War on appliances

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Reply #17

Probably might try putting lower wattage elements in dryers along with putting a 20,000 or 18,000 btu burner orifice in. Thankfully the Maytag HOH dryers already meet these guidelines, especially the ones with the electronic dry control, 4800 watts, too.
 
<blockquote>
Probably might try putting lower wattage elements in dryers along with putting a 20,000 or 18,000 btu burner orifice in. Thankfully the Maytag HOH dryers already meet these guidelines, especially the ones with the electronic dry control, 4800 watts, too.

 

 

</blockquote>
Why though? Americans and Canadians are some of the only people in the world who have the privilege or drying 3.5 cu feet of laundry in under an hour. Why take it away?
 
Restrictions

The one thing here that has not been taken into consideration is that the 3.3 gallons and under is for the Normal cycle with no soil. As long as the soil sensor is able to detect anything, the machine should add another fill for prewash, rinses, etc. As DADoES said, the main wash and two rinses should still be close to 3 gallons. My biggest issue is with the energy consumption. The Normal cycles do not heat nearly high enough, and many new machines are lowering the final rinse temperature to keep the consumption levels low. Alternative cycles like Auto/Sensor usually combat this issue.
I was pissed with the restrictions of 60 gallon hot water heaters at first, however, in use, it wasn't an issue for our family of three considering we had all water efficient machines. Some of the changes are fine, but some are poorly executed. I think that is why there is a lot of resistance.
As someone else mentioned, the dryers are next. I would not be shocked if they start pushing heat pump dryers and lower output heating elements. Though, there was a study that tested the energy consumption of dryer heat settings. The energy consumption between high and low was negligible.
 
I was pissed with the restrictions of 60 gallon hot water heaters at first

 

Is there a restriction on water heaters over 60 gallons? I just installed an 80 gallon in January.

 

 
Disposable

I am more knowledgeable about electronics than appliances, but disposable means these things wind up in the landfill quicker. You won't convince me it doesn't take more time, energy, and resources to repurpose the parts including the large metal panels IF they are even salvaged. 5 to 10 years vs. 20 to 30? I live in a rural area. I am not joking when I say these new washers are one of the most COMMON yard ornament I see. They don't even make attractive plant holders!

Instead of having individual parts to replace, many new electronics require whole parts to be replaced because they are glued, soldered, etc. or have a poor design where one malfunction damages nearby parts. Combine that with the cost to get someone out here to fix it, and you might as well trash it and move on. Appliances, printers, laptops, phones, etc. It adds up!

The HE appliances use more water, electricity, chemicals, and time to accomplish the same thing the older appliances did. Loads are washed twice (more water, more electricity), chemicals added because hot water is limited, etc. They may work out of the box, but it won't be for long...That's a quality control issue that probably wasn't as well addressed back then.

When you look at the WHOLE picture and not only a piece of a puzzle, we are harming our environment.

I am not against making modifications that can conserve water, electricity, etc. as long as the performance of product is not adversely affected. Some parts like drives, memory, battery on electronics, etc. should be easily replaceable and cost effective BY the consumer. Drain pumps, heating elements, and stuff like that on appliances should be easily replaceable and cost effective to encourage consumer to go that route.

I see now they are trying to make dishwashers go from using 5 gallons to 3 gallons? Really? Seriously? People will either run the load twice or start hand washing. It's gone too far. It is one of the reasons I have repaired rather than replaced my now older dishwasher. The first one I had was replaced. I didn't realize the reason it wasn't working was because phosphates had been taken out of detergents. Then I got the "new" one (the one I have now) about ten years ago, and it wasn't much better. I don't know how much water I wasted "washing" the stuff before it even went in the dishwasher. Then I found Cascade Fryer Boil Out. Completely changed everything. It's not really available anymore at a reasonable price where I just need to scrape and rinse, but I do find the Finish tabs work pretty well so time has improved in-store detergents now available. I plan to buy a dishwasher before the new ones start rolling out even if my old one is still chugging along on its last life.

I believe the real savings will be in people being more mindful of how they use the resources they have. I use a spin dryer, which greatly reduces the dry time and can be dried at a lower temp. Run enough water for a bath instead of a full tub, turn water on/off as needed for brushing teeth, showers, etc. Use cooler temperatures to wash lightly soiled clothing, spray rinses instead of full rinses for small lightly soiled loads, limiting the use of vehicle (combine errands when possible), etc. Choose and use more fuel-efficient vehicles for every day use when possible.
 
forced to hand wash dishes

I'd hate to be forced to hand wash dishes, which I ABSOLUTELY hate. That is why I have a dishwasher. The Kenmore that I have in my apartment will be in use by me, and will do the job correctly. It is built by Bosch. I can tell because of the detergent and rinse aid dispensers.
 
