Coming Eventually, the New and "Improved" Super Forum

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Of course right now I have GE leaking oil all over the basement floor, the '56 Hotpoint timer is suddenly acting up, as of this week the timer in the KitchenAid dishwasher is only incrementing once every three increments and the WO-65 water valve started leaking last weekend. Everything at once, ugh!

Hey Robert, I think my partner can match that. The power has been off at our house due to storms for the last 3 day, today my partner went off to work, and ran into six road closures and detours on the way. An hour later he collapsed in sudden and overwhelming pain on his left side, 911 was called, he was rushed to the hospital. He had passed (we hope) a kidney stone. And when we finally got home tonight?

A jury duty summons for him in our mailbox.

Right now we don't know whether to laugh or cry, this day has been incredible.
 
I'd like to start by talking a bit about what I think this site means to people, and why it's so successful.

I've been reading this bunch of people since early when the site was at the Yahoo! groups, and at that point I went back and read all the posts, which took me a few days. We've moved then to ClassicAppliances.com and later the name got changed to AutomaticWasher.org.

I could tell you many many stories about what we went thru. I am willing to bet that y'all could also tell me many more that I've missed during the periods when I had no time at all to read this site. I always come back though, it's basically the very first site I read when I have time, then if I have more time I read the others, which is rare these days.

Anyway, we went through many things together. People lying and trying to scam nice people here, outrageous claims flying, you think about something, it probably happened to some of us here too.

That, to me, is the entire difference between this website and the others: we bonded. We come here and have friends, not just people across the intartubes which you can flame and tease and be nasty to.

You want a story? "When I was a little kid, in Saint Olaf, MN..." (or, if you don't like that, "Picture, Sicily, 1934...") Anyway, a couple of years ago, a regular poster here posted a link to a TED Talk with Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor (who suffered a massive stroke, survived it and recovered to a degree that many would say "complete"). I credit AW.org, the poster and Dr. Taylor with the fact that my SO is alive and well today -- a few months (maybe less than a couple of months, in fact) after that post, my SO suffered a stroke and because of AW.org and Dr. Taylor, I was able to not only recognize what was going on at the very first few minutes, but also to know that I had to call 911. It also gave us strength and courage to go through a hard recovery. Today, he's recovered completely and no one can even tell he ever had any trouble and even friends who know him for years sometimes say it seems like it was just a bad dream. That post was definitely not "on topic" and I would have never seen it otherwise, it's that simple.

That to me, in a very small nutshell, is AW.org. We're not just talking about on-topic stuff, we make friends, we talk about a variety of things. Incredibly, that is also what helps people who collect the incredibly rare appliances -- you can bet your hard earned money that if it wasn't for this sense of camaraderie and community here, you wouldn't see anyone taking any of their valuable time to help each other and even send incredibly rare parts or entire machines as gifts to each other.

I feel that one can only have that sense of community when people behave like people, instead of being forced into a sanitized state. It doesn't take long to find out who are the people who spin the most incredible stories and lie through their teeth the way the site operates now.

Let me try and address some of the things that seem to be worrying people, please bear with me.

The other day I was reading a user guide for a dishwasher from another country. It had lots of verbiage about how dangerous automatic dishwashing detergents are for kids and how you need to lock the controls and the door so kids will not "accidentally" ingest it. Let me just say that I think the word "accidentally" is very ill chosen -- it's not that you suddenly turned your back for half a second and your kid ended up in the Emergency Room. It's that you're not paying enough attention to your kids and you're not teaching them what they need to learn to succeed in life.

I have a dog -- the first three times I was loading the dishwasher when she was a puppy, she got near the machine and tried to sniff/lick stuff, I gently blocked her and told her "no". Previously, when we lived in large homes with lots of students, one of our housemates had a cat, we trained him the same way, no problem ever. You don't need to spank your kids or pets so they'll learn, you can be gentle. They'll learn what you consider acceptable very quickly if you treat them as intelligent beings. I can't believe that people need to lock the dishwasher to avoid landing their way more intelligent human kids in the ER. I have never had any troubles with pets and/or children jumping into the washer or dryer, and I don't personally know anyone with that problem with babies/children either. They teach their kids and then it's no problem if a washer or dryer is open.

So, I think that if anyone has a problem with their kids reading this website, it's their problem to deal with, they need to teach their kids and pay attention to what they are doing. They can also buy and use software to limit what their kids are looking at on the internet. Maybe all we need to do is mark the Super Forum as Adult oriented and let their software block it if they care.

