And What's GREAT About Today's Cars?

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Old A/C:

Yeah, the old A/C systems were capable of some seriously cold air.

We had a '62 Oldsmobile Dynamic 88 Fiesta nine-passenger wagon for a long time. More glass than your average greenhouse, and the A/C could frost it up in the middle of August. I mean you could probably have hung meat in that car.

One of my teachers had a Studebaker Lark Regal with air, and she refused to use it because it got the car so cold.
 
Hans . . .

There are always exceptions but in general I find modern A/C and power windows to work much better than the old stuff on average. Part of good A/C is being able to control it without freezing you out on a moderately warm day. I don't have a lot of experience with Chrysler products but both the windows and climate control on my mother's '92 Eagle Premier worked very well, pity the rest of the car wasn't as good (engine aside, that was a good one, let's not talk about the tranny . . .).

 

Fastest power windows I've ever seen were on a classic '60s M-B 600 Grosser. This came out in '63 and was M-B's competition to Rolls-Royce: completely hand built to order and costing more than most modest homes of the day. IMO it's a huge and vulgar looking car but they went to the trouble to design a low-pressure hydraulic system to operate the windows and trunklid, I think it operates at about 300 psi. One touch and the window becomes an instant guillotine that is dead silent, and you don't want to have your hand anywhere near an open trunklid if someone pulls the tiny little chrome switch on the rear of the car.

From what I've seen GM did the best and most reliable power windows in American cars though I'm no expert there. Ford wasn't so good; I will always remember my Aunt Carol's '60 Mercury Colony Park four door hardtop wagon. Totally cool car but by '68 to get the right rear window to go up usually took pushing both the door and master buttons and banging on the door. The solution was to not put it down but her stepson always managed to hit the button on a trip to the beach . . . the Colony Park was replaced in ‘68 by a new Chevy wagon without power windows.

I've meddled with power windows in '70s Citroens and de Tomasos and ‘80s Alfas and Fiats. The Ducellier regulators used by Cit and de Tomaso are well made and reliable but very slow, while Fiat used Bosch regulators that are slow and not as reliable. All demand careful adjustment. Things improved during the '80s, my parents had a pair of Peugeot 505s and those worked well, I don’t know who made them. Ditto for my ‘87 Saab 900 Turbo, reasonably fast and reliable. My ‘02 VW is better still aside from the one-touch switch being a maintenance item, but than again VW electrical stuff is famously hit or miss: the English may joke about Lucas being the Prince of Darkness but I think possibly it’s Robert Bosch in disguise, probably why M-B didn’t use electric motors for the 600 Grosser windows in the '60s!

 

Thinking back to the A/C for a moment, my Alfa did have a damned good A/C system, as did my sister's de Tomasos. Since the latter used a Ford V8 the compressor was Ford but the rest was Italian. The condenser sits below the rear license plate and is often mis-identified as an oil cooler. It's not large but has a Fiat radiator fan motor to get adequate airflow from the rear of the car. Still, I'd take the A/C in my VW over any of those.

[this post was last edited: 3/5/2014-20:44]
 
I haven't seen one of those 80s Fifth Avenues in ages, even when new they weren't a popular car here, it was more Caprices, Fleetwood Broughams, and Grand Marquis.

Joe your Buick is gorgeous, and I too love the Buicks of the 50s and 60s, that 58 is lovely but my favorite is the 59 Electra 225 pillarless hardtop sedan

now, some of my favorite things:
electronic traction control
heated and cooled seats
heated steering wheels
rain sensing wipers
panic button on the key fob for locating your car

here is my newest car, a 2008 Buick Lucerne CXL
I also have a 2000 Park Avenue that is my daily driver and a 2000 Taurus wagon since I couldn't find a decent Buick wagon

xraytech++3-5-2014-20-32-33.jpg
 
No FI on these 5th Aves, even though Dodge Trucks with the same 318's were injected by the mid-80s. It would have required a costly EPA certification, and these RWD cars weren't supposed to stay around so long. The only thing that kept them going was:

1) The non-fancy Dodge/Plymouth versions pretty much owned the police market.

2) High profit margins (and demand) on the Chrysler versions.

3) After Chrysler bought AMC, they found themselves with an ancient factory in Kenosha WI that was well-suited to build this old-school platform. With that problem solved, they kept it in production long after anyone expected it to run.

