Bose buys McIntosh (audio equipment)

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

cfz2882

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
2,620
Location
Belle Fourche,SD
I thought bose had degraded to a "BPC" brand some time ago... but this notion could be wrong? Last i knew, McIntosh was still at least assembled in USA and premium stuff worthy of analog source.I almost bought a McIntosh receiver about 1992 at a stereo store table sale: noticed the transformer was decent size and TO-3 transistors at back had 1973 date codes. They wanted $ 300 for it.
 
I've serviced some McIntosh stuff for customers years ago, and a few amps for a neighbor.
While they were built like heavy bricks, and sported snazzy styling, I wasn't too impressed with them.
Yes, they performed nicely, but their specs were somewhat dissapointing.
In comparison, the THD specs on the older amps was rated at 0.25%, while my much less expensive Technics receiver is rated at 0.008% - way lower.
Of course, the average ear can't really tell the difference with music, but my calibrated laboratory distortion tester could.

In my opinion, the name McIntosh, and even the Marantz, are highly sought after only because they were expensive and snazzy.
Just like an automobile - it's all in the name -hype.
 
The Bose i am most familiar with besides the 901,is the Delco-Bose stereos in certain GM cars starting in 1983: special low level output head unit outputting to amplified speaker modules-the amp in these modules especially prone to bad capacitors, probably too much heat buildup in that plastic module. I used to use the head units with regular aftermarket amps and speakers.
 
Both are largely just marketing companies today where the name is worth more than anything else. Really seems like these companies were made for one another.

McIntosh jumped the price/performance value shark decades ago and they rely on their name and big blue meters to fleece HiFi buyers out of their money. It isn’t difficult to find equipment that performs on a par for about 1/2 the big cost.
 
Yes, they performed nicely, but their specs were somewhat dissapointing.
In comparison, the THD specs on the older amps was rated at 0.25%, while my much less expensive Technics receiver is rated at 0.008% - way lower.
Of course, the average ear can't really tell the difference with music, but my calibrated laboratory distortion tester could.
It is easy to reduce harmonic distortion: you just have to add lots of negative feedback, which is exactly what the Japanese manufacturers used to do when audio equipment was assessed based on their specifications, and when some manufacturers were trying to use the specifications as a selling point.

But then it was found that negative feedback is not very good for the listening experience, hence it is possible, actually very likely, that McIntosh decided not to exceed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top