Reply # 7

From what I can find electricity usage has leveled off in the past few years, but not down year by year as claimed. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/use-of-electricity.php

Given that usage has at least leveled off, how much of that is in fact due to more energy efficient appliances? How much is due to other factors? How does electricity usage correlate to things like quality of life factors? For instance the home ownership rate reached a high in 2004 and has gone down since then. https://ipropertymanagement.com/research/homeownership-rate-by-year

So maybe people not being unable to afford things they used to may be a factor? Like maybe less durable more expensive junk? Probably a lot of that is due to regulations. So yes, regulations may be working by making people poorer. Homeless people probably don't use a whole lot of electricity, for instance.

To me, whether I can depend on an appliance, or have to constantly have them repaired or buy new ones, is a quality of life issue. Cheap products tend not to be cost effective. I don't believe it's reasonable to think that appliances that have to be constantly repaired or replaced three times as often save energy and resources.

I also notice that while John seems to think flimsy appliances are fine for others, he buys Speed Queen front loaders for himself and brags about their durability. (https://www.automaticwasher.org/cgi-bin/TD/TD-VIEWTHREAD.cgi?93107_77 Reply 21). It may be the repair technician in him speaking, just like on the Appliance Repair Blog / Parts Pros or whatever, when asked who makes the most durable appliances they'll reply "Whirlpool" and never mention Speed Queen because Whirlpool is where they make their money. I'm not sure which I'm more impressed with; John's Speed Queen lasting well over a century, or that he was around to buy it 118 years ago.
 
Repaly 23- Electronics

Electronics by default determine how long a machine will last without repair:

 

 


 

 

Meaning if a circuit board is present, no large group of machines will be able to survive 30+ years. I challenge anyone to discover all the bloated or leaking capacitors within junked appliances.

 

Energy efficiency at least in part put electronics in machines due to the immense amount of logic and control required to achieve reasonable results with less water and energy.
 
Reply #23

That’s what most people don’t understand, they may think they are making a difference but in reality it’s little to no difference at all. If we simply built things to last instead of being thrown away along with using clean sources of power such nuclear, wild, solar, we’d eliminate almost all pollution but everyone simply falls for the bogus nonsense that Big News and politicians put out there.
 
Reply #28

Nuclear is clean since it doesn’t admit any carbon into the atmosphere. Any waste that’s generated by nuclear fuel is minuscule, even if the US was on all nuclear, the amount that would be generated wouldn’t even fill a football field every year.
 
Reply 25 Appliance Life Expectancy

Many washer enthusiasts and Technicians do not use just one washer for its entire life expectancy. They have multiple washers to choose from on a daily basis. If you look through posts, reviews, own experience, ask friends/relatives, you will get an idea of a more realistic was expectancy for typical family use. From what I’ve seen that would be about 15 to 20 for an older good top load. Most likely the transmission or bearings seem to be the issue I’ve seen. A single person or a couple can expect longer.

I believe a realistic life expectancy for my TC5 could be 20 or more years because I have two washers now, was less clothes now, know how to repair minor things, realize it’s better to repair than replace even if expensive to a point. For a typical family, they should get about 15 with correct use and minor repairs.
 
The Point

It’s misleading to suggest an appliance will last lifetimes given the appliances that have an extraordinary lifespan are not being used the way the typical consumer does. Most people have one washer even they are even fortunate to own one or be able to have one.

Educating consumers, building better quality, repair friendly, etc. might actually help save energy and help our environment—the whole picture. Instead corporate greed and agenda that targets only one piece of the puzzle is causing more issues and not in a way that is opposite of intended outcomes.
 
So much crap in one thread

Really, it's all a few searches away.

A full wash - PreWash - 60C/140F wash - rinse - rinse - dry uses 1.2kWh on the Non Sensor normal cycle and takes 2 1/2h.
The one hour wash - if you prefer that - does 150F wash - rinse - rinse - partial dry with 10l in one hour at about the same kWh.
If you let it run until the dry ends with AutoOpen and 5min later the fan turning off, it's about 10min longer.
If you add extra dry it's another 10min I think on top.
Extra clean adds a pre-wash and an extended main wash and is a total max of 1:40h with 16l and 1.4kWh max.
That is not sensor though - that could be easily added in though and could definetly meet that value.

Today. Even at 120V - that adds no time currently since it assumes hot fill.

Nothing has to change, if - especially on the low end - the US appliances must have INSANE markups.
Retail markups are long all but almost gone, the manufacturer does the major cut.
I mean I know my Mieles DW buy in price - the normal sold at price was an insane markup there, but that is high end.
Low end actual profit was maybe covrring operating cost per day at our store. If that. Commissions from other sales and other contract was much much higher.

CO2 production: I partially agree with that.
Appliances SHOULD either get way more green OR last an acceptable time.
However, I can tell you that most major failures in the first 10 years FOR MY SPECIFIC workplaces product category (Built in fridges and freezers and combos for basically all markets except most of the US) is extremly low.

A specific product that we sell medium much off (low to mid tens of thousands) are requiring like 300 door trays of one kind PER YEAR.
Given that is one of the most breaking parts, and it is sold at a few tens of euros, that is NOTHING.
These are the things that can break just by storing something to big like a big drink bottle by just wacking the door closed.
I don't consider that "breaking".
And we do offer compressors for fridges by law for 10 years or more. Even specific sets for in field replacement for ease of installation.

