breaking news in appliance magazine today....

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

richm

New member
Joined
Jun 29, 2023
Messages
0
Location
Pompano Beach, FL
Maytag Stockholders Approve Whirlpool Merger
Dec 22, 2005

Appliance maker Maytag Corporation announced that Maytag stockholders approved the proposed merger with fellow appliance maker Whirlpool Corporation.

Based on the preliminary vote total announced at the meeting, the merger was approved by 68.5 percent of the shares outstanding and 97.8 percent of those shares voting. The proposal only required an approval of more than 50 percent of the shares outstanding.

Under the merger, Maytag stockholders will be entitled to receive for each share of Maytag common stock, approximately U.S. $21 in value, comprised of $10.50 in cash and between 0.1144 and 0.1398 of a share of Whirlpool common stock, depending on the volume weighted average trading prices of Whirlpool common stock during a 20-day trading period ending shortly prior to completion of the merger.

"We are very pleased that Maytag's shareholders have fully endorsed the merger," said Jeff M. Fettig, Whirlpool's chairman and CEO. "The combination of Whirlpool and Maytag will create very substantial benefits for consumers, trade customers and our shareholders. We believe this transaction will result in better products, quality and service, as well as efficiencies, which will enhance our ability to succeed in the increasingly competitive global home-appliance industry."

The final vote total will be posted on Maytag's website, www.maytagcorp.com after the inspector certifies the vote totals.

The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is reviewing the proposed merger. In order to facilitate the review, Whirlpool and Maytag have agreed not to close the proposed merger before Feb. 27, 2006, without the Antitrust Division's concurrence, although the Antitrust Division may request additional time for review. Whirlpool and Maytag continue to expect the transaction to close as early as the first quarter of 2006.
 
Interesting...never thought the Maytags would end up joining the DD bandwagon! At least they'll have a REAL Dual-Action agitator in them instead of that cheap LoadSensor...
 
Yes,I am afraid Maytag is gone as we knew them.Those Maytag washers in Applianceville collections will become more valueable.I remember a washer display at Wards years ago-they demoed the Maytag by running it with ping-pong balls in it-This machine had the "Loadsenser" agitator-then put light bulbs in it and it circulated the bulbs without breaking them.This was a "glass front" demo machine.Wonder if the WP DA agitor would break the bulbs--but the real question--how well did the Maytag DA agitator do with CLOTHES?Most folks buy the washer to clean clothes with--not light bulbs.Also wonder if the agitation of the bulbs broke their filaments?
 
I wonder what the merger means to the Maytag line up...the top loaders, atlantis are already discontinued as well as front load neptunes. Wonder what will happen with maysungs made by samsung. Time will tell.
 
westyslantfront, Maytag still produces 2 models of Atlanti, and they still produce the 5500-series Neptune FL's in Newton. They discontinued the Neptune TL & the SAV models.
 
light bulbs

45 years ago Frigidaire had a TV ad campaign to show how gentle their Three Ring Pump Agitators were. First, they dropped a bar of Ivory Soap in a WP tub with the straight vane agitator and the water level at low. When they took it out, the poor bar of soap looked like something had been trying to eat it. Then they dropped a fresh bar of Ivory in the Frigidaire with a full tub of water and let it circulate for the same time as in the WP, then took it out and the bar was hardly nicked. Now, they could have used hot water in the WP tub and the could have used cold in the Frigidaire tub, but it made a very convincing demonstration. Since Ivory floated, they showed it being pulled under and coming up, over and over in the Frigidaire. The WP wash action just looked like a lot of thrashing around.
 
The difference being clothes are flexible and not solid objects.

The WP also was not filled to the top above the vanes.
Of course any oscillating agitator would have nicked the soap bar up with a partial fill and exposed vanes.

I'll catch hell for this i know, though i do like older Frigidaire washers, i just think that they are a little overrated.

LONG LIVE OSCILLATING AGITATORS!!! :-)
 
Yes-when it was brought up-vaguely remember that commercial on the Fridgedaire washer and its "jumping Jack" agitator and the soap block.The block from the Fridge' wasn't damaged-but the one from the regular agitator was chewed up.I feel the test would have been more fair if the WP washer was filled all the way.Then the soap bar wouldn't have been cut as much by the agitator vanes.I too prefer the regular agitator.I have used the oscillating agitator machines-they work pretty well-I just had to learn the "knack" for loading it so clothes wouldn't tangle.My bother's trailer home had one-also replaced the timer in it.Was Coppertone in color and in the bathroom.Loved the way that trailer shook when the washer was agitating or spinning.Another friend of mine had a Fridigedaire washer and was pleased with it.-It too was in a trailer.
Oh-does anyone have a copy of that ad so it can be recorded into the "videos" section of Applianceville?I still hunt the old ad DVD and videos for it.Vaguely remember it when I was very little-and saw it on the old "Hoffman" TV.That set was for us kids-put in the basement-and the folks got to watch a new Zenith.The Hoffman had a "green" screen phospor-sort of like an oscilloscope or a "green" screen computer monitor.Wonder it didn't hurt ouir eyes.the monochrome Zenith was better-watched when I could!
 
