pzelchenko
New member
I have a 50th Anniversary Waring blender. I found it out in the trash and it works fine. It seemed to me a natural thing to turn the cloverleaf beaker over onto the rubber stays on the motor housing to let it drain and dry. However, I see no evidence from patents, marketing materials, Osius, Peter Muller-Monk, or elsewhere that this was a design intent. However, it appears that it would work on many of the cloverleaf designs. Certain early ones (e.g., Muller-Monk's 1937 Model B) have extra-long stays and good motor waterproofing that seem particularly suited to it.
A use-argument stands to reason for this: Finding a safe place to invert a glass blender beaker is always an iffy little project. Why not use the housing as a drying rack? And yet, if this was someone's design intent, it's lost to the world. I'm wondering whether it was possible to do this on at a certain point and whether the functionality disappeared in an iteration. This would be further evidence that it was someone's intent.
I'd like any of you Waring fans to (carefully) try turning the cloverleaf beaker over on the four stays and see if it holds there to drain. If it works, please post a photo, and include information on the model and year. If not, please show me or explain why it didn't work.

A use-argument stands to reason for this: Finding a safe place to invert a glass blender beaker is always an iffy little project. Why not use the housing as a drying rack? And yet, if this was someone's design intent, it's lost to the world. I'm wondering whether it was possible to do this on at a certain point and whether the functionality disappeared in an iteration. This would be further evidence that it was someone's intent.
I'd like any of you Waring fans to (carefully) try turning the cloverleaf beaker over on the four stays and see if it holds there to drain. If it works, please post a photo, and include information on the model and year. If not, please show me or explain why it didn't work.