Also, please think very seriously when was the first time you were introduced to swear words and subjects such as sex. I am willing to bet that for the majority here, you heard and repeated your first swear words when you were under 7 and sex must have registered on your radar screen before you were 10.

I don't feel like we are supposed to be baby sitting kids on the internet on the off-chance someone has not heard a swear word or about sex until they are 21 or so. That's their parents' job.

Do I come here to listen to the sex talk or talk about it? No. But I don't flinch and ran away either. Do I need to see posts peppered with sex and swear words? Hell, no. But again, I'm a grown up, I can deal with it and be polite about it if it's too much. I don't need a flame war about this, and they seem to be fairly regular in websites that have "strict rules" about subjects and language.

As a matter of fact, websites with "strict rules" seem to spend way more time flaming about people who supposedly broke the rules than on-topic subjects.

Remember also, that this is the internet. No one owes you anything. Don't expect to come here and find everything the way you like it so you can relax and get away from the world. Go do something that guarantees you that if you must, but don't come here talking about "think of the children" any time something gets out of whack. If you are too easily shocked, you should get out more, or at least stay away from the internet, where people from all over the world, with every race, religion and political view can participate.

Also, don't come to us pleading the case of etiquette: if you have actually bothered to read Ms. Manners for even 5 minutes, I find it terribly hard to believe that she has not gotten thru to you that "Etiquette is not about never being offended or offending anyone -- quite the contrary, etiquette is all about deeply offending someone in front of everyone but in a polite way which may include plausible deniability."

You don't want to talk about sex, then don't. Be the change you want to see in the world, like Ghandi said. Behave like an adult, if the thread has a subject that you know you don't like, don't read it. Say you don't like toploaders or frontloaders -- avoid the thread, there's absolutely no real good reason to come to the thread to bitch about and repeat for the billionth time that you think they're are worthless and the tool and work of the devil. Really. Trust me on that one, we've heard it before, probably from you. We're not dumb, we understood you the very first freaking time.

Also, I find the argument that such and such magazine/newspaper/whatever can't publish about our website because we're too racy/foulmouth etc to be disingenuous at best. One can find such things all over the internets without even trying, kids can find more stuff on Youtube than here, no one seems to be too worried about Youtube. Sometime ago, for example, someone said something racy and a few people who I will charitably think were well intentioned but naive instead of sophisticated, pointed out that such subjects were for websites A, B and C. Well, no one has ever accused me of being a prude or misinformed about sex, but wouldn't you know it, the people who were so worried about the kids taught me about 3 websites I had never heard of before and that were too racy for this vanilla guy. Talk about making it easy for kids to find info which was worse than what was posted here. The fact that some publication has to pretend to be shy or naive and not publish about us may explain why they are loosing readership when it's now so easy to find out what one wants on the intartubes by oneself -- previously, I fear that the reason they wouldn't publish such things is that one side of their publishing house could pretend to be so virtuous when the other branches of their business were busy publishing books and magazines like Cosmo, teaching you all about how to be thin and beautiful and how to learn these 2 dozen new sex positions and what the other people like in bed. Riiiiiight. Very virtuous, as if I couldn't read the name of the publishers on the covers.

It also bothers me how everything needs to be so clean and disinfected, so very Pleasantville, with Main St and Lovers Lane, where everyone is white, middle class, straight with 2.5 kids, a dog and a cat. No one has a bathroom and, if they do, their's no toilet in it. Two single beds on the couple's bedroom, yeah, right.

It's like telling us that we need to be nice so the straight people will show up and stay. Well, if straight people show up and are so ill adjusted that they can't deal with some gayness, do we really want them here? It's like telling us that they accept that we're black but they'll only interact with us if we use enough makeup to appear to be white. We have plenty of nice straight people here that seem to have no problems with the site. The ones that would have a problem with some gayness, well, we're here, we're queer, get used to it. They can't be serious collectors or seriously interested in appliances if they let something like gender, sexual orientation, nationality, rare, religion or politics get in their way.

What would I like to see less of in the site? Ebay/Craigslist crap -- I seriously can't believe anyone who is searching for something has not been looking there already. If you know who specifically has been looking for something, email them, but the constant "heads up!" is silly beyond words. I like it when people post stuff to snark about how someone is posting about a GE dishwasher and it's actually a Whirlpool self-cleaning oven, it's not that I don't have a sense of humor. But really, do you honestly think that you'll be the only one that saw that special dryer near Anytown, USA?

I would like to see less stupidity -- I lost count of the times here that someone that is saying something that makes sense and I agree wholehearted with says it in such a way that even I get repulsed by the tone and words. People, get a clue, if you sound like an idiot, you are actually advertising for the opposition instead of your camp. In fact, I sometimes think some of the folks here *do* work for the opposition and want us to feel so bad about gay rights and/or political platforms that we'll switch sides.

