blade. Low speed on the fan was about 850 rpm.

I seem to remember the spin speed on Blackstones to be in the vicinity of 600 rpm.

blackstone-2014070808245209315_1.jpg

blackstone-2014070808245209315_2.jpg
 
I was wondering, could the reason behind the faster than advertised spin speeds be because the tubs were empty? Or would they spin at the same speeds full of wet clothes? It seems like the added weight would slow them down a bit, but then I'm thinking it wouldn't. What do you think?
 
NEW MATERIAL ! YAY !

Eugene Frigilux ~ the Frigidaire spinning in the 600's is a Pulsamatic, which pulsates and spins at an rpm of 660 ish. The doctrine explains this double 660 stuff. Re-reading carefully I see you got it. There is a reason for the identical speeds, but I don't have it mastered.

Kitty ~ An Easy Spin spins at 900

Guys ~ you look wonderful and it's so nice to have something new under the sun. Though we live and die for Whirlpool/Kenmore, their spinning is truly tragic. Was just lamenting that interesting reality moments ago as I had the whole hood up on the Mark XII spray rinsing
 
Vern,

Ultimate steady state spin speed isn't likely to vary much loaded vs unloaded. Loaded the increased inertia will cause the basket to spin up slower but eventually it will reach the same RPM. The only reasons it wouldn't would be due to increased aerodynamic drag from the clothing or higher bearing drag due to weight or imbalance. If the imbalance is significant perhaps the belt or clutch could slip a bit more which would reduce spin speed. It would be an interesting thing to do to see if theory and practice meet though!

I've had the same discussion with car/motorcycle guys that think a lighter car will have a higher top speed. It will accelerate faster due to the reduced inertia but top speed is unchanged as it is only modified by drag and frictional losses.
 
Actually, Correctoman, Gary just said exactly that.  

 

Message in Photo # 19, the last one of the four great friends, founders,  and REAL bosses of Aworg (although you'd never know it or hear it from them) : You can take being single out of a guy, but you can never take the washer out-- EVUHHHH. 

 
 
mickeyd-- On the Pulsamatic: I'm not quite sure how I missed it the first time.  It's right there in big black letters.  Plus the different agitator should have been a dead giveaway.  I glanced at the cycle dial and just assumed it was a Unimatic.  Sloppy attention to detail = my embarrassment, LOL.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top