Hi Folks
Wanted to start a thread to get some opinions on this topic. There have been a few threads in the past where the topic was brought up. From what I've read, the appliance manufacturers employed one of two methods for oven baking. Either they used the bottom element with secondary reduced heat from the top element or the bottom element only. These days however, I think almost all use both elements.
I have two stoves in my home, a wonderful 2015 GE Profile induction range and a beautiful Canadian made 1959 Moffat electric range.
Standard bake in the GE involves both the bake (bottom) and broil (top) elements with the bake being the primary heat source and the broil running either at reduced wattage or in short intervals (not too sure but it doesn't get red). The GE has a hidden bake element.
The Moffat preheats using both the bake and broil elements on full blast but once it gets close to temperature the broil kicks out and the bake element is what maintains the heat in the oven. The broil element is open coil and the bake element is the standard calrod style.
Most opinions I've read indicate that ranges with bottom heat only produce poor results for baking but I'm not experiencing that with this oven. I find that there is actually an advantage to using bottom heat only with certain recipes. For instance, I bake bread and buns regularly and although I get beautiful results in both ovens, I find the Moffat produces a slightly better product. I don't get an issue with uneven browning on the top vs the bottom. I also find that I don't need to worry so much about pies over browning on the top and pizza comes out a bit better without the top heat as well.
Cookies and biscuits tend to bake a bit better in the GE in bake mode however if I'm trying to bake multiple racks at once I use convection. Cakes are a bit of a toss up, I seem to get good results in either. Roasting meat is definitely faster in the GE but I do get excellent results in the Moffat as well. Both ovens have a probe and I always use that for meat as they are both spot on.
I've measured temps in both ovens and although I initially had to calibrate the Moffat a bit when I started using it, both are very accurate. I'm a pretty experienced baker but I'm just not observing the poor results that I've read about with bottom heat only ovens. I'd argue that it is actually in advantage depending on what you are baking.
Anyone else have any observations?
www.automaticwasher.org
Wanted to start a thread to get some opinions on this topic. There have been a few threads in the past where the topic was brought up. From what I've read, the appliance manufacturers employed one of two methods for oven baking. Either they used the bottom element with secondary reduced heat from the top element or the bottom element only. These days however, I think almost all use both elements.
I have two stoves in my home, a wonderful 2015 GE Profile induction range and a beautiful Canadian made 1959 Moffat electric range.
Standard bake in the GE involves both the bake (bottom) and broil (top) elements with the bake being the primary heat source and the broil running either at reduced wattage or in short intervals (not too sure but it doesn't get red). The GE has a hidden bake element.
The Moffat preheats using both the bake and broil elements on full blast but once it gets close to temperature the broil kicks out and the bake element is what maintains the heat in the oven. The broil element is open coil and the bake element is the standard calrod style.
Most opinions I've read indicate that ranges with bottom heat only produce poor results for baking but I'm not experiencing that with this oven. I find that there is actually an advantage to using bottom heat only with certain recipes. For instance, I bake bread and buns regularly and although I get beautiful results in both ovens, I find the Moffat produces a slightly better product. I don't get an issue with uneven browning on the top vs the bottom. I also find that I don't need to worry so much about pies over browning on the top and pizza comes out a bit better without the top heat as well.
Cookies and biscuits tend to bake a bit better in the GE in bake mode however if I'm trying to bake multiple racks at once I use convection. Cakes are a bit of a toss up, I seem to get good results in either. Roasting meat is definitely faster in the GE but I do get excellent results in the Moffat as well. Both ovens have a probe and I always use that for meat as they are both spot on.
I've measured temps in both ovens and although I initially had to calibrate the Moffat a bit when I started using it, both are very accurate. I'm a pretty experienced baker but I'm just not observing the poor results that I've read about with bottom heat only ovens. I'd argue that it is actually in advantage depending on what you are baking.
Anyone else have any observations?

Moffat Range
So I found this stove a few months back and decided to give it a home. Moffat was a Canadian company most well known for its ranges. From what I understand, Moffat was acquired by GSW in 1971 and GSW merged with Canadian General Electric in 1977 to form Camco. Anyway, before I picked it up I...
