Anyone happen to know the logic behind Maytag's revisions of the "Chime Actuator" in the dryers (DE/DG 806, DE/DG 808, others?) over the years?
The overall bracket arrangement seems to have been designed around a simple bent wire with a screw & nut. Later on, a molded flexible plastic part (nylon?) replaced the wire, and at some point after that (possibly for the -808 dryer?), it was modified to use a metal rivet type of striker, which was curiously designed to be loose with about 0.15" (about 4mm) of back and forth slop.
The bent metal wire seams dead simple, both in design time and in materials/manufacturing. I know plastic injection molding is very cheap at scale, but it also seems like the automated wire bending machine already in use could have churned out a lifetime supply of chime actuators in short order - enough to make the R&D, particularly the mold making, not worth it for a redesign.
So was there some other goal in mind here, possibly changing the characteristics of the ring itself?
Photos of each style attached, the wire one from the early DG806 I parted out, the plastic+screw which recently failed from fatigue in my late-production DE806, and the plastic+rivet bell from an unknown assembly I picked up on eBay... labeled as a Samsung part of all things! (There may be additional variations as well - that's just what I know of.)




The overall bracket arrangement seems to have been designed around a simple bent wire with a screw & nut. Later on, a molded flexible plastic part (nylon?) replaced the wire, and at some point after that (possibly for the -808 dryer?), it was modified to use a metal rivet type of striker, which was curiously designed to be loose with about 0.15" (about 4mm) of back and forth slop.
The bent metal wire seams dead simple, both in design time and in materials/manufacturing. I know plastic injection molding is very cheap at scale, but it also seems like the automated wire bending machine already in use could have churned out a lifetime supply of chime actuators in short order - enough to make the R&D, particularly the mold making, not worth it for a redesign.
So was there some other goal in mind here, possibly changing the characteristics of the ring itself?
Photos of each style attached, the wire one from the early DG806 I parted out, the plastic+screw which recently failed from fatigue in my late-production DE806, and the plastic+rivet bell from an unknown assembly I picked up on eBay... labeled as a Samsung part of all things! (There may be additional variations as well - that's just what I know of.)



