To Elaborate
The Panasonic machine was labelled under several different names (National, Bradford, etc) and sold across the country. While I do think they are neat, I have a 1973 or so Japanese twinny, but there are aspects that are less than perfect as with all machines. I would actually challenge to say that while the machine may be more technologically advanced than an old Hoover, the wash performance may not necessarily be better.
The Jap machines from that era were usually 24", meaning the tub was fairly deep but narrow width and length-wise. The offset impeller can cause an odd waving in the water that can throw a lot of water over the edge if it grabs a large item. Also many early Japanese machines did not reverse the impeller, only one way like a Hoover and tangling could be just as bad. I've not seen many that offer spin-rinsing either. While the brush motor in the Hoover is loud, it is much more powerful than the ~1600rpm direct-drive than the Panasonic would have used. Also the Hoover had a slightly larger diameter spin-basket that spun at ~2300rpm and with a much higher torque-curve for better extraction.
The wash-timer on my Japanese twinny goes to 12 minutes and the spin timer goes to 4. I can place clothes from that spinner into the Hoover and get more water from them even after the 4 minute run. With your machine you wash, drain, fill, rinse (possibly twice) and then spin then drain. That's a lot of time after is all said and done. With the Hoover you fill it, wash (4 minutes max wash) and then spin-rinse while the 1st load is washing. After that you drain and it's done, 30 minutes for a Maytag Big-Load dryer's worth of laundry.
So to the laughable comment, we all have our likes, but that's a bold statement, and one that I don't feel is substantiated.
-Tim