As for being Volare/Aspen based, the main problem with those cars was:

A) In a fit of stupidity, all engineers that weren't dedicated to emissions/regulation were laid off for months during a critical period before the launch. (This was when the company was barely meeting its payroll)

B) They were rushed to market and not "fully baked" for the launch in '76. By '78, the "bugs" were resolved. Production then moved to a MUCH better plant in St. Louis, MO. So really, no worries with this model.
 
this is my daily driver, a 2000 Park Avenue, it has probably one of the last colored interiors in navy blue.
It has 93,000 miles on it, unfortunately the doors are all rusty on the insides, hope to slow that down some come spring

xraytech++3-5-2014-20-34-41.jpg
 
Hydraulique:

Ah, your tales of woe regarding your Eagle Premier bring back some memories.

I had an '89 ES Limited. When it was new and working right, what a dream. A Lexus for half the money.

When it was about a year old, more problems than you could shake a stick at, and you are SO right about the incompetence of the Eagle parts system. Having the car out of commission for three or four weeks over a part was nothing.
 
Eagle Premier

Those were re-badged Renaults that Chrysler was obligated to sell for a few years as a condition of buying AMC. The only way I would imagine parts could have been harder to get would have been if they'd remained serviced only at AMC dealers.

I remember having an automotive electrical class and one of the students asked about troubleshooting an Eagle Premier. The instructor suggested 3 diagnostic tools; comprehensive insurance, a gas can and a match.
 
Sandy . . .

You are so right about the parts problem: nobody in my family will ever own a Chrysler anything again, they were so awful! My mother bought the Eagle new in late '91 in Texas, thank goodness she kept her old Peugeot around for when the Eagle was again awaiting parts. The engine was a gem, made in France and like most French stuff pretty stout although the Chrysler injection and emissions system always had trouble at smog check once the car came to California in 2000. The German ZF tranny was a disaster, dying at 65,000 gentle miles. Chrysler wanted $5000 for a rebuilt and $7000 for a new one plus installation in '99. We found someone who was able to fix it, difficult because few shops wanted to touch it - no doubt they had also dealt with Chrysler's parts department.

 

The sad thing is that my mother liked the car a lot but by the end was totally burned out on it. She actually tried to replace it with a new Lexus but the dealer couldn't deliver a car with both a sunroof and cloth interior (she dislikes leather interiors) so I advised her to buy a Camry for reliability. She ordered a TOL Camry XLE in 2000 and is still happily driving it - Toyota made a customer for life with that car. The Eagle ended out here with my sister, I figured that between Eagle and Dodge dealers I could keep it in parts but was dead wrong, they were as bad here in LA as in Texas. People used to gripe about Fiat parts in the '80s but I had far better luck with Fiat, Saab, Alfa, anyone other than Chrysler.

 

Carmine, what you are saying about the Eagle being a rebadged Renault isn't actually true, it was made only in Canada. The engine was Renault but the rest is not. Thus parts can't be sourced from France for anything other than the engine as it had no direct French equivalent. You may be thinking of the Eagle Medallion, that was sourced directly from Renault.
 
What is so great about new cars? How about reliability! My Dad has told me several times, way back when (50's and 60's) you were lucky to get 100,000 miles out of a car, now you are regularly seeing cars with 200,000-300,000 miles and still going. A good friend of mine has a 96 Nissan sedan with about 240k on it, and it drives like new, everything still works and it doesn't burn a drop of oil. My 2003 Chevy Impala has 175k and also runs/drives like new. I plan on keeping it until 200,000 miles at least, maybe 250k. But then again, I had a 2000 Mazda that was worn out at 120,000. It ran terrible, and burned more oil than gas. The issues started at about 105k and it just started falling apart.
 
With regard to A/C

It went downhill when in the 70's due to engines being strangled for power due to emissions controls, Detroit made the switch to cycling compressors.
Prior to that, the compressor ran all the time when A/C was selected. To regulate the temp of the evaporator both an expansion valve and an evaporator pressure regulator valve worked in tandem to keep the outlet air temp cold without icing up the evaporator. There was also a receiver/accumulator on the condenser side that held excess refrigerant (R12, the good stuff) and prevented it from flooding the compressor. It also had a sight glass so at a glance, you could discern if your system needed a charge.

Examples of these compressors were the renowned Airtemp RV2, the Frigidaire A6 wobble plate, and the York/Tecumseh used on Fords. Sadly, these workhorses were replaced with Sanden/Sankyo, Denso, and Hitachi units that while reliable, lack the gusto to really move the refrigerant. Some units in the larger GM B body cars as well as the "fuselage" Mopars had 3T of capacity believe it or not!