And honestly - that is apparently the hardest to understand - even at inflated prices todays fridges can be had SO CHEAP at AMAZING efficencies compared to even 20 years ago.
Sure it makes production more expensive - but after new efficency classes were introduced - an entirely new architecture was designed, is being prepared for launch in the next few years and that will offer the same efficencies priced like todays products 1 or 2 EU classes lower.

A new factory in Mexico is being built specifically for the US market RIGHT NOW.
That is SPECIFICALLY ment to increase competitiveness in the U.S. market under new regulations.

If you compare prices to like 20 years ago - INCLUDING INFLATION - they should probably all have increased FAR MORE.

One way to keep afloat while paying good wages is either to raise prices - that is not feasable in the low to mid market region.
So - you raise profits by selling products. Since basically every household has every appliance, the replacement rate is basically almost the sales rate.
Every price range has it's own replacement rate and thus projected thus engineered lifetime - at some point, you can't make appliances at a certain quality at certain price ranges.

You'll notice newly classed appliances to suddenly get much cheaper and then suddenly much more expensive.
First people start buying new, better efficency classes. Then the sale from the manufactuer seazes due to regulation, prices drop much lower to clear out stock. As demand outpaces the new limited supply prices increase rapidly to the insane almost collector piece prices.

At that point, the new range sells for the old ranges sale prices at better efficencies.
It goes through the reverse process at the beginning.

But the most amazing thing - new appliances ARE MUCH GREENER OVER THE LIFETIME.

The EPA estimated emission of CO2 per kWh is 0.855lbs.
A fridge apparently produces 400kg per appliance, much higher than washers and dryers at half that.
The source (link below) is probably negativley biased, but let's use the upper limit.
That is 882lbs approximatley. Make it 885lbs for ease of math.
Lets say the usage of the new appliance is by chance one kWh per day - say a fridge.
The old appliance uses 10% more than the new one (keep in mind we could do that easily).
1kWh = 90%
1% of 1kWh at 90% is 0.01111 repeating.
That makes 100% at 1,1111kWh repeating. Cut some slack, make it 1.1kWh.

So, a new appliance uses it's own production CO2 emissions in:
885lbs/0.885lbs per day = 1000 days
Or 2 3/4 years.

At this rate, it still takes nearly 27 1/2 years to offset a new appliance production, yes.
But if your fridge ever needs replacing for any reason that is prohibitively expensive - like a compressor or control board - you can be assured that even running it for "just" 10 years produced more than 3,5 times the CO2 of it's production.

Given that most new appliances ARE replacements, that number suddenly becomes SO MUCH MORE impactfull, especially over their lifetime.

The following is NOT accounting for further decarbonisation in energy grids AND appliances getting even more efficient.
At the 2021 electricity emissions, and the current 2021 kWh emissions, and the Statis date of fridges of the US in 2015 at about 118Mio, if each fridge is replaced by a 10% more efficent model, over a 20 year timeframe constantly at 5%, that switch would cause a cummulative saving over the 20 years of over 95% of the production stage.

Keep in mind - the US is already 10+ years behind the EU in that fridge efficency regard.
In 20 years, we want to have met our emission standards for electricity, the grid won't be any more resilient for sure. We can't decarbonize at the current total energy draw, its basically impossible in that time frame.
Every kWh matters - and yes, even the worser electric cars offset themselfes to CO2 advantage after a couple 10k miles AT CURRENT EMISSIONS.
This switch of fridges basically offsets itself already, at that puny efficency gain, if NO FURTHER REGILATION IS DONE.

That switch can be done, way more is apparently supposed to happen.
Even those maths probably works out, as mind boggling it is.

So yeah.
How often does a DW run? Definetly several times a week.
It's carbon emissions are half of a fridge apparently during production.
Keep in mind all the water purification cost and emissions saved.
Plus any energy.
For what? Something you do maybe once a day that will definetly offset itself nationwide over 20 years - just to unload the DW at a different time, if even that.

 
Fresh and Waste water

Science direct estimates the sum carbon footprint of a cubic meter - supposedly just over 260gal - fresh water purification and waste water treatment at over double that from one kWh.

So yes, that's just about 80 regulation cycles for more than an additional 2kWh of savings.

So quite little, but still quite a lot over the 8.69 Mio DW unit shipments in 2019 according to Statista.
 
Bulging Caps

If the Frigimores, Calypsos, Neptunes, Harmonies, FL Speed Queens, and really any other HE washer had been built purely EM a whole lot of premature failures would have been spared. A Front load spinning at 640 rpm is still more efficient than an equivalent top load washer. A Whirlpool power clean module while using slightly more energy with only 4.8 gallons of water (W-P-R) can handle real world soils much more realistically than a fitter that needs to be cleaned manually. Factor in a motor that doesn't have brushes to wear you're looking at less carbon to build and dispose of in the long term.  Nothing to fail, nothing break, all while preserving resources.

 

 

Here is an example at 1:45 >>>

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

Latest posts

Back
Top