Nice '59, and with only 56K on it, can you advise how you got it and why the low miles?
Our fellow member 58Limited advised that there were some mechanical issues with the '58 model year. I prefer the styling on the front of the '59 and '60 models over the '58. Lincolns and Continentals made during this 3-year run are considered ugly ducklings and the Continental Marks from this period often aren't even included in the historical accounts of the Mark I, II, and III.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and the feeling that this series of Lincoln & Continental are among the least desirable can only help those of us who are interested in them to be able to afford one.
Ralph
Our fellow member 58Limited advised that there were some mechanical issues with the '58 model year. I prefer the styling on the front of the '59 and '60 models over the '58. Lincolns and Continentals made during this 3-year run are considered ugly ducklings and the Continental Marks from this period often aren't even included in the historical accounts of the Mark I, II, and III.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and the feeling that this series of Lincoln & Continental are among the least desirable can only help those of us who are interested in them to be able to afford one.
Ralph