Another factor was the constant airflow going over a properly sized condenser. The fans back then were driven off the water pump and they were either direct drive or had a fan clutch. At any rate, when the engine was running, there was airflow across the condenser that brought the refrigerant back to a high pressure liquid state. One of the most common causes of poor A/C performance was and still is, a dirty condenser.

Of course, R12 while not Oh!zone friendly, worked much better at heat xfer than does R134a. And virtually all compressors cycle on and off apparently to save fuel. The result is a rather uneven temp from the A/C outlets. My current Corolla and prior Suzuki are by far and away the worst performers in this regard. In fact any temp above the mid 80's means I have to use the recirc function in the Corolla to keep the air even moderately cool. Put the thing in stop and go traffic, and performance really tanks. And yes, it is fully charged with refrigerant. That is the nature of the design. The compressor is slightly larger than a beer can and the evaporator core is about the size of a panel air filter. Not a whole lot to provide cooling. And the electric cooling fan pulls just enough air over the whole thing to keep the temp gauge in the normal. No more, no less.

The only vehicle I ever owned that had stellar A/C performance was a 75 Cordoba, sans Corinthian leather. It was a pimpmobile for sure. I even had dice hanging from the mirror. But let me tell you the Airtemp system was the best performing A/C ever. Same with my uncle's 73 Polara. No matter how hot or humid it was, you were comfortable in those cars.

I thought in the late 80's Mopar had a variable displacement compressor on their higher end cars? Not too sure on that one.
 
I will agree that old Frigidaire A-6 is a wonder. It’s crushingly heavy but very reliable and it will sure put out. Even Rolls-Royce used them for years since it was the best that could be made for a large car application.

I’m not as enamored of the York that Ford used. It will indeed put out but seems to have high cyclical loads and takes a lot of power: I’ve watched the idle speed on a Ford 351 Cleveland V8 drop 300 rpm when a York cuts in! The Sankyos seem much smoother, happier to run high RPM and I’ve had pretty good luck with them cooling well though one might not be suited to a Lincoln-sized interior.

IIRC the compressor on my ‘02 VW has some variable displacement system that adjusts capacity as the compressor speed changes; I remember reading a technical description of it. All I know is that it really cools well and fast even in hot temperatures and so far hasn’t demanded any maintenance, something you can’t say for most of a VW.
 
The York compressor was also kind of rough compared to the Frigi. In the Seventies, Lincoln started using the Frigidaire compressor, as I recall, even though it was made by GM.

My '89 Peugeot 405 had a ZF automatic trans that was troublefree. I did change the fluid frequently as insurance.

As for the '88 Fifth Avenue, Iacocca really knew what appealed to old people, didn't he? I wouldnt have been caught dead in one of those back then, but now that I'm older they're starting to look better! Lol.
 
We own an '03 Corolla as one of our cars, and I find that A/C on the really hot Australian days is never lacking, even in Fresh-Air mode at idle. Will easily cool to 68° on the hottest of days.

What seems to help when in any traffic or idling circumstance is giving the car some gas - it raises the engine rpm and seems to increase the efficiency of the A/C. If you have a model with a clutch-fan, you also increase the airflow at the same time, thus cooling the air further.

 

The older Landcruiser we have is also quite good in hot weather, when the thing actually doesn't leak its charge away (Its been to the shop over a dozen times in the last 10 years and NO ONE has been able to find the leak). It doesn't have the electric fan, but a simple direct-driven fan. Works fine, and blows ice-cubes even on hots days. The A/C REALLY takes it out of the Non-Turboed (110hp) Diesel in there though. You can't expect reasonable economy pulling ANYTHING with the A/C on these days.

The car has over 400,000km (~250K miles) - so maybe that explains it.

 

The 93' Bimmer that also hangs around here is reasonable at idle. I don't think that clutch-fan can draw enough air over the car for the A/C to be good in hot weather. Cue the sounds of a RACING electric fan and a squeaky alternator belt... Lol

At highway speeds, the car DOES automatically alter Recirculation rate to some extent, although true climate-control functions only work properly in Fresh-Air mode, which usually works fine at speed, but not speeding-speed...

