Woo-hoo!
Thank you all for the great posts. Here goes:
Robert--Thank you! :-D I like the metal tub too, and let's face it, we all love turquoise better than white

Yes, if it had the plastic tub it would have been an instant pass-up.
(And if you want a fabric softener dispenser, the GE Filter-Flo fits on there nicely LOL!!)
Jon--Thanks for the kudos :-D! Yes, I agree with you and Greg, something's up with that base-plate/snubber arrangement that's too common for coincidence.
What if WCI and GM were conspiring back toward the
inception of the 1-18 series to at least merge, if not trade hands completely? Hmmm...
The guy getting the head squeeze is my perpetually photo-phobic other half, Will :-D
Peter--I will make a video the next time I have an opportunity to use Ross' camera--I used one for these pictures that has no ability to take movies, but I will get one for you soon.
Austin--Thanks!! :-D Yep, it groans and splashes away, and is very smooth. When I first got it, I thought about your mention of "riding the WCI wave"
I'm glad you mentioned the four-versus-five-vane thing, because Roger and I talked about it the other evening, too. We agree that the four-vanes--which appear in smaller-capacity machines--don't do much in the way of turnover, but the five-vane arrangement is a lot better. Of course, due to the indexing tub, the motion is predominantly round-and-round (you can hold the tub, as you mentioned, but the improvement isn't so pronounced in this machine, except on tinier loads), but when I take a video you'll see items easily disappear down the center, too. Yes, the capacity is quite good on this machine--far better than the GE's, but still slightly less than the 1-18.
The color throws me, but I still suspect this is an early eighties machine...but I'll take the info I have and try to research it and see.
Thank you all again! :-D
--KelviNate