danemodsandy
Well-known member
Lawrence:
Oneida did that a lot anyway; their approach to flatware was "modular," meaning that one basic shape could get different pattern strikes or have the handle bent a little differently to make a "new" pattern.
There is a difference between Patrick Henry and Paul Revere that a lot of people don't pick up on. Patrick Henry is a stamped pattern, made from heavy sheets of stainless, and Paul Revere is a fully-forged pattern, shaped from bars of stainless. Oneida did that only for its TOL Community Stainless patterns. Also, while both patterns qualify as an Early American "fiddleback" pattern, Paul Revere has some Modernist influence in the shaping of the fiddleback, to make it compatible with both period and modern dinnerware.
The company also recycled pattern names - Queen Bess was used twice, and Enchantment four or five times.
Oneida did that a lot anyway; their approach to flatware was "modular," meaning that one basic shape could get different pattern strikes or have the handle bent a little differently to make a "new" pattern.
There is a difference between Patrick Henry and Paul Revere that a lot of people don't pick up on. Patrick Henry is a stamped pattern, made from heavy sheets of stainless, and Paul Revere is a fully-forged pattern, shaped from bars of stainless. Oneida did that only for its TOL Community Stainless patterns. Also, while both patterns qualify as an Early American "fiddleback" pattern, Paul Revere has some Modernist influence in the shaping of the fiddleback, to make it compatible with both period and modern dinnerware.
The company also recycled pattern names - Queen Bess was used twice, and Enchantment four or five times.