 

Getting back on topic - Things I like about modern vehicles:

~ Automatic Climate Control (When done properly - mixed air not blowing on your face, ala BMW)

~ Auto-electric windows

~ Extended service intervals (Not the 10-15k miles on BMW from 1990's when Dino-Oil was still used, but today when GOOD synthetics are used)

~ Smooth automatic gearboxes - Not the Double Clutch, Non-Slushbox things... With varying driving habits, they can be "troublesome" and jerky at times (Friends 2011 Ford-Focus)

~ Powerful, yet efficient engines

~ Automatic Intermittent Wipers, Air-Recirculation (Draft-Free)

 

What I don't like:

~ Cars lack individuality (Sounds, Looks, Design etc.)

~ Too many electronic doo-dads... Emissions I can live with - when that extends to ATC, ABS, CSC, DDD and whatever other letter combinations you can imagine, I worry. What if the computer dies in 10 years time? How do I fix these systems? What if the car "loses control" in emergency situations?

~ Cheap, rattly interiors.

~ Cruise-Control controls are not mounted on the indicator stalk, but instead underneath or to the lower side of the wheel, like on a friend's '06-V6 Camry Altise (LE)
 
Automatic transmissions..

IMHO...The best all around gearbox ever made was a Torqueflite, almost its equal would be a C-6 Ford or a Turbo 400 Hydra Matic...for FUN...a pre 1956 Hydra Matic.. they will jerk the paint off the car!LOL, the very WORST EVER, 1961-1964 Olds and Pontiac 4-s Hydra Matic...It was a three speed thing made to be small so the floor tunnel could be lower, ok for someone who drives EASY! but it wont stand up to abuse.."Ask me how I know!" A Torqueflite on the other hand..will take whatever a teenager gives it...how do I know!LOL.
 
I like engine management systems that make newer cars pollute less, perform better, start better and need less fuel and maintenance. But I hate when the "Check Engine" light comes on on many OBD2 cars as they get a few years old! I also like ABS brakes and safety features as well as Bluetooth radios that sync with your phone or Ipod. I don't like FWD cars, transverse-mounted engines, rack and pinion steering, weak FWD transmissions and their limited towing capacity but my daily driver has all these features I don't like as I can't afford any fancy newer all wheel drive vehicle!

 

I don't drive my old cars in winter anymore but I used to and while they started even in very cold weather (I didn't use their block heater), they had some driveability issues while their engines were warming up at -20°F!

I even had a remote starter installed on my 1968 Buick Wildcat along with keyless entry system that I connected to the vacuum-operated power door locks in the late nineties. The remote starter was quite tricky to use and I had to use a solenoid activated by the unused trunk release button of the remote to depress the accelerator a few times to pump the gas and engage the choke/fast idle and to depress the accelerator again after a minute or two of fast idling!  That required recalibration of the high rpm shutoff safety feature of the remote starter to a higher point as the motor would stop when I depressed the accelerator with the factory settings of the remote starter! Making the engine vacuum-operated power locks work with the remote also needed some work but I was able to fix all the small leaks in the system so they would unlock for 2 days after the engine was shut down and I added two electric vacuum valves and reprogrammed the remote control so the impulse for the locking/unlocking sequences would last a few seconds (that was also required for some German cars that had a vacuum/pressure system driven by an electric pump).  I have the same style of power door locks in my 1967 Riviera but I never cared about installing a keyless entry system in it or a remote starter in any other car I had since!

 

I still enjoy using my 1965-75 cars occasionally but I just can't afford it anymore! Those that I have are gas hogs but they don't lack many features from modern cars. My 1965 Buick Wildcat has the mandatory front seat belts, power steering and power aluminum brakes, a variable pitch 3 speed transmission, 2 speed wipers and washer, tilt steering wheel, a remote outside mirror and a day/nite inside mirror, backup lights, chrome plated wheels, front and rear center armrests, a clock, cruise control, a trip odometer,  a two-speaker AM-FM radio, map and courtesy lights, two lighters (that now serve as power outlets!) 6 way power seat,  power windows (and power vent windows), vacuum operated power trunk release, power antenna (that's getting old school as new cars don't have long antenna masts anymore!), a limited slip rear axle and a rear window defogger (blower).

 



 

My 1967 Riviera GS has the previous features (less the trip odometer that wasn't available in 1966-69 Buicks, less center armrests and a 4-way-only power driver seat as bucket seats couldn't get 6 way power like bench seats had). In addition, it also has power disc brakes with 4 piston calipers, vacuum operated power locks, 2 rear seat belts, cornering lights, full instrumentation, console shift, fast ratio power steering, a factory stereo radio and air conditioning with manual controls.

