AM/FM anyone?
A similar shift happened a few years back with radio. FM was invented in 1933, but it did not become widely available until starting in the 1950s. FM did not fully replace AM until the 1980s (popular music). In my area AM is still used for talk, and foreign language programming. I don't know who said it, but someone once phrased the shift as follows:
Most people didn't feel a strong need to change to the superior FM because, at the time, there were millions of AM sets is use by millions of people who were generally satisfied with the situation.
My biggest problem with digital tuners in devices I have owned or played with, thus far, is that they are so slow to tune and it adds yet another remote control to my collection. I think I have enough remotes to build a model of stonehenge! I have a 2005 27" Sony WEGA flat CRT that is just great. The tuner is fast, the picture, while not as sharp as HD, is still quite good, especially to my less-than-perfect eyes. I am satisfied with Analog TV, and I watch very little of it, on only a few channels I like. Why am I being forced to change? I could understand killing analog TV if it was a bandwidth that had already been abandond by most of the population, much like analog cellular telephone technology (except in the case of my 2002 Saab's Onstar system, but that is another story from GM Hell). Basically, I'm pissed because a format that is in use by so many people is being taken away and it is going to cost me money, time, and inconvenience.
Although analog signals will no longer be broadcast over the air, what about the cable companies? Can I still watch my analog TV without a tuner box? It has been my experience that both Cox, and especially Comcast, will do their best to screw the average consumer out of as much money as possibe for the worst service possible, with the worst customer service imaginable. A 75-year-old woman here in Manassas recently attacked the local Comcast office with a hammer, and smashed up some office equipment and scared the clearks. I know how she feels, she reached that point out of sheer frustration at Comcast's treatment of her. Basicaly, I wouldn't trust the cable companies with my garbage, much less my in-home entertainment, if they are my last source for analog TV, what am I to do?
I would love to see a digital tuner box that would take the incoming signals, allow the user to choose which channels they wanted to watch, and then "broadcast" all of them, at the same time, out of a coaxial jack in the analog signals so that the TV connected via a coaxial cable would be able to use its analog tuner as if it were prior to Feb. 2009.
I'm sorry about my little rant, but I am just upset because I am perfectly satisfied with my TV just the way it is and I don't want to change, and I think that a significant percentage of the population is in a similar situation. I'm really not this worked-up all the time. I promise I'm really a nice person, just don't fix what ain't broke!
Sigh, I feel better now,
Dave
A similar shift happened a few years back with radio. FM was invented in 1933, but it did not become widely available until starting in the 1950s. FM did not fully replace AM until the 1980s (popular music). In my area AM is still used for talk, and foreign language programming. I don't know who said it, but someone once phrased the shift as follows:
Most people didn't feel a strong need to change to the superior FM because, at the time, there were millions of AM sets is use by millions of people who were generally satisfied with the situation.
My biggest problem with digital tuners in devices I have owned or played with, thus far, is that they are so slow to tune and it adds yet another remote control to my collection. I think I have enough remotes to build a model of stonehenge! I have a 2005 27" Sony WEGA flat CRT that is just great. The tuner is fast, the picture, while not as sharp as HD, is still quite good, especially to my less-than-perfect eyes. I am satisfied with Analog TV, and I watch very little of it, on only a few channels I like. Why am I being forced to change? I could understand killing analog TV if it was a bandwidth that had already been abandond by most of the population, much like analog cellular telephone technology (except in the case of my 2002 Saab's Onstar system, but that is another story from GM Hell). Basically, I'm pissed because a format that is in use by so many people is being taken away and it is going to cost me money, time, and inconvenience.
Although analog signals will no longer be broadcast over the air, what about the cable companies? Can I still watch my analog TV without a tuner box? It has been my experience that both Cox, and especially Comcast, will do their best to screw the average consumer out of as much money as possibe for the worst service possible, with the worst customer service imaginable. A 75-year-old woman here in Manassas recently attacked the local Comcast office with a hammer, and smashed up some office equipment and scared the clearks. I know how she feels, she reached that point out of sheer frustration at Comcast's treatment of her. Basicaly, I wouldn't trust the cable companies with my garbage, much less my in-home entertainment, if they are my last source for analog TV, what am I to do?
I would love to see a digital tuner box that would take the incoming signals, allow the user to choose which channels they wanted to watch, and then "broadcast" all of them, at the same time, out of a coaxial jack in the analog signals so that the TV connected via a coaxial cable would be able to use its analog tuner as if it were prior to Feb. 2009.
I'm sorry about my little rant, but I am just upset because I am perfectly satisfied with my TV just the way it is and I don't want to change, and I think that a significant percentage of the population is in a similar situation. I'm really not this worked-up all the time. I promise I'm really a nice person, just don't fix what ain't broke!
Sigh, I feel better now,
Dave