reactor
Well-known member
This GE dishwasher was sitting in the garage for several years. After I moved, I decided to use it to replace the newer Electrolux/Frigidaire installed in the house. The Frigidaire was just too slow. Drove me crazy waiting over two and a half hours to do a load of dishes.
I replace the new GE looped racks with the older conventional rack. Their newer upper rack is an extremely poor design, in my opinion. Saucers lay almost flat. Near impossible to get deep bowls into the loops and even regular bowls flop over. No room for tall glasses or pots in the upper rack, either. The looped upper rack is the worst rack I have used in any dishwasher, ever.
The results you see in the pictures, using the dishwasher in the Potscrubber Cycle, were pretty good, but not quite perfect. Sadly, I found two little flakes, when I unloaded the dishes, that I had to flick off with my finger.
By the time GE made this model, they had reduced the fill times to cut down on water usage.
The Potscrubber cycle uses 8.8 gallons. Doesn't work quite as well as the older vintage GE's that I have had which used about 10 to 12 gallons.
In order to get the full seven water changes, this dishwasher has to be run in the "Potscrubber" cycle. The "Normal" cycle only uses 4.0 gallons of water, in order to meet the Government's Energy Star requirements. The results show the lack of water usage and water changes...terrible.
In the Potscrubber mode, it's good, but not quite perfect, but still quite acceptable. The spray is more powerful than the Frigidaire's which just lightly tinkled on the dishes for three hours.
(BTW, I don't have a water softener in this house, yet, so the dishes don't quite gleam as much due to the moderately hard water.)









I replace the new GE looped racks with the older conventional rack. Their newer upper rack is an extremely poor design, in my opinion. Saucers lay almost flat. Near impossible to get deep bowls into the loops and even regular bowls flop over. No room for tall glasses or pots in the upper rack, either. The looped upper rack is the worst rack I have used in any dishwasher, ever.
The results you see in the pictures, using the dishwasher in the Potscrubber Cycle, were pretty good, but not quite perfect. Sadly, I found two little flakes, when I unloaded the dishes, that I had to flick off with my finger.
By the time GE made this model, they had reduced the fill times to cut down on water usage.
The Potscrubber cycle uses 8.8 gallons. Doesn't work quite as well as the older vintage GE's that I have had which used about 10 to 12 gallons.
In order to get the full seven water changes, this dishwasher has to be run in the "Potscrubber" cycle. The "Normal" cycle only uses 4.0 gallons of water, in order to meet the Government's Energy Star requirements. The results show the lack of water usage and water changes...terrible.
In the Potscrubber mode, it's good, but not quite perfect, but still quite acceptable. The spray is more powerful than the Frigidaire's which just lightly tinkled on the dishes for three hours.
(BTW, I don't have a water softener in this house, yet, so the dishes don't quite gleam as much due to the moderately hard water.)