Hi agiflow....long live top loaders and agitators!!!.....was recently in best buy and was told that by 2007, they will NOT carry any top loaders...i am tired of washers being ruled by eco-fascists!!!....i do not believe clothes can come clean unless there is water for the dirt to go to....
the modern front loaders do not take in enough water in my opinion...and that is what makes top loaders better....
 
LONG LIVE OSCILLATING AGITATORS!!! :-)

1) Light bulbs in washer tubs?
Why do these things always end up in the wrong places?

2) Buy a new T/L-er in mid or end 2006. The prices will come WAY down since they can't be sold here in 2007.

3) Pat and Ross, you realize, of course, that as much as I agree with you both, SOMEONE is gonna open a can of WHOOP-@SS on you both. :-)
 
I say "LONG LIVE OSCILLATING AGITATORS!" as well. Of course that's because up-and-down Frigidaires are no longer being produced...LOL. :)

All kidding aside, the US water and energy use "requirements" for washers become much stricter every single year (thanks to "eco-fascism" as Ross mentioned), I do believe in an effort to "choke" conventional agitator top-loaders out of the market. The decision about water usage should NOT lie in the government, IMHO. Water is a theoretically "renewable" resource; we shouldn't have to try to "control" it. I wonder what will happen 10 years from now and how scarce top-loaders will be then...

LONG LIVE WATER HOGS!!
 
Mixed feelings...

I feel a little sad that the old Maytag will be gone, but only a little as its that old Maytag that killed another old brand namely HOOVER. For whatever reason, Maytag seemed to take all their woes out on the Hoover Company the last few years, selling land, laying people off, shutting down Hoover's IP plant and almost killing the main one, located smack in the middle of town.
Yes we can mourn the loss of once mighty Maytag, but maye also look for new beginnings and brighter futures.
 
Hi Hoover. Maytag took over too many companies, I guess to knock out competition. Where were regulatory agencies then to prevent that? And I feel that Maytag bit off more than they could chew.

Austin....one eco-fascist in my parish told me that I am polluting the eco system using mexican detergents with phosphates but I told her that my only concern is that my whites are white and my brights are bright. Besides, the Rector says that whatever I do in my laundry room, where I reign supreme is ok by him and to keep up the good work.

Tolivac. I am with you about scrapping stupid conservation laws. I lived in Palm Springs, California for 7 years where, instead of desert vegitation, it was all northern and eastern style with lawns. So much water from automatic irrigation systems ended up flowing down the street.
 
westyslantfront:Thats the issues there really-its not washers and dishwashers that use up water-its EXTERNAL use of water--such as watering lawns,filling swimming pools and car washing that "wastes" water.I want the Republicans-or whatever to scrap the "Energy-Star" regs.We don't need them.Consumers can pick the appliances that best suit their needs-NOT GOV'T.also the watering of the lawns causes pollution-from the feritlizers and pesticides applied to the lawns-when you water the lawn--those fertilizers and pesticides leach out and pollute the ecosystem!I don't put fertilzers on my lawn or water it-the grass and plants do just fine!!I also mulch the grass clippings and other lwan debris so I don't have to put it in the dump--best to leave it on the lawn.My mower chops and shreds it up so it decomposes.The "Wizard"-"Gator" blades are great.You can get them at Home Depot-they are made to fit various mowers.I suppose folks who like TL machines--are going to have to "stock Up"get them while you can.I just wish I had a basement here to put them in!!
 
Well, while it's true that lawns and swimming pools can waste water... there is more to the laundry issue than just water consumption. Water put on a lawn goes to the ground (unless it's way excessive and causes runoff, of course). Water from a washer goes to the sewer or septic system. If it's to the septic system, it can contribute to an overload there. If it's to the sewer system, then the municipality must devote resources to process that water. So the water applied to a lawn and the water used in a washer have very different final destinations.

Additionally, irrigation water need not be of the same quality as tap water. I use a well to water my lawn. The well water is not drinkable - too much nitrates and other stuff - but it's just fine for the lawn and garden.

In any case, since you live in Arizona, you might tell your busybody eco friend at church that in arid states of the American southwest, phosphates are not considered to be a pollution problem. Rather, nitrates are the prime problem. If he or she really wants to stop contributing to nitrate overload in the ecosystem... he or she can dig a latrine and use that instead of flushing it down the sewer...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top