I'm with you kevinpreston8
Launderess and retromom, with all due respect, I beg to differ with you both. First of all, I would just like to say that what happened to Steve was sad and tragic. However, Launderess, I believe that you are MISUNDERSTANDING what some posters are saying. Everyone is not saying that Steve "had it coming". What some are saying is that THEY ARE NOT SURPRISED. That is a different observation then he "had it coming", which is very malicious. Not being surprised means that someone who took the risks that Steve took GREATLY INCREASED his chances of being the victim of an unpredictable animal attack. And that is exactly what happened to Steve but they weren't WISHING THAT IT WOULD happen to him. And Launderess, you raised the question about who's to say what's dangerous? Wild animals themselves declare they are dangerous. And, I and a lot of other people on this planet believe them!!! We respect their power enough to keep our distance. Kevin, I saw that video too, the other day, and was horrified with Steve's reckless regard for the safety of his infant son. In another videotape he justified his actions by saying that HE was in complete control of the situation and that his son was in no danger!! One quick thrash of the crocodile's powerful tail could have easily knocked Steve over while he was "walking" his son. There was a rebellious, defiant tone in his voice as he kept saying that HE was in complete control. It's apparent that Steve was starting to forget that wild animals can be unpredictable and should be respected. The very fact that he deliberately put his infant son in a situation where a sudden attack COULD HAPPEN proves it. If Steve wanted to take huge risks with wild animals that's one thing, but his infant son is another person who cannot decide. He had no right to put his son in harms way just because he got the notion to do so.