Adobe Flash Player Warning

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

 
Adobe Flash Player is updated quite often.  It's supposed to update itself (unless the user opts during the initial installation to not let it do so) but I've noticed that there may be a lag of a couple weeks or more until an update auto-triggers.
 
Don't really care for Flash

It is like Java, often more bother than it is worth and easily exploited by any script kiddie with a bored afternoon. However have found totally disabling Flash and or seeking prompts before it starts is either annoying or frustrating.

In fact as more and more sites build media content in many just will not work correctly without Flash.
 
wait?

I thought chrome, firefox, edge and IE auto updated the flash player plugin. Aren't they built into the browser, so that if they browser itself is up to date, so is the plugin? I don't have anything standalone flash that I know of....
 
 
Follow the link I posted above.  Click the Check Now button under Step 1 to check what version of Flash is installed.  Check separately for each browser you use.  The current updated version is 21.0.0.213.
 
NoScript & HTML5 for me

SeaMonkey naturally supports HTML5, where Flash might normally be used.

In addition, I take care of "nasty surprises" with NoScript, and only allow pages when stuff starts not working. Aside from some interesting placement issues on "JavaSludge Infested" websites, its great.
 
 
The Time article linked above (and other sources) state that Flash version 20.0.0.306 and earlier are fully vulnerable to the exploit.

Version 21.0.0.182 and later supposedly already have a mitigation that wards-off the full exploit but does cause a crash of Flash content (and presumably the browser).

One source dated today advises that "a patch could be released as soon as Thursday."

Mon ... Tue ... Wed ... Thu

So possibly the latest version available now is not yet fully patched.
 
Once read an Internet security article

Where the author suggested having two computers; one used for the Internet and another that goes no where near. Supposedly one kept important files and so forth on the system that had no access to the outside world as it were.

This "ransomware" is becoming a big thing. Major corporations, businesses of all sizes, hospitals and others are falling prey.
 
I've used the two computer model as described by Launderess, although it wasn't about security on the Internet. It was a factor that the cheapest way I could get Internet support was a used Windows computer, on which I ran Linux. (The choice of Linux was influenced by security, but there are other reasons I prefer to avoid Windows.) But...10 years ago, Linux was more than good enough for Internet--at least for my needs--but I wasn't happy with other applications. So I kept an older Macintosh in service to handle my other needs. Bonus: having a work computer isolated from the Internet means no Internet distractions.

But...I migrated to using one computer that would do everything for me day to day. This became possible because the application software improved for Linux. But another factor became more of a factor: it's harder and harder functioning without the Internet. For example, with writing--a major task I've had for computers since I got my first computer--I use the Internet for research more now. (This is partly a function of what I write.) These days, I seldom print--anything going to others is sent by some electronic system, mostly e-mail. And so it seems a lot simpler keeping everything on one system.
 
I have had periods of not having or using Flash, including recent history. I can't say I miss it. The biggest issue was YouTube, but now it seems like everything on YouTube plays with HTML5. Even years back, though, there were YouTube workarounds. At one point, I was running a PowerPC computer that did not have Flash support, but some Firefox extension allowed YouTube videos to be downloaded, and it was possible play them locally. While that was less convenient, it at least worked.
 
I read that adblock helps a lot too

the addon for chrome firefox, and most all browsers. I'm not sure why? I'm thinking when someone visits a site that has ad's all over it, some of those ad's are flash based, and could contain the virus, and even though you may have flash installed, when adblock blocks the ad, it can't infect you? How true this is, I don't know. But I can say that adblock blocks everything, even youtube ad's...

When I got my new laptop a few weeks ago, I had forgotten to add adblock, and I went to youtube, and I was shocked at all of the ads that I'm not used to.
 
It appears that the hijacking attacks are aimed at Windows 10 users. Another reason not to use Win-10. I tried it last year when it came out, but it kept freezing my computer. Struggled with it for about 10 hours, then got back in thru safe mode and uninstalled 10.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top