 



 

My 1975 Electra lacks about 1/3 of the power that my older cars have with just 205 horses and 345 lb/ft of torque...It's smog-era 455-4 barrel engine has to move an extremely heavy body and unhappy 2.73 gearing (still has a limited slip axle though), it has no variable pitch torque converter (cost reduction) and no tilt steering wheel (because it has airbags) but otherwise has all the options the Wildcat has. In addition it also has power disc brakes with single piston calipers, an heavy duty 80 amps internally regulated alternator, cornering lights, a 4 speaker stereo radio, a split seat with 6 way power on both sides and seat belts for all 6 passengers, automatic level control, firm ride suspension, a speed alert with trip odometer, a fuel economy gauge (!), a "low fuel" warning light, a headlight-on reminder (buzzer and indicator light) automatic climate control, an electric rear window defogger (not a blower on this one!), dual exterior remote-controlled mirrors, automatic power door locks (that allow to unlock all doors from outside with the key and that unlocks/locks doors automatically as you shift in and out of park), driver and passenger side airbags, 3 speed wipers with variable delay and a mist feature, HEI ignition, door warning lights, an illuminated vanity mirror and a light monitoring system. 



Many idiot lights but still no "check engine" light!



 

Many of the features above are lacking on my daily driver (an already 13 years old base model Camry V6)! The features that I miss the most are the automatic a/c and map lamps... I had these in many old cars but my Camry lacks them, it's also the only car I have that has wheelcovers rather than aluminum or chrome-plated wheels! I also hate the look of most modern plastic wheelcovers! Even old dog dish caps looked great compared to plastic wheelcovers!

philr++3-5-2014-22-58-21.jpg
 
Stan, what's the engine in your '76 Grand-Prix? 350? 400? 455? My father had a '77 base model with the 350 when I was born. the 1973 Delta 88 is one of my favorite Oldsmobiles. 

 

One of the few I saw with the base wheelcovers, a cloth bench seat and no SJ or LJ package.  Here I was 1 1/2 years old with my then 4 years old cousin who's still a great friend of mine!

 



 

My first car ride ever!



 

Well, in fact, it was in this car but I wasn't born yet! I did ride in it quite a few times after I was born as my parents had sold it to my uncle (my cousin's father and another great friend of mine) by the time I was born but he kept it many years and I liked it very much (probably why I owned so many Buicks)! My mother didn't like the vinyl bucket seats that were cold in winter, that's why they got a Grand-Prix with a cloth bench seat just nine months after they purchased the 1976 Century!

 
I guess my wire-grid rear defroster!

The 1st my family had was on our 1986 Chevy Celebrity! We NEVER had to scrape that backlite, only move that bit of frost over the 3rd taillight to that heated area!

Funny how my mom in her later years, despite having cars w/ that feature DID scrape that window even w/ it on! (I tell my wife not to--just help the windows that don't have that advantage!)

And my idiosyncrasy with it, is that I count on it to remove even heavy snow--which unfortunately it's not really designed to do...

-- Dave
 
Depends on how far back you want to go.

There's no question to modern mid-range cars are far more reliable and efficient that cars of yesteryear.

I have several cars, ranging in vintage of 1950, 1964, 1967, 1978, 1997, and 1999. The '99 easily is the most reliable, comfortable, and efficient of the lot. And it would qualify almost as a vintage car now!

Things I like about cars of 90's and later vintage: disc brakes (drum brakes tend to require more maintenance and do not perform as well as discs), four or more speed transmissions (automatic or manual), much improved occupant protection (several of my cars have metal dashes etc. and could be killers in a crash one would walk away from), greater reliability, greater ability to extract more kinetic energy from a gallon of gas, better rust-proofing, better handling, etc. A car from the early 50's might last 70,000 miles before it needs a major overhaul. The parts and alloys and engineering just don't last as long as modern parts.

What I like about older cars: no need to smog them every two years, easier for an owner to work on (no complicated computer controls, emission gadgets, etc), less plastic (in the case of the 50, very little plastic - mainly on emblems, signal light lenses, and some door and control knobs). And yes, they can be real conversation starters.
 
Yes, reliability ...

Cars that start on the first try.

Tires that never get flat!