As for the kids -- I don't mind them being here, it's fun to see them grow up and contribute. But their parents are supposed to supervise them, not me. They are welcome here, but parents, take note, one of the few things that Americans and America gets wrong, or fails to get at all, is that parents should not be raising kids, parents should be raising adults -- if you are not educating your kids, supervising them, guiding them to become reasonably well adjusted in society and contributing members to society, you are failing at your job. It's your job to make sure that your kids are learning about safe sex either from you, in the safety of your home, or from some reputable instructors in some good school. Not from misinformed "friends" on the street.

To the folks that are so bent out of shape about paying for the site. I don't care where you live, if you have a credit card, you don't even need to sign up to PayPal, you can have PayPal transfer your 12 bucks per year to this site. If you can't afford a buck a month, please let us know -- I would be more than glad to drop a chunk of change here to be offered as some form of scholarship to the folks who are struggling with this. No, I'm not rich, but my folks give me a chunk of money every year for my birthday and I'd more than gladly give the money to Robert and consider this community my birthday gift.

Robert, if you want the least programing load on your back, just list either the super forum or the entire site as "Possible Adult Subjects" and let the parents decide. I'm willing to bet that any parent that is cool with the kids' interest will already be cool enough to not care about the label. All the other parents are probably already forbidding time by the computer anyway, not worth worrying about it.

And finally, thank you Robert and all here for everything. This place makes my day better even when heavy stuff goes on here, it feels to me that I'm among friends/family.

Peace all,
-- Paulo.

PS: just occurred to me that I forgot to touch another important point. History shows that on the Internet (at least since Usenet newsgroups, and certainly the websites), every time someone says "this subject is not on-topic for this forum, we should create another one for it", it will be lather/rinse/repeat. Say you have a forum for classic appliances and people start discussing the newest thing some company released last week. Eventually enough people decide it's annoying and we create a forum for modern stuff. Then enough people start asking about detergents etc or what they found out last week and we have a forum for chit-chat. Then the subjects turn to the last cancer treatment, or someone's pet or lover is sick or dead, then people start talking about religion, politics and sex and we create another forum for hot topics. Sooner or later, the hot topics forum will start complaining about the BDSM vs. vanilla sex or swear words etc. That's why we have 3 forums now. We'll need 6 soon and it won't stop there. Maybe we should tell everyone to get a free newsreader (if I remember correctly Outlook Express has a built-in one and there are plenty of better newsreaders out there for free) and let this be Robert's website and use alt.automaticwasher.vintage, alt.automaticwasher.modern, alt.automaticwasher.chitchat, alt.automaticwasher.hottopics etc and let people use the built-in kill-files and threading to deal with it on their own, instead of forcing Robert to accommodate everyone. I warn all that have never been to a Usenet newsgroup though, we'll be seeing a lot of spam and people driving by to let us know we're perverts for liking appliances, which is one of the reasons this site was created, I think. ;-)
 
"I notice by your profile, that you don't even own

Believe it or not, there seem to be many great contributors to this site who don't presently own vintage washers or other appliances. I have a great love of all the vintage machines, and own several vintage small appliances, that's as close as I can get at the moment. My non vintage units will be replaced with something more to my liking when they die or become irreparable. And, there are some antique car sites that state "you don't need to own a _______ to become a member of the group". I'm guessing that the majority of non-vintage owners are here for love of these great old machines, and other vintage delights. If you ask or tell me to not bring up unsavory way off topic subjects, I have no problem with it. Undeniably, there are people with little or no interest in the real reason for this site who love to stir the pot. I won't be one of them.

One site I'm a member of had one man say "this is a site for tube amplifiers only", and was quickly corrected by another man who said, "read the description, this site is for all of the products made before the new companies removal of the original designs by the parent company" or something along that line. If Robert would prefer vintage washers etc. owners only, I'm sure he would inform us. It has always amused me when someone tells you with authority what so and so's group is, don't speak for them unless you know for a fact that it is an owners only site. But, there are owners of stellar collections who have been banned for being infinitely worse mannered than the rabble rousers.

My suggestion is to clearly state in the site description that flaming, or other troublemaking is not tolerated in any form, and truly horrifying subject matter won't be tolerated either. Any gay related subject matter mostly consists of tastefully presented ideas and arguements. No one seems to really have a problem with that, just the incredible hatred and cruelty that seems to erupt all too frequently.
 
Paulo, that's an amazing story about your SO. I don't remember if I was the one who posted the Taylor link to AW, but I do remember forwarding it to other forums and friends.

I agree with almost all of what you said, except for part about posting Craigslist "heads-ups". As far as I know there's no way to do a global search on CL, and searching the ads for every city for interesting appliances would take an hour every day for a fast reader, and maybe twice as much time for a slow reader. Fortunately traffic in the Imperial Forum is slow enough where, at least IMO, the CL postings aren't a problem.
 
112561,

I've been through the same thing as have several other members.

It's just some peoples' way of saying: "You're not one of us, you don't belong".

Which is total nonsense. Robert determines who belongs or not and he has clearly welcomed people here who share his joy and delight in vintage appliances, not necessarily his incredible collection. There are several respected, established members of this site who know my real life name and contact info, several have exchanged vintage parts/manuals and photos with me through the years. In short, the genuineness of my collections has been proved, yet you will find the same charge leveled against me right here in this thread.
Best to ignore it, the rest of us are really happy you're here.

Paulo,
I wish I could write as well as you do. I agree with you, completely.
 
Paulo, well put and also with minor exceptions I do agree with you but the thing is as I see it, and I personally do like the political and or racy stuff, is those zealots, scratched record people,"right fighters" call em what you will, who never ever seem to know when it's time to STFU as we were just given an example of the other day.
 
Panthera, Paolo, Petek

Right on!! I don't doubt for a minute most of the people here and on this thread are big time appliance lovers. There are instances when it is best to back off, myself included, when too much gets said. I've been reading this site for three years, and really don't want to be on the outside looking in, I'm probably not going to post a great deal though. I love looking at the restorations, the collections, and get a vicarious thrill every time one of you rescues a heart stopping treasure from a store or scrap pile. Ok, this doesn't make me an expert by any means, but I've been savoring appliance ads since I got the 1956 Life magazines when I was in junior high, which lead to piles of other publications from the '50s and '60s. And the appliance ads from the 1950s Geographics. I wish I could have rescued the pink Frigidaire bottom freezer that stank of fish unfortunately, but otherwise looked presentable. Or the 1962ish GE with the swivel out shelves at a local thrift store. Or the turquoise washer at the flea market that I hope got a good home. In the meantime, I'll enjoy yours!
 
Super Should be off limits to anyone under 18

What is the logic behind this? I don't understand the need for such a strong statement and would like more information to better understand your position.

Honestly, what is being discussed that a 12 - 17 year old cannot or should not be reading on the Super forum and would require an age restriction? How would someone's true age be validated? If those discussions are taking place, are those topics truly needed on an open and free forum for all the world to read and most to engage in?

Ben
 
swestoyz

I am in FULL agreement with Robert on this. all you need do is read some of the post here. Age can very easily be comfirmed in many ways..
 
Muzzle it already!

Why is it that when one has been directly and publically told by the webmaster to stop positng, one still does so?

Perhaps one needs to be open to the possibility that one does not know when to STFU, and be self-regulating.

Herein lies the only problem here.

Toggleswitch2++1-22-2010-12-45-41.jpg
 
There is a

difference in opinion here which mirrors the fact that we have two very disparate points of view as to what is and is not acceptable language, resp., what is or is not an acceptable topic for discussion in a public forum.

There is no way to bridge the gap, one side or the other will have to give way. I don't care which decision Robert makes, I'll abide by his rules.

There's nothing 'right' or 'wrong' there, it simply is what it is. It's unfortunate that we can't get along on this, but I suppose for the conservatives here this is as non-negotiable as it would be for me to stop being a yellow-dog Democrat and to become a Republican.

We've seen an unending escalation between an established group here and myself since the Austin incident. I can't do a thing about anybody else, but:

I've decided to draw up a list of people whose postings I will simply no longer respond to, even if they are the most innocuous discussions of Imperial or Deluxe topics.

It won't be easy, I don't know whether anyone here has noticed or not, but I do have rather strong opinions on gay rights, civil rights, human rights, separation of church and state and am a strict Constitutionalist.
 
Lee,

Thanks for your response. I didn't see where Robert had mentioned that the Super forum was going to an age restriction, just that he listed it as a possible soultion within this discussion.

I completely disagree that the Super forum needs to be resticted to specific age group if the topics are harmless issues like recipies, detergents, STPP, estate sale finds, or the latest cool vintage refrigerator, killer Sherwood green Imperial range, etc. I would hope that any message I post in the Super forum, or even the Imperial/Deluxe, is viewed as a possible educational post to learn more about this facinating hobby. I know I wouldn't be where I was without the great stories, group photos, Tech Talks, and service literature that has been shared for all types of white goods -- not just washers. The Super forum has been this type of vehicle for many, even if they don't participate in active threads.

If age restrictions are put into place I would be curious to know by what method age would be verified and how the costs are funded for said methods. Yes there are ways to verify age but I would hope they are disclosed. If that were to happen, I'd mostly be curious to find out how old it suggests that I am. :D

Ben
 
i personally couldn't care less

who's list i'm on. i post what i feel someone might enjoy and learn from and when i have questions for others.

if people like it and respond, great! i appreciate it! it's a fun way to share appliance knowledge. if someone avoids replying because they don't like me or what i've said, oh well! life goes on! it doesn't really affect me or anyone else. if that's my worst problem i truly have it made!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Ben, there's no practical way to verify ages on the internet. Even on sites that host hardcore adult material, the best they can do is request credit card information when users register. But even that isn't foolproof (credit cards are often issued to minors, and younger kids usually have ready access to mommy's purse).

It boils down to parents who take responsibility for their kids web browsing, and parents who don't. It's not the job of website owners to be cybernannies for this second group.
 
As I mentioned before....

....be careful what you wish for as what you think you want isn't always what you need.

There is ultimately nothing wrong with the sort of light, and I do mean LIGHT political style discussion that goes on here. Ok, some people get a tad inflamed when others don't quite (or simply refuse) to get their point. So what? People are entitled to hold their own opinions and, as adults, nay citizens of free societies, we have an obligation to be accept those opinions as perfectly valid for the individual that holds them.

The same goes for religion and sex et.al.

Now, when it comes to those under the age of 18, there is absolutely nothing wrong with them being exposed to the sort of conversations that occur on this forum - all of them. I mentioned in an earlier post that language on here is well maintained and certainly I have never seen anything remotely offensive in that regard.

Young people need to be exposed to a variety of topics on a regular basis in order for their own judgement systems to form and than includes topics on sex, politics and religion....

...if you think for a minute that, particularly, the topics that contain any sexual references are 'racy', then you need to go and spend a couple of hours talking to teachers of 10-15yr olds about the sort of language and conversations that they overhear. I guarantee you that it would make straight hair curl.

Automaticwasher.org is one of the most self-moderated sites that I can think of on the net. It is, and this is not a complaint at all, one of the most 'vanilla' sites that I have ever seen - you get more controversy on a mainstream religious site. To try and pour 'bleach' on it and sanitise it further is just not, in my opinion, sensible or a good way forward.

When it all boils down to it, if there is some additional text put underneath the Super Forum entry point that effectively that states what may or may not be seen in the forum, nobody will have justifiable grounds for complaint especially given the topics and general conversation is not exactly heavy-duty.

Remember, young people, teens and children what the news, TV programmes, go to the cinema and walk around their neighbourhoods. They are subjected to far worse than anything I have ever read on here. If this site were to be 'rated' it would almost certainly get a 'G' rating and would never get higher than a 'PG' rating on ANY POSTS....

I would happily let my 12 year old niece, Mikayla, sit and read everything that has been posted on this site that I could read in the knowledge that some of it she would enjoy, some she would question (which is just as it should be) and other things she'd wonder what on earth the poster was talking about and why. Exposure to every topic that has come up on this forum is good for young people to see and read. That way they learn how to THINK for themselves and, hopefully, not have a 'mob' mentality.

Robert,

As a suggestion or even a first step, something along these lines may well quell the flames:

'This forum contains all other non-washer and dishwasher appliance and non-appliance topics of conversation and may vary from recipies, small appliances and furniture to discussions about more indepth social issues concerning every day current affairs, religion, politics and sex that may not be evident in the thread heading. By entering this forum you accept that you may read posts that you do not agree with morally and/or ethically or find offensive. If you do not agree with the topic, general conversation and/or find it offensive, the obligation is on YOU as an individual to click 'Back to Index' located at the top and bottom of each thread and not on the webmaster to monitor and sanitise the conversation to suit you or your individual morals and/or ethics.'

Could be worth a shot and would reduce the amount of code work you have to do too.
 
Yes my dear Toggles we HAVE all noticed

And I for one dont see what the problem with any of it is.. I thought that is way we learn , to see both sides of the issue. and that i s what I like to do.. I too have a few that I will not post with anymore as I think the nastys have take them over. As one would think after all that has happened since the Austin affair one would be more careful but about hurting others.. But some seem to enjoy that sort of thing.Dont they.. I for one am sick of the clawing and hate that some have displayed. I just want things to get back to the basics of laundry related things .
 

Latest posts

Back
Top