I just took an Amtrak excursion recently, for the first time in 30+ years. It's not the same, except for the being late part. I know Amtrak has been a losing venture since its inception, it's a pathetic system compared to even some third world countries and kind of an embarassment (we had a British film crew on our return train and I wondered what they thought) but considering that air travel is far faster, more reliable and on time, and that not everyone has the time to take four days to get somewhere as opposed to four hours, you can't expect Amtrak to be much more than it is.
I've always been a train fan. Both of my grandfathers were railroad men in Chicago so we took cross-country trains several times when I was a kid, up until I was 13. By that time, most passenger trains had only a few more years left before they ceased operations.
We had a historical narrator on our return trip advise that in 1952 on our same route, the Southern Pacific's "City of San Francisco," which I have ridden, was buried by an avalanche up on Donner Summit in California. A huge multi-agency rescue effort ensued and there were only minor injuries, but the kicker to his story was that along with passengers, there were 30--count 'em--thirty--crew members rescued! I think on this recent trip I could count them all on one hand. Arlo Guthrie's "City of New Orleans" ran through my head a couple of times.
Any train fans/Amtrak users interested in a thread along these lines? I'd like to know how others feel about today's train travel. I never thought I'd feel this way about trains, but the bloom seems to have fallen off the rose for me.
Ralph