I love how well-engineered and solid the doors are. Even the better cars back in the '60s and '70s had doors that slammed shut with a tinny clang. Today, even the cheapest cars have doors that shut with a hushed "WHOOP", just like the Mercedes of old.

As much as I hate the needless computerized complexity, I DO love satellite radio, and being able to sync my iPhone with the sound system.

Electric side mirrors. Sounds like a silly extravagance until you use them just once when parallel parking.

Remote control door locks and trunk access. Nothing was more maddening during the winter when your locks iced up and you couldn't get your key in.
 
John, if you're curious to see more GM cars with airbags, have look at this group on Flickr:

 

http://www.flickr.com/groups/1619498@N22/

 



 

Dave,

Electric wire grid defrosters became available in the mid-late 1960s. If I recall correctly, Volkswagens (who had poor heating systems) had them by 1967. It became an option on many american cars in that period.

By the late-seventies, the blower-type was quickly disappearing from the option list of most models and the wire grid even became standard in some cars. As an example, it was standard on all full size Buick models by 1976 (but the blower-type could still be ordered for those who wanted a small credit!). 

 

 

 

The text is in French but look for

"Désembueur de glace arrière (ventilateur)" (blower)

"Désembueur de glace arrière (électrique)" (wire grid)

 "L" is for Optional and "S" is for Standard.



 

 

 
 
Phil . . .

I'm curious, why don't you like rack and pinion steering? Steering precision is one of my pet peeves and I've found it hard to really warm up to a car without rack and pinion steering. It's been around that I know of since before WWII so is hardly new.

 

BTW the Camry during the time yours was built was available with a very good climate control system. My mother insisted on climate control when she bought her 2000 model, and like most of the car it has been trouble free.
 
As someone who drives new cars as part of my job I really appreciate all of the technology and safety features.  One feature/option I don't think has been mentioned is how some vehicles are equipped to adjust their height once they reach a certain speed to improve the aerodynamics and gas mileage.  The Jeep Grand Cherokee's I've driven have this feature, and it really helps improve fuel economy.  Satellite radio, hands free phone, cruise control, better soundproofing, and many other goodies have made driving today a whole lot more pleasurable and safer.
 
Aerodynamics . . .

Although today all manufacturers pay attention to aerodynamics, quite a few have been doing this for decades. Saab, Porsche and Citroen all tested cars in wind tunnels at least as scale models before 1960, building on studies done by various others (Paul Jaray and Wunibald Kamm come to mind). In the case of Citroen although the hydropneumatic suspension didn’t adjust car height as a function of speed it did automatically level both front and rear whenever the engine was running and so assured that the car was level under all conditions, an important concern with aerodynamics. They also used aluminum underpans under the engine compartment to reduce drag, and provided discrete ducting for airflow to both the radiator and front brakes. Photo is of an SM model in the wind tunnel in the late ‘60s, when introduced in 1970 the SM achieved 135 mph with a 170 hp 2.7 liter V-6. That increased to 142 mph with the introduction of fuel injection in late ‘72 which allowed an extra 10 hp for 180 hp. The SM is a rather large and plush car and could not have achieved this without excellent aerodynamics.

Without question the fastest SM ever is the Bonneville car owned by Jerry and Sylvia Hathaway here in LA. During the ‘80s Sylvia achieved 206 mph in that car with a heavily turbocharged 3 liter engine. Much work was required on the engine but the body shape is virtually stock and had no stability problems. For convenience with the turbos Jerry replaced the stock triple Weber DCNFs with a Holly 650 carburetor, he told me that he tried a Holley 750 but it was too large even at those speeds due to the overall efficiency of the shape.

hydralique++3-6-2014-10-50-25.jpg
 
I have some mixed feeling on the reliability issue. Yes older cars did require more frequent maintenance but how many times did you hear "the engine still ran but the body fell apart" On newer cars it seems like a hit or miss. Some are really good and others not so good.

The biggest problem i have with most newer cars is the size. Being a tall male limits how many vehicles i can fit in comfortably. It seems like Crew cab trucks have replaced older large Buicks, Olds, Caddys....etc

In any case, i like most of the features mentioned by others but have been really spoiled by Automatic climate control, power running boards, and when i put the key in the ignition it remembers all of my settings, seat adjustment and so forth. Oh and lets not forget the automatic wipers. I also believe safety has come a long way.

Does anyone remember the heated windshield from the late 80's and early 90's?
 
Back
Top