newwave1
Well-known member
Rolls,
I always did find it strange they didnt have perfortations in the paddles.
I'm hugely picky about rinsing so to see that the dyson used so much water did nothing but make me smile. You have to note that they're aren't many low water consumption machines that rinse very well. I think manufacturers should've stopped reducing when they got to 65, 60litres. When you get to 45litres your doing nothing but compromise your wash unless it has stupidly good interm spins.
A jetsystem and contrarotating! Man that would've been really good!!
I too am still awaiting to hear if this cheaper redesigned model will surface. Knowing james dyson a man not to be defeated it probably will!
Darren
I always did find it strange they didnt have perfortations in the paddles.
I'm hugely picky about rinsing so to see that the dyson used so much water did nothing but make me smile. You have to note that they're aren't many low water consumption machines that rinse very well. I think manufacturers should've stopped reducing when they got to 65, 60litres. When you get to 45litres your doing nothing but compromise your wash unless it has stupidly good interm spins.
A jetsystem and contrarotating! Man that would've been really good!!
I too am still awaiting to hear if this cheaper redesigned model will surface. Knowing james dyson a man not to be defeated it probably